Re: [77456] trunk/dports/devel/otx/Portfile

2011-03-31 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Mar 31, 2011, at 02:32, and.dam...@macports.org wrote: Revision: 77456 http://trac.macports.org/changeset/77456 Author: and.dam...@macports.org Date: 2011-03-31 00:32:14 -0700 (Thu, 31 Mar 2011) Log Message: --- port otx, bumped to svn revision 556, removed

first xcode 4 problem

2011-03-31 Thread Jeremy Lavergne
It seems we've come across our first bug because of xcode 4: valgrind cannot work on 64-bit processes when built from xcode 4 versus 3. Has anyone else used xcode 4 and come across issues with 64-bit (seems to be the linker)? Begin forwarded message: From: Julian Seward jsew...@acm.org

Re: How can I remove '-arch x86_64' during configure

2011-03-31 Thread Konis Kjell
Thanks for your reply and sorry it's taken me so long to get back to this. I finally got around to installing MacPorts from trunk and trying configure.compiler macports-llvm-gcc-4.2 It uses -m64 which gets me past the first problem. But later on, configure is not able to 'determine how to

Re: first xcode 4 problem

2011-03-31 Thread Dan Ports
We had a linker problem with emacs and Xcode 4 (#28167). But that was a case of the Xcode 4 linker throwing in a new, unexpected section header, so it looks unrelated to this. Dan -- Dan R. K. Ports MIT CSAILhttp://drkp.net/

followup on iOS cross-compiler support

2011-03-31 Thread James Gregurich
Its been some time since I submitted my experimental work for iOS support in mac ports. I haven't gotten any feedback yet. Is this work still in the queue to be looked at? What's the status? -James ___ macports-dev mailing list

no no_ / was Re: [MacPorts] #28985: glib2 does not need dbus

2011-03-31 Thread Titus von Boxberg
Am 31.03.2011 um 17:10 schrieb MacPorts: We'd also rather not use variants named like +no_foo, instead, have a default +foo variant that can be turned off. Really? I copied the no_xx scheme from another port (here: graphviz, but I think there are quite a few ports with no_x11.) If that is

Re: no no_ / was Re: [MacPorts] #28985: glib2 does not need dbus

2011-03-31 Thread Joshua Root
On 2011-4-1 07:37 , Titus von Boxberg wrote: Am 31.03.2011 um 17:10 schrieb MacPorts: We'd also rather not use variants named like +no_foo, instead, have a default +foo variant that can be turned off. Really? I copied the no_xx scheme from another port (here: graphviz, but I think there

port contents inactive

2011-03-31 Thread Bradley Giesbrecht
How challenging would it be to have port contents work on installed rather then active? Example: $ port installed help2man The following ports are currently installed: help2man @1.38.4_0 help2man @1.39.2_0 (active) pillbox:pixilla brad$ $ port contents help2man@1.38.4_0 I'm trying to

Re: port contents inactive

2011-03-31 Thread Joshua Root
On 2011-4-1 09:12 , Bradley Giesbrecht wrote: How challenging would it be to have port contents work on installed rather then active? Not terribly. This is http://trac.macports.org/ticket/18916 BTW. - Josh ___ macports-dev mailing list

[GSoC][Binary dependency check] Proposal review

2011-03-31 Thread Felipe Tanus
Hi, I finished to write my GSoC proposal. It might be found here: http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/proposal/review/google/gsoc2011/fotanus/1001# Any comments will be appreciated. []'s -- Felipe de Oliveira Tanus E-mail: fota...@gmail.com Blog: http://www.itlife.com.br Site: