On Jun 17, 2008, at 7:45 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Log Message:
---
removed trailing white-spaces for lint
In that case, for future reference, you don't need to increase the
port revision, because changing the whitespace in the portfile
doesn't change what files get installed
On Jun 15, 2008, at 5:45 AM, Caspar Florian Ebeling wrote:
Quick question: in macports svn, is doc obsolete and only doc-new in
use anylonger?
I would say yes. As you can see in the repository browser [1] doc
hasn't gotten any commits in 9 months, which is when doc-new was
created.
[1]
Quick question: in macports svn, is doc obsolete and only doc-new in
use anylonger?
I would say yes. As you can see in the repository browser [1] doc hasn't
gotten any commits in 9 months, which is when doc-new was created.
so should we maybe get rid of it?
--
Florian Ebeling
[EMAIL
On Jun 14, 2008, at 1:56 PM, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
On Jun 14, 2008, at 11:45 AM, Rainer Müller wrote:
if {==${configure.compiler}} {
switch -exact ${os.platform} ${os.major} {
darwin 7 { set configure.compiler gcc-3.3 }
darwin 8 { set
Ryan Schmidt wrote:
I don't want to introduce yet more ways for two users to think they
have installed the same thing but in fact they haven't. You're just
creating more support headaches that way.
It is already possible to choose another compiler from the command line:
$ sudo port
Caspar Florian Ebeling wrote:
Quick question: in macports svn, is doc obsolete and only doc-new in
use anylonger?
I would say yes. As you can see in the repository browser [1] doc hasn't
gotten any commits in 9 months, which is when doc-new was created.
so should we maybe get rid of it?
Is there some way to specify a global set of command-line arguments?
You can set EXTRA_ENV in macports.conf, but not command-line args?
I've had to hack portconfigure.tcl in order to get what I want. Is
there a better way?
On Jun 18, 2008, at 4:22 PM, Rainer Müller wrote:
Ryan Schmidt
On Jun 18, 2008, at 5:38 PM, Boyd Waters wrote:
On Jun 18, 2008, at 4:22 PM, Rainer Müller wrote:
Ryan Schmidt wrote:
I don't want to introduce yet more ways for two users to think they
have installed the same thing but in fact they haven't. You're just
creating more support headaches that
On Jun 18, 2008, at 10:17 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+
+
+
+#
+##EOF
Why do you add this to the end of your ports? You have this in
ethereal, wireshark, afflib, aimage, libewf, metasploit2, metasploit3
and now scrub. I don't see what benefit it has.
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 11:30:08PM -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Jun 18, 2008, at 10:17 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+
+
+
+#
+##EOF
Why do you add this to the end of your ports? You have this in
ethereal, wireshark, afflib, aimage, libewf, metasploit2, metasploit3
and now
Eric Hall wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 11:30:08PM -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Jun 18, 2008, at 10:17 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+
+
+
+#
+##EOF
Why do you add this to the end of your ports? You have this in
ethereal, wireshark, afflib, aimage, libewf, metasploit2, metasploit3
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 09:42:27PM -0700, Blair Zajac wrote:
Eric Hall wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 11:30:08PM -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Jun 18, 2008, at 10:17 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+
+
+
+#
+##EOF
Why do you add this to the end of your ports? You have this in
12 matches
Mail list logo
