On Jul 14, 2014, at 10:09 PM, Ian Wadham wrote:
> On 15/07/2014, at 10:56 AM, Mark Brethen wrote:
>> On Jul 14, 2014, at 6:22 PM, Mark Brethen wrote:
>>
>>> I'm testing the FreeCAD build and discovered that the help menu returns the
>>> error message: "Unable to launch Qt Assistant
>>> (/opt
On 15/07/2014, at 10:56 AM, Mark Brethen wrote:
> On Jul 14, 2014, at 6:22 PM, Mark Brethen wrote:
>
>> I'm testing the FreeCAD build and discovered that the help menu returns the
>> error message: "Unable to launch Qt Assistant
>> (/opt/local/bin/Assistant.app/Contents/MacOS/Assistant)". Laun
On Jul 14, 2014, at 6:22 PM, Mark Brethen wrote:
> I'm testing the FreeCAD build and discovered that the help menu returns the
> error message: "Unable to launch Qt Assistant
> (/opt/local/bin/Assistant.app/Contents/MacOS/Assistant)". Launching Qt
> Assistant is done in the function startAss
I'm testing the FreeCAD build and discovered that the help menu returns the
error message: "Unable to launch Qt Assistant
(/opt/local/bin/Assistant.app/Contents/MacOS/Assistant)". Launching Qt
Assistant is done in the function startAssistant() which is found in
src/Gui/Assistant.cpp. The follo
On 7/14/14 8:56 AM, Jonathan Stickel wrote:
> In ticket #42980 (https://trac.macports.org/ticket/42980), a request
> was made to allow inkscape-textext (a latex extension for inkscape) to
> work with both inkscape and inkscape-devel. I provide a simple patch
> there to change the dependency to be b
In ticket #42980 (https://trac.macports.org/ticket/42980), a request was
made to allow inkscape-textext (a latex extension for inkscape) to work
with both inkscape and inkscape-devel. I provide a simple patch there to
change the dependency to be be a path dependency. Would a developer
please re
Curious; I was aiming for warnings, instead of errors.
Were you installing the +mactex variant?
{{{
sudo port install latexml +mactex
}}}
That's expected to give a warning about violating the macports
filesystem layout, *but* the 2nd message should have said that
it was installing style files in ma
It is syntactically acceptable to not list a license version, but that means
that any license version is acceptable. The LICENSE file in the impacket 0.9.11
tarball described the Apache license version 1.1 so I assumed that was the
version it's actually licensed under.
The only list of licenses
On Jul 14, 2014, at 3:30 AM, jerem...@macports.org wrote:
> Revision
> 122077
> Author
> jerem...@macports.org
> Date
> 2014-07-14 01:30:09 -0700 (Mon, 14 Jul 2014)
> Log Message
>
> libffi: Revert my previous change for now. I messed up the asm and will get
> the proper fix later. At least w
