Re: Using python before it is selected?

> So the port I'm working on uses Python and requires a bunch of modules as > dependencies. That's working OK but then my port's configure _uses_ python > to test if the dependencies are installed. If this is the first time > installing python on a machine, no version of python is 'selected'.

Using python before it is selected?

Hi: So the port I'm working on uses Python and requires a bunch of modules as dependencies. That's working OK but then my port's configure _uses_ python to test if the dependencies are installed. If this is the first time installing python on a machine, no version of python is 'selected'. a

Anything else for 2.1.1?

I think this about covers it: ___ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev

Re: [93235] trunk/dports/mail/postfix/Portfile

On May 18, 2012, at 1:59 AM, Joshua Root wrote: >> Revision: 93235 >> https://trac.macports.org/changeset/93235 >> Author: pixilla at macports.org >> Date: 2012-05-17 22:15:22 -0700 (Thu, 17 May 2012) >> Log Message: >> --- >> mail/postfix: >> - Add variants for mysql51, my

Re: [93257] trunk/dports/aqua/qtoctave-mac

On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > #33901 says the problem occurs at runtime. That means for users to benefit > from this fix you need to increase the revision to encourage a rebuild. Correct, committed r93263. Speaking about the issue there are variables 'this' and 'thisVa

Re: [93257] trunk/dports/aqua/qtoctave-mac

On May 18, 2012, at 08:16, and.dam...@macports.org wrote: > Revision: 93257 > https://trac.macports.org/changeset/93257 > Author: and.dam...@macports.org > Date: 2012-05-18 06:16:41 -0700 (Fri, 18 May 2012) > Log Message: > --- > port qtoctave-mac: fix issue #33901, mask le

Re: [enhancement] proposal - make all ports independent of which version of Perl is installed or the major one

Lawrence Velázquez wrote: > On May 18, 2012, at 8:13 a.m., Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote: > >> I really do think we need to find some kind of solution to this problem >> with having Perl 5.12 hardcoded into 96 (the 92 my scipt finds in my >> setup + the 4 I've personally converted) ports. Presently, it

Re: [enhancement] proposal - make all ports independent of which version of Perl is installed or the major one

On May 18, 2012, at 8:13 a.m., Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote: > I really do think we need to find some kind of solution to this problem > with having Perl 5.12 hardcoded into 96 (the 92 my scipt finds in my > setup + the 4 I've personally converted) ports. Presently, it hinders > people in using any ot

Re: [enhancement] proposal - make all ports independent of which version of Perl is installed or the major one

OK - that clarifies what will go wrong in a way so that even I can understand it ;-) Lawrence Velázquez wrote: > On May 17, 2012, at 7:25 p.m., Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote: > >>> Your idea won't work right. If the path to an arbitrary perl is >>> inserted into any of the files installed by the port,

Re: xymon-server port wrongly upgrade to older version from 4.3.7 to 4.3.0

Yes, that was it indeed. I removed the old Portfile(s) of my local port repository and could upgrade again to 4.3.7. Thanks a lot for your lightning-speed support Ryan. Le 18/05/12 11:20, Ryan Schmidt a écrit : On May 18, 2012, at 04:17, Francois Claire wrote: I've upgraded macports to v

Re: Severe issue with gfortran (from gcc) with binary builds

> The Lion buildbot was initially set up with Xcode 4.1 so the Lion packages > were initially built with that. The buildbot has since then been updated to > Xcode 4.3.2 but no new version/revision of gmp has been committed since then > so the package has not been rebuilt on that. > > The gmp por

Re: [93246] trunk/dports/devel/glib2/files/patch-configure.diff

On 2012-5-18 19:12 , Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > On May 18, 2012, at 04:02, and.dam...@macports.org wrote: > >> Revision: 93246 >> https://trac.macports.org/changeset/93246 >> Author: and.dam...@macports.org >> Date: 2012-05-18 02:02:27 -0700 (Fri, 18 May 2012) >> Log Message: >> -

Re: xymon-server port wrongly upgrade to older version from 4.3.7 to 4.3.0

On May 18, 2012, at 04:17, Francois Claire wrote: > I've upgraded macports to v2.1.0 and run a "sudo port upgrade outdated". This > wrongly upgraded my xymon-server to an older version jumping from 4.3.7 back > to 4.3.0: > Any idea why this happened ? Do you have a local port repository conta

xymon-server port wrongly upgrade to older version from 4.3.7 to 4.3.0

Hi, I've upgraded macports to v2.1.0 and run a "sudo port upgrade outdated". This wrongly upgraded my xymon-server to an older version jumping from 4.3.7 back to 4.3.0: ---> Computing dependencies for xymon-server ---> Fetching archive for xymon-server ---> Attempting to fetch xymon-serv

Re: [93246] trunk/dports/devel/glib2/files/patch-configure.diff

On May 18, 2012, at 04:02, and.dam...@macports.org wrote: > Revision: 93246 > https://trac.macports.org/changeset/93246 > Author: and.dam...@macports.org > Date: 2012-05-18 02:02:27 -0700 (Fri, 18 May 2012) > Log Message: > --- > port glib2: BSD readlink doesn't accept -f f

Re: [93235] trunk/dports/mail/postfix/Portfile

On 2012-5-18 19:01 , Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > On May 18, 2012, at 03:59, Joshua Root wrote: > >>> Revision: 93235 >>> https://trac.macports.org/changeset/93235 >>> Author: pixilla at macports.org >>> Date: 2012-05-17 22:15:22 -0700 (Thu, 17 May 2012) >>> Log Message: >>> ---

Re: [93235] trunk/dports/mail/postfix/Portfile

On May 18, 2012, at 03:59, Joshua Root wrote: >> Revision: 93235 >> https://trac.macports.org/changeset/93235 >> Author: pixilla at macports.org >> Date: 2012-05-17 22:15:22 -0700 (Thu, 17 May 2012) >> Log Message: >> --- >> mail/postfix: >> - Add variants for mysql51, mysq

[93235] trunk/dports/mail/postfix/Portfile

> Revision: 93235 > https://trac.macports.org/changeset/93235 > Author: pixilla at macports.org > Date: 2012-05-17 22:15:22 -0700 (Thu, 17 May 2012) > Log Message: > --- > mail/postfix: > - Add variants for mysql51, mysql55, mariadb and percona. This changeset actually cons

Re: [enhancement] proposal - make all ports independent of which version of Perl is installed or the major one

On 2012-5-18 08:30 , Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote: > 1) We still need a policy decision as to whether is should be hardcoded >as now -or- we'll use my proposal that I consider more fully >developed regarding future releases of Perl There can be a choice about which version of perl to use, it j