Re: Update fails at iso-codes

2012-05-16 Thread Jasper Frumau
Yeah, just done that: https://trac.macports.org/ticket/34482 On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Jeremy Lavergne < jer...@lavergne.gotdns.org> wrote: > > I am really stuck here with iso-codes @3.34_0 as indicated earlier. Now > I cannot upgrade my ports as I get stuck and I cannot install a lot

Re: Update fails at iso-codes

2012-05-16 Thread Jeremy Lavergne
> I am really stuck here with iso-codes @3.34_0 as indicated earlier. Now I > cannot upgrade my ports as I get stuck and I cannot install a lot of new > ports like Inkscape either. Is there a way to patch this quickly or some > other way so I can get beyond this issue? All I can suggest is tur

Re: Update fails at iso-codes

2012-05-16 Thread Jasper Frumau
I am really stuck here with iso-codes @3.34_0 as indicated earlier. Now I cannot upgrade my ports as I get stuck and I cannot install a lot of new ports like Inkscape either. Is there a way to patch this quickly or some other way so I can get beyond this issue? On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 12:21 PM, J

Re: add_users won't?!

2012-05-16 Thread Craig Treleaven
At 8:09 AM -0400 5/16/12, Craig Treleaven wrote: At 7:41 AM -0400 5/16/12, Jeremy Lavergne wrote: > I'm trying to add a user (with a new group) and I can't get it to work. Below are the relevant bits from the portfile. set mythtvuser ${name}user set mythtvgroupmyth

Re: MacPorts 2.1.0 has been released - problems with the progress lines

2012-05-16 Thread James Berry
On May 16, 2012, at 3:51 PM, Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote: > Clemens Lang wrote: >> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 11:17:02PM +0100, Chris Jones wrote: > Is there something I can do to switch this progess thingy off ??? >> >>> disabling the feature isn't really the same thing as just disabling >>> the

Re: MacPorts 2.1.0 has been released - problems with the progress lines

2012-05-16 Thread Bjarne D Mathiesen
Clemens Lang wrote: > On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 11:17:02PM +0100, Chris Jones wrote: Is there something I can do to switch this progess thingy off ??? > >> disabling the feature isn't really the same thing as just disabling >> the eye-candy progress count-down. I suspect you are not the only on

Re: [MacPorts] #34472: splash @2.1.0 new release

2012-05-16 Thread Daniel Price
thanks very much! Daniel On 17 May 2012, at 08:32, MacPorts wrote: > #34472: splash @2.1.0 new release > --+- > Reporter: daniel.price@… | Owner: ryandesign@… > Type: update

Re: MacPorts 2.1.0: Weird rebuild order of "broken ports" !

2012-05-16 Thread Marko Käning
Hi Clemens, On May 16, 2012, at 11:33 PM, Clemens Lang wrote: > Feel free to Cc me on any of these tickets if you need clarification as > to why rev-upgrade thinks a binary is broken. I'll be offline for this week, but I'll definitely come back to you regarding this topic. Could you please poin

Re: MacPorts 2.1.0: Weird rebuild order of "broken ports" !

2012-05-16 Thread Clemens Lang
Hi, On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 09:40:48PM +0200, Marko Käning wrote: > But my feeling was right, since - after having issued a rev-upgrade a > while ago - I see now that something circular is happening. As you > can see kdelibs4 and phonon are by now uninstalled and (are getting) > installed again T

Re: MacPorts 2.1.0: Weird rebuild order of "broken ports" !

2012-05-16 Thread Marko Käning
Hi Clemens, already last night I had the feeling that something with the rebuilding doesn't work out as necessary, although your fix changed the order of ports to rebuild in a more sensible manner… But my feeling was right, since - after having issued a rev-upgrade a while ago - I see now that

Re: [enhancement] proposal - make all ports independent of which version of Perl is installed or the major one

2012-05-16 Thread Bjarne D Mathiesen
Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote: > I'll have some stat shortly as to how many & which ports we are talking > about. after some problems with variable scoping and piping, process substitution came to the rescue, and I got this piece of bash 4.2 : for version in 12 8 10 14 do cat << EOT +

Re: add_users won't?!

2012-05-16 Thread Craig Treleaven
At 7:41 AM -0400 5/16/12, Jeremy Lavergne wrote: > I'm trying to add a user (with a new group) and I can't get it to work. Below are the relevant bits from the portfile. set mythtvuser ${name}user set mythtvgroupmyth set mythtvhomedir ${prefix}/var/${mythtvuser

Re: add_users won't?!

2012-05-16 Thread Jeremy Lavergne
> I'm trying to add a user (with a new group) and I can't get it to work. > Below are the relevant bits from the portfile. > > set mythtvuser${name}user > set mythtvgroup myth > set mythtvhomedir ${prefix}/var/${mythtvuser} > add_users ${mythtvuser} group=${myth

add_users won't?!

2012-05-16 Thread Craig Treleaven
Hi: I'm trying to add a user (with a new group) and I can't get it to work. Below are the relevant bits from the portfile. set mythtvuser ${name}user set mythtvgroup myth set mythtvhomedir ${prefix}/var/${mythtvuser} add_users ${mythtvuser} group=${mythtvgroup} home=${m

Re: [enhancement] proposal - make all ports independent of which version of Perl is installed or the major one

2012-05-16 Thread Bjarne D Mathiesen
Joshua Root wrote: > On 2012-5-16 11:01 , Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote: >> I'ld like to return to my orignal problem : >> making ports independent of which version of Perl is installed >> -or- >> the major one >> >> So - my question still stands : are you interested in me doing the basic

Re: [enhancement] proposal - make all ports independent of which version of Perl is installed or the major one

2012-05-16 Thread Joshua Root
On 2012-5-16 11:46 , Lawrence Velázquez wrote: > On May 15, 2012, at 9:01 p.m., Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote: > >> So - my question still stands : are you interested in me doing the basic >> hard work in making ports that are hardcoded to a specific Perl5 version >> independent of which version is ins

Re: [enhancement] proposal - make all ports independent of which version of Perl is installed or the major one

2012-05-16 Thread Joshua Root
On 2012-5-16 11:01 , Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote: > I'ld like to return to my orignal problem : > making ports independent of which version of Perl is installed > -or- > the major one > > Previously, the discussion rapidly deteriorated into quite other > problems having not that muc