- On 23 Feb, 2015, at 23:34, René J.V. Bertin rjvber...@gmail.com wrote:
> It intercepts all (file open and similar) system calls and then checks against
> the installed files database, possibly for each and every header file included
> (which often means the same header file multiple times)
On Monday February 23 2015 16:51:15 Jeremy Lavergne wrote:
> As someone routinely using trace mode across 10.5 to 10.10, I've run into
> no significant impacts. I greatly appreciate all it provides, and all
It intercepts all (file open and similar) system calls and then checks against
the instal
On Mon, February 23, 2015 16:50, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> Sure. As I said, I'd probably appreciate for certain things, but not as a
> mandatory feature.
>
> I have a hunch that it'd add non-negligible overhead too, if it's to be
> used in as many stages as possible.
As someone routinely using tra
On Monday February 23 2015 11:00:43 Lawrence Velázquez wrote:
I don't see us ever making trace mode mandatory, but we would eventually like
to make it the default mode of operation. And if a port fails to build under
trace mode, we consider that a bug in the port.
Sure. As I said, I'd probably
On Feb 23, 2015, at 10:18 AM, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> Ugh. Just make it optional (as in "can be turned off"), ok? ...
I don't see us ever making trace mode mandatory, but we would eventually like
to make it the default mode of operation. And if a port fails to build under
trace mode, we cons
> On Feb 23, 2015, at 10:18 AM, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> On Monday February 23 2015 09:19:35 Brandon Allbery wrote:
>>> How can it do that without deactivating everything that's not somehow a
>>> dependency (and thus making it impossible to do anything while an install
>>> is being done), or by d
On Monday February 23 2015 09:19:35 Brandon Allbery wrote:
> > How can it do that without deactivating everything that's not somehow a
> > dependency (and thus making it impossible to do anything while an install
> > is being done), or by duplicating potentially a huge portion of the entire
> > Ma
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 9:18 AM, René J.V. wrote:
> How can it do that without deactivating everything that's not somehow a
> dependency (and thus making it impossible to do anything while an install
> is being done), or by duplicating potentially a huge portion of the entire
> MacPorts tree?
B
On Monday February 23 2015 05:22:50 Mihai Moldovan wrote:
> Please don't do this. Tracemode will shadow any files from packages not
> explicitly listed as a dependency. Builds in tracemode will thus
> fail/not recognize harfbuzz at all, even if it installed.
How can it do that without deactivatin
On Feb 20, 2015, at 4:34 AM, petr <9...@ingv.it> wrote:
> I saw that in r132950 and r132951 you corrected the error I introduced
> with r132349. Thanks for this and sorry for the extra effort!
No worries.
> However, I would like to better understand what went wrong and how am
> I supposed to act
10 matches
Mail list logo
