Re: Trac issue tracker is slow

2008-06-21 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Jun 20, 2008, at 11:21 PM, William Siegrist wrote: On Jun 11, 2008, at 3:31 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: The Trac issue tracker is very slow, and it has been for weeks, maybe months. View a ticket: 10 seconds Preview a change to a ticket: 10 seconds Make a change to a ticket: 14 seconds

Re: Trac issue tracker is slow

2008-06-21 Thread William Siegrist
On Jun 20, 2008, at 11:45 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: On Jun 20, 2008, at 11:21 PM, William Siegrist wrote: On Jun 11, 2008, at 3:31 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: The Trac issue tracker is very slow, and it has been for weeks, maybe months. View a ticket: 10 seconds Preview a change to a ticket:

Re: [37615] branches/gsoc08-privileges/base

2008-06-21 Thread Paul Magrath
On 21 Jun 2008, at 00:38, Ryan Schmidt wrote: On Jun 15, 2008, at 12:36 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- branches/gsoc08-privileges/base/configure 2008-06-15 17:35:46 UTC (rev 37614) +++ branches/gsoc08-privileges/base/configure 2008-06-15 17:36:41 UTC (rev 37615) @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ #!

rsync complaining about perl/p5-internals/work

2008-06-21 Thread Blair Zajac
Looks like there's a file on the master: $ port -v sync Synchronizing local ports tree from rsync://rsync.macports.org/release/ports/ receiving file list ... done skipping non-regular file perl/p5-internals/work This file is not in my

Re: [37615] branches/gsoc08-privileges/base

2008-06-21 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Jun 21, 2008, at 9:35 AM, Paul Magrath wrote: On 21 Jun 2008, at 00:38, Ryan Schmidt wrote: On Jun 15, 2008, at 12:36 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- branches/gsoc08-privileges/base/configure 2008-06-15 17:35:46 UTC (rev 37614) +++ branches/gsoc08-privileges/base/configure

Re: rsync complaining about perl/p5-internals/work

2008-06-21 Thread William Siegrist
Hmm. Its a symlink to a directory which doesnt exist on the server. Maybe dluke inadvertently committed it. http://svn.macports.org/repository/macports/trunk/dports/perl/p5-internals/work http://trac.macports.org/changeset/37680 In any case, you can ignore this error. -Bill On Jun 21,

Re: [37742] branches/gsoc08-privileges/base/configure

2008-06-21 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Jun 21, 2008, at 9:27 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Revision: 37742 http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/changeset/37742 Author: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2008-06-21 07:27:40 -0700 (Sat, 21 Jun 2008) Log Message: --- Regenerated with autoconf 2.61 as

Re: rsync complaining about perl/p5-internals/work

2008-06-21 Thread Ryan Schmidt
I removed that symlink r37744. On Jun 21, 2008, at 12:50 PM, William Siegrist wrote: Hmm. Its a symlink to a directory which doesnt exist on the server. Maybe dluke inadvertently committed it. http://svn.macports.org/repository/macports/trunk/dports/perl/p5- internals/work

Re: [37615] branches/gsoc08-privileges/base

2008-06-21 Thread Paul Magrath
Nope. I do have two versions installed but they are both v2.61: /Developer/usr/bin/autoconf /usr/bin/autoconf Weird, huh? Paul. On 21 Jun 2008, at 18:40, Ryan Schmidt wrote: Does locate bin/autoconf give any clues? Perhaps you have more than one installed. I, for example, have different

Batteries Included Policy

2008-06-21 Thread Landon Fuller
I would like to propose a policy for general consideration. I believe it could save everyone energy and brain-cycles; let's call it batteries included: As a general rule, ports should enable all standard features/ functionality that may be useful to an end-user. With this: - You never

Re: Batteries Included Policy

2008-06-21 Thread Rainer Müller
Landon Fuller wrote: I would like to propose a policy for general consideration. I believe it could save everyone energy and brain-cycles; let's call it batteries included: As a general rule, ports should enable all standard features/ functionality that may be useful to an