Re: macports website

2009-07-14 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Jul 13, 2009, at 17:31, Jeremy Lavergne wrote: We've had a ticket (#20278) come in about the web site once again. Previously, to our chagrin the XHTML broke in IE7 (#14062). I'd like to point out that using XHTML was a somewhat divergent path from HTML. With the advent of HTML 5, we

Re: macports website

2009-07-14 Thread Jeremy Lavergne
I'd suggest using the HTML 5 doctype so it's ready to go in the future, but essentially using HTML 4.01 transitional. On Jul 14, 2009, at 2:39 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: I have not kept up with the developments of HTML 5 except for the canvas tag. Is there a specific feature of HTML 5 you

Re: macports website

2009-07-14 Thread Joshua Root
On 2009-7-14 08:31, Jeremy Lavergne wrote: I'd like to point out that using XHTML was a somewhat divergent path from HTML. With the advent of HTML 5, we find ourselves once again returning to the HTML side of things. On the other hand: XHTML5. Interested in this transition, I asked wms how

Re: macports website

2009-07-14 Thread Jeremy Lavergne
On Jul 14, 2009, at 6:40 AM, Joshua Root wrote: On 2009-7-14 08:31, Jeremy Lavergne wrote: I'd like to point out that using XHTML was a somewhat divergent path from HTML. With the advent of HTML 5, we find ourselves once again returning to the HTML side of things. On the other hand: XHTML5.

Re: macports website

2009-07-14 Thread Joshua Root
On 2009-7-14 20:50, Jeremy Lavergne wrote: And also getting the site off of XHTML ;-) A move for which you still haven't mentioned any specific advantages. - Josh ___ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org

Re: macports website

2009-07-14 Thread Jeremy Lavergne
Future work? I wonder, what were the advantages of going with XHTML to begin with? On Jul 14, 2009, at 6:57 AM, Joshua Root wrote: A move for which you still haven't mentioned any specific advantages. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: ocaml port updates

2009-07-14 Thread Anil Madhavapeddy
On 9 Mar 2009, at 20:45, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote: On 9 Mar 2009, at 20:38, Daniel J. Luke wrote: On Mar 9, 2009, at 4:22 PM, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote: Most of the ports involved are openmaintainers and the updates are a bit interlinked due to ocaml being updated to 3.11.0. In a case like

Re: macports website

2009-07-14 Thread William Siegrist
On Jul 14, 2009, at 3:57 AM, Joshua Root wrote: On 2009-7-14 20:50, Jeremy Lavergne wrote: And also getting the site off of XHTML ;-) A move for which you still haven't mentioned any specific advantages. The W3C has abandoned XHTML2, so we should not do any new work in XHTML. I

Re: macports website

2009-07-14 Thread Kristofer Henriksson
I believe that while the W3C will be disbanding the XHTML working group, this does not extend to the specification itself, which will exist in the HTML 5 specification (see http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/the-xhtml-syntax.html#the-xhtml-syntax). In other words, XHTML will continue to be have the same

mimms 3.2.1 update

2009-07-14 Thread Cédric Luthi
Hello, We have a maintainer timeout on https://trac.macports.org/ticket/20204 Could someone please commit ? Best regards. Cédric Luthi ___ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org

installing Rpy using MacPorts

2009-07-14 Thread Mark Moll
I am trying to create a port for rpy2, an interface to R from python. I have R and python2.6 installed through MacPorts. When I run python setup.py build in the rpy2-2.0.6 directory, I get the following error: --- Computing dependencies for py26-rpy --- Building py26-rpy Error: Target

Re: ocaml port updates

2009-07-14 Thread Andre Stechert
I'm taking a look now. On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 9:58 PM, Anil Madhavapeddya...@recoil.org wrote: On 9 Mar 2009, at 20:45, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote: On 9 Mar 2009, at 20:38, Daniel J. Luke wrote: On Mar 9, 2009, at 4:22 PM, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote: Most of the ports involved are

memtester port

2009-07-14 Thread Scott Haneda
I am not seeing a port for memtester. $cd ~/Downloads/memtester-4.0.8 $sudo make $file memtester memtester: Mach-O executable i386 $./memtester 100 3 -L memtester version 4.0.8 (32-bit) Copyright (C) 2007 Charles Cazabon. Licensed under the GNU General Public

Re: installing Rpy using MacPorts

2009-07-14 Thread Bryan Blackburn
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 11:52:23AM -0500, Mark Moll said: I am trying to create a port for rpy2, an interface to R from python. I have R and python2.6 installed through MacPorts. When I run python setup.py build in the rpy2-2.0.6 directory, I get the following error: --- Computing

Re: memtester port

2009-07-14 Thread Jeremy Lavergne
On Jul 14, 2009, at 3:01 PM, Scott Haneda wrote: I am not seeing a port for memtester. # $Id$ PortSystem 1.0 namememtester version 4.0.8 categories sysutils maintainers hostwizard.com:scott description A userspace utility for testing

Re: memtester port

2009-07-14 Thread Scott Haneda
Where am I getting tripped up on this one? You need to add `use_configure no` Ok, done http://dl.getdropbox.com/u/340087/Drops/07.14.09/memtest-4460164b-123912.txt Looks like this was called from the makefile: mkdir -m 755 -p /usr/local/{bin,man/man8} install -m 755 memtester /usr/local/bin/

Re: memtester port

2009-07-14 Thread Jeremy Lavergne
Ooo! you use dropbox! /drool On Jul 14, 2009, at 3:43 PM, Scott Haneda wrote: http://dl.getdropbox.com/u/340087/Drops/07.14.09/memtest-4460164b-123912.txt smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ macports-dev mailing list

Re: memtester port

2009-07-14 Thread Jeremy Lavergne
On Jul 14, 2009, at 3:43 PM, Scott Haneda wrote: My plan was to infact xinstal the files, but I am open to learning how to patch the makefile. In this one, do I need to just reinplace INSTALLPATH = /usr/local Here is the makefile

Re: macports website

2009-07-14 Thread Jeremy Lavergne
I don't seeing using HTML 5 as an upgrade so much as a side step. It doesn't break things -- even as far back as IE6, which most companies use. Also, since yet another ticket has shown up due to having to do fun fancy tagging due to the XML side of XHTML, I figured it would be another

Re: memtester port

2009-07-14 Thread Scott Haneda
On Jul 14, 2009, at 12:44 PM, Jeremy Lavergne wrote: Ooo! you use dropbox! /drool On Jul 14, 2009, at 3:43 PM, Scott Haneda wrote: http://dl.getdropbox.com/u/340087/Drops/07.14.09/memtest-4460164b-123912.txt ha ha :) If you want to try out a small little app I made, allows you to drop

Re: memtester port

2009-07-14 Thread Scott Haneda
On Jul 14, 2009, at 12:46 PM, Jeremy Lavergne wrote: On Jul 14, 2009, at 3:43 PM, Scott Haneda wrote: My plan was to infact xinstal the files, but I am open to learning how to patch the makefile. In this one, do I need to just reinplace INSTALLPATH = /usr/local Here is the makefile

Re: memtester port

2009-07-14 Thread Jeremy Lavergne
You just tell it what phase you want it to do, and then it'll stop after it. `sudo port patch memtester` fetch - extract - patch - configure - build - test? - destroot - install - activate It's on the Guide if you need a precise listing. On Jul 14, 2009, at 3:58 PM, Scott Haneda wrote:

Re: memtester port

2009-07-14 Thread Jeremy Lavergne
There's also -k (keep mode) which should counteract the default to autoclean. On Jul 14, 2009, at 3:58 PM, Scott Haneda wrote: Ok, working on it. How do you test this as you go, and tell ports to not clean up the files, so I can see if the reinplaces worked to my liking? smime.p7s

Re: memtester port

2009-07-14 Thread Scott Haneda
On Jul 14, 2009, at 12:46 PM, Jeremy Lavergne wrote: On Jul 14, 2009, at 3:43 PM, Scott Haneda wrote: My plan was to infact xinstal the files, but I am open to learning how to patch the makefile. In this one, do I need to just reinplace INSTALLPATH = /usr/local Here is the makefile

Re: memtester port

2009-07-14 Thread Jeremy Lavergne
On Jul 14, 2009, at 4:14 PM, Scott Haneda wrote: Is this an issue wrt to the mkdir? Should I change that as well? You wouldn't make it past your pre-patch if that were the case. It would error out saying it couldn't find the file. install: all mkdir -m 755 -p

Re: memtester port

2009-07-14 Thread Scott Haneda
On Jul 14, 2009, at 1:21 PM, Jeremy Lavergne wrote: long_description is needed, but you can set it to ${description} I need to head out for a few hours ... someone else care to continue helping? :-) I think I got it, cool thing is, now people do not have to pay the whopping $1.39 to buy

Re: memtester port

2009-07-14 Thread Scott Haneda
Any other suggestions before I ship it off to trac? Does it pass `port lint --nitpick memtester`? Thanks for the regex explanation, I was so hung up on that quoting issue and escapes. Handy command on the nitpick $port lint --nitpick memtester --- Verifying Portfile for memtester ---

Re: memtester port

2009-07-14 Thread Scott Haneda
On Jul 14, 2009, at 7:36 PM, Jeremy Lavergne wrote: Alrighty, create a port submission ticket and you're good to go. On Jul 14, 2009, at 10:01 PM, Scott Haneda wrote: I had a few newline issues, but I am all set now. http://trac.macports.org/ticket/20306 -- Scott * If you contact me off