On Mar 31, 2011, at 02:32, and.dam...@macports.org wrote:
Revision: 77456
http://trac.macports.org/changeset/77456
Author: and.dam...@macports.org
Date: 2011-03-31 00:32:14 -0700 (Thu, 31 Mar 2011)
Log Message:
---
port otx, bumped to svn revision 556, removed
It seems we've come across our first bug because of xcode 4: valgrind cannot
work on 64-bit processes when built from xcode 4 versus 3.
Has anyone else used xcode 4 and come across issues with 64-bit (seems to be
the linker)?
Begin forwarded message:
From: Julian Seward jsew...@acm.org
Thanks for your reply and sorry it's taken me so long to get back to this.
I finally got around to installing MacPorts from trunk and trying
configure.compiler macports-llvm-gcc-4.2
It uses -m64 which gets me past the first problem. But later on, configure
is not able to 'determine how to
We had a linker problem with emacs and Xcode 4 (#28167). But that was a
case of the Xcode 4 linker throwing in a new, unexpected section
header, so it looks unrelated to this.
Dan
--
Dan R. K. Ports MIT CSAILhttp://drkp.net/
Its been some time since I submitted my experimental work for iOS support in
mac ports. I haven't gotten any feedback yet. Is this work still in the queue
to be looked at? What's the status?
-James
___
macports-dev mailing list
Am 31.03.2011 um 17:10 schrieb MacPorts:
We'd also rather not use variants named
like +no_foo, instead, have a default +foo variant that can be turned off.
Really?
I copied the no_xx scheme from another port (here: graphviz, but I think there
are quite a few ports with no_x11.)
If that is
On 2011-4-1 07:37 , Titus von Boxberg wrote:
Am 31.03.2011 um 17:10 schrieb MacPorts:
We'd also rather not use variants named
like +no_foo, instead, have a default +foo variant that can be turned off.
Really?
I copied the no_xx scheme from another port (here: graphviz, but I think there
How challenging would it be to have port contents work on installed rather
then active?
Example:
$ port installed help2man
The following ports are currently installed:
help2man @1.38.4_0
help2man @1.39.2_0 (active)
pillbox:pixilla brad$
$ port contents help2man@1.38.4_0
I'm trying to
On 2011-4-1 09:12 , Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
How challenging would it be to have port contents work on installed
rather then active?
Not terribly. This is http://trac.macports.org/ticket/18916 BTW.
- Josh
___
macports-dev mailing list
Hi,
I finished to write my GSoC proposal. It might be found here:
http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/proposal/review/google/gsoc2011/fotanus/1001#
Any comments will be appreciated.
[]'s
--
Felipe de Oliveira Tanus
E-mail: fota...@gmail.com
Blog: http://www.itlife.com.br
Site:
10 matches
Mail list logo