On Jun 9, 2014, at 4:14 PM, mcalh...@macports.org wrote:
> Revision
> 120845
> Author
> mcalh...@macports.org
> Date
> 2014-06-09 14:14:20 -0700 (Mon, 09 Jun 2014)
> Log Message
>
> Revision bump for icu update (r120843).
> Fixes #43959.
> --- trunk/dports/games/openttd/Portfile 2014-06-0
On Jun 9, 2014, at 10:37 AM, David Strubbe wrote:
> Why is using a patchfile instead of reinplace preferable?
If reinplace fails, it is silent, replacing nothing, and proceeds to the next
command. This is https://trac.macports.org/ticket/15514
So although the reinplace may do what you want tod
Hi Ryan,
Why is using a patchfile instead of reinplace preferable?
David
On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Ryan Schmidt
wrote:
> On Jun 5, 2014, at 12:30 PM, m...@macports.org wrote:
>
> > Revision
> > 120684
> > Author
> > m...@macports.org
> > Date
> > 2014-06-05 10:30:25 -0700 (Thu, 05 Jun 2
Mojca Miklavec , Ryan Schmidt ,
>> I would recommend that people who intend to make use of older
>hardware should do so with OSes that continue to get security updates
>
>But then again, given the low number of such users it's probably a lot
>more profitable to write malware for XP than it is for
On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 9:54 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> I have old PowerPC machines that I use for this purpose. The problem is not
> hardware; additional PowerPC machines can be acquired if they are useful to
> anyone. The problem is getting developers (both upstream and within MacPorts)
> to fix
On Jun 8, 2014, at 3:54 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> Daniel is correct that we should be encouraging users to upgrade to OS X
> versions that receive security updates from Apple. However, some old machines
> (e.g. PowerPC) machines cannot run newer versions. When the alternative is to
> throw o
