On 2011-8-1 16:49 , Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> On Aug 1, 2011, at 01:45, Joshua Root wrote:
>
>> On 2011-8-1 16:40 , Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>>> When would ${name} and ${subport} ever be equal?
>>
>> In this particular case, when the user runs 'port py-bitstring'.
>
> But py-bitstring isn't a valid po
On Aug 1, 2011, at 01:45, Joshua Root wrote:
> On 2011-8-1 16:40 , Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>> When would ${name} and ${subport} ever be equal?
>
> In this particular case, when the user runs 'port py-bitstring'.
But py-bitstring isn't a valid port, is it? I thought this port only provided
py26-bi
On 2011-8-1 16:40 , Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> When would ${name} and ${subport} ever be equal?
In this particular case, when the user runs 'port py-bitstring'.
- Josh
___
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.o
On Jul 31, 2011, at 18:59, b...@macports.org wrote:
> Revision: 81499
> http://trac.macports.org/changeset/81499
> Author: b...@macports.org
> Date: 2011-07-31 16:59:23 -0700 (Sun, 31 Jul 2011)
> Log Message:
> ---
> python bitstring modules: unify
> +if {${name} != ${subp
On 2011-7-30 15:01 , Joshua Root wrote:
> I think we'll want to release 2.0.1 pretty soon with the subport index
> fix. We should also revise the uid selection for added users (ticket
> #30464).
>
> Anything else?
So, this is pretty much ready to go from my POV. I'll package it up
sometime in the
On Jul 31, 2011, at 08:28, Joshua Root wrote:
> On 2011-7-31 18:21 , Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>>
>> I'd like to get the ball rolling on this ticket, the goal of which is to
>> print a warning if a reinplace call doesn't end up changing anything in the
>> file.
>>
>> https://trac.macports.org/ticket
On Jul 31, 2011, at 10:48, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
> On Jul 30, 2011, at 11:56 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jul 31, 2011, at 01:36, dpo...@macports.org wrote:
>>
>>> Revision: 81459
>>>http://trac.macports.org/changeset/81459
>>> Author: dpo...@macports.org
>>> Date: 2011
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 08:24:05PM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote:
>Can I get Ticket 30331...
>
> https://trac.macports.org/attachment/ticket/30331/Portfile.diff
>
> committed to switch pymol from Numeric to py26-numpy/py26-scipy?
> Upstream has commited my patches so bumping the svn pull to r3962
On 2011-07-29 02:50 , Joshua Root wrote:
> Now that the customary week has passed since the release of 2.0.0, I
> thought I'd point out some of the goodies that are now available to
> portfile authors.
Another subtle change, "system" now accepts -W to specify a working
directory for the command.
On 2011-07-31 10:02 , Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> Now System Preferences' Accounts pane opens fine. Yes, the MacPorts user is
> displayed there, next to "Message\ Bus" (which has been there for years) and
> my regular user. Ideally we wouldn't display the macports user in System
> Preferences, but it
> After "port selfupdate" I still don't see any output when running
>
> port list 'replaced_by:.*'
>
> Where am I missing something?
You need to run trunk: you won't get the change via selfupdate until the next
release is made.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
After "port selfupdate" I still don't see any output when running
port list 'replaced_by:.*'
Where am I missing something?
___
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports
On Jul 30, 2011, at 11:56 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> On Jul 31, 2011, at 01:36, dpo...@macports.org wrote:
>
>> Revision: 81459
>> http://trac.macports.org/changeset/81459
>> Author: dpo...@macports.org
>> Date: 2011-07-30 23:36:16 -0700 (Sat, 30 Jul 2011)
>> Log Message:
>> -
Jeremy Lavergne wrote:
> Do commit that!
Committed! (r81475)
--anders
___
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
> Nothing much, just that "replaced_by" is missing from selectors…
Cool catch!
Thanks!!!
___
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
Do commit that!
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
Marko Käning wrote:
> I know that I can find ports with launchpad homepage like this:
>
> $ port list 'homepage:.*https://launchpad.*'
>
> but when I do this to find ports being actually replaced by some other port:
>
> $ port list 'replaced_by:.*'
>
> it does not work. :-(
>
> Wh
I know that I can find ports with launchpad homepage like this:
$ port list 'homepage:.*https://launchpad.*'
but when I do this to find ports being actually replaced by some other port:
$ port list 'replaced_by:.*'
it does not work. :-(
What I am doing wrong here?
_
On 2011-7-31 18:21 , Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> I'd like to get the ball rolling on this ticket, the goal of which is to
> print a warning if a reinplace call doesn't end up changing anything in the
> file.
>
> https://trac.macports.org/ticket/15514
>
> I wrote the patch three years ago and have
> I'd like to commit just the first half of the patch, which introduces the -q
> flag to reinplace, and release that with 2.0.1 (without the flag (or absence
> of it) actually doing anything). Then in a later release, we'll add the
> actual warning message when the flag is not used. The reason i
On Jul 31, 2011, at 02:03, dpo...@macports.org wrote:
> Revision: 81461
> http://trac.macports.org/changeset/81461
> Author: dpo...@macports.org
> Date: 2011-07-31 00:03:52 -0700 (Sun, 31 Jul 2011)
> Log Message:
> ---
> encfs, ext2fuse: allow fuse4x to satisfy macfuse depen
On Jul 30, 2011, at 00:01, Joshua Root wrote:
> I think we'll want to release 2.0.1 pretty soon with the subport index
> fix. We should also revise the uid selection for added users (ticket
> #30464).
>
> Anything else?
I'd like to get the ball rolling on this ticket, the goal of which is to p
On Jul 31, 2011, at 00:04, Joshua Root wrote:
> On 2011-7-31 13:59 , Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>>
>> On Jul 30, 2011, at 20:23, Joshua Root wrote:
>>
>>> Looking at the source, it will use the local node if you don't specify
>>> any -n value. Does it work that way?
>>
>> Yes! That works on Tiger:
>
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 01:56:56AM -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> ...until those ports start jumping on the fuse4x bandwagon and start looking
> for it by that name, right? :)
The well-behaved ones are already getting the library name from
pkgconfig (fuse.pc) and don't care, there are just a couple
24 matches
Mail list logo
