On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 09:54:30PM -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
There seem to be two ideas going on here:
1. ship a known good version of Tcl with MacPorts so that we avoid
bugs in versions of Tcl on specific versions of OS X
2. use Tcl 8.6 so that we can simplify some of MacPorts base
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 6:33 AM, Joshua Root j...@macports.org wrote:
On 2013-7-11 14:26 , Ryan Schmidt wrote:
Could you elaborate on the problem you encountered? I'm unsure why ld64
should have to be rebuilt just because virtualbox got updated.
I wondered that too.
On Jul 11, 2013, at 01:14, Clemens Lang wrote:
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 09:54:30PM -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
There seem to be two ideas going on here:
1. ship a known good version of Tcl with MacPorts so that we avoid
bugs in versions of Tcl on specific versions of OS X
2. use Tcl 8.6 so
On 2013-07-07 20:51, Mark Anderson wrote:
Mainly because of my troubles with a certain OSX that is not to be named
or the fiery NDA demons will smite me.
There are ways to communicate such problems to Apple for those who have
such troubles. The common measure seems to be the more reports they
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013, at 05:14 AM, Conrad Taylor wrote:
Hi, I was wondering, is there a qt5-mac port in the works? Well, I must go
and thanks in advance for any information that you can provide.
Hi Conrad - I'm cc'ing the overall dev and user's groups, since it seem
that there are a number of
Hi,
I am the author of 'cadabra', which was originally written on Linux and
uses various standard libraries on that platform, among which gtkmm and
dependencies.
For reasons that are irrelevant to this post, I cannot compile cadabra
with clang or llvm-gcc (it contains some legacy code which
Hi,
I have an open issue
https://trac.macports.org/ticket/38938
concerning a minor change to the Portfiles to make 'cadabra' work again.
This issue has been idle on the tracker for 3 months and my users keep
complaining that the version in the repos is broken.
Can someone please have a
On 11 juil. 2013, at 15:51, Michael Dickens michae...@macports.org wrote:
I haven't tried the 5.1 series
yet,
I will have a look while I am on holiday later this month, but I cannot endorse
the charge of being THE maintainer of qt5, even if I succeed: I would place the
port under the
On Jul 11, 2013, at 06:01, Rainer Müller wrote:
On 2013-07-07 20:51, Mark Anderson wrote:
Mainly because of my troubles with a certain OSX that is not to be named
or the fiery NDA demons will smite me.
There are ways to communicate such problems to Apple for those who have
such troubles.
Oh, I filed reports with apple. In fact, for anyone with troubles on any
OSX, http://bugreporter.apple.com is your best friend. Use it.
It just made me think of the idea of reducing dependencies. Especially if,
for example, we want to move to Tcl 8.X or a new cURL/Subversion, before
Apple does.
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 1:05 AM, Mark Anderson wrote:
Oh, I filed reports with apple. In fact, for anyone with troubles on any
OSX, http://bugreporter.apple.com is your best friend. Use it.
Not that I want to discourage anyone, but not any single bug that I
ever reported (I probably reported
Doh. Perhaps it works better pre-release. I certainly recommend people on
Mavericks to report early and often.
Mark
—Mark
___
Mark E. Anderson e...@emer.net
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 7:21 PM, Mojca Miklavec mo...@macports.org wrote:
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 1:05 AM, Mark
Source code and pkgs for MacPorts 2.2.0-rc1 are now
available [1]. Testing of either of these install methods is helpful.
While there are no known regressions from 2.1.3 at this point, be
prepared to encounter bugs. As always, having a recent backup would be
wise. Please report any bugs that you
13 matches
Mail list logo
