Sent from my iPhone...
> On Sep 12, 2016, at 21:44, Brandon Allbery wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 12:24 AM, Jeremy Sequoia wrote:
>>> I just noticed this. Received wisdom "out here" is that ``nobody is
>>> listening and nobody ever responds, so don't bother filing radars.''
>>
>> Th
On Sep 12, 2016, at 23:45, Ken Cunningham
wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I thought I'd work on a new requested port, sshuttle. Looks like something I
> might want to use myself.
>
> I have it downloading, building, and running from the build folder, but there
> is no "make install" component. In the
Hi all,
I thought I'd work on a new requested port, sshuttle. Looks like something I
might want to use myself.
I have it downloading, building, and running from the build folder, but there
is no "make install" component. In the build folder after the build there turns
out to be a small mac app
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 12:24 AM, Jeremy Sequoia wrote:
> I just noticed this. Received wisdom "out here" is that ``nobody is
> listening and nobody ever responds, so don't bother filing radars.''
>
>
> That is very very very false.
>
That may be, but I got paraphrases of that response from a nu
Sent from my iPhone...
> On Sep 12, 2016, at 20:57, Brandon Allbery wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 12:14 PM, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia
>> wrote:
>> Please file radars and point me to them, so I can make sure they get routed
>> to the right place (likely as dupes, but dupes are very use
On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 12:14 PM, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia <
jerem...@apple.com> wrote:
> Please file radars and point me to them, so I can make sure they get
> routed to the right place (likely as dupes, but dupes are very useful
> "votes" for bugs).
I just noticed this. Received wisdom "out h
> On Sep 12, 2016, at 7:46 AM, Rainer Müller wrote:
>
> On 2016-09-12 04:17, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>> {
>>"workers": {
>>"10.5_ppc": {
>>"base": ""
>>},
>>"10.5_ppc_legacy": {
>>"ports": ""
>>},
>>"10.6_x86_64": {
>>"b
Fixed in r152601. I flubbed the commit message, though. Only human.
- Eric
On Monday, September 12, 2016, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> > On Sep 8, 2016, at 11:28 PM, ebori...@macports.org wrote:
> >
> > Revision
> > 152440
> > Author
> > ebori...@macports.org
> > Date
> > 2016-09-08 21:28:04 -07
> On Sep 8, 2016, at 11:28 PM, ebori...@macports.org wrote:
>
> Revision
> 152440
> Author
> ebori...@macports.org
> Date
> 2016-09-08 21:28:04 -0700 (Thu, 08 Sep 2016)
> Log Message
>
> zabbix3: New port.
> Modified Paths
>
> • trunk/dports/net/zabbix3/Portfile
> +patchfiles lo
> On Sep 12, 2016, at 4:01 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> On Sep 12, 2016, at 2:54 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
>> On Sep 12, 2016, at 2:53 PM, Lawrence Velázquez wrote:
>>
>>> Does anyone know whether the python26-apple.mtln and python27-apple.mtln
>>> schemes still apply to Sierra?
>>
>> How can
On Sep 12, 2016, at 2:54 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> On Sep 12, 2016, at 2:53 PM, Lawrence Velázquez wrote:
>
>> Does anyone know whether the python26-apple.mtln and python27-apple.mtln
>> schemes still apply to Sierra?
>
> How can I verify that's the case? Just check that each file listed in tho
> On Sep 12, 2016, at 2:53 PM, Lawrence Velázquez wrote:
>
> Does anyone know whether the python26-apple.mtln and python27-apple.mtln
> schemes still apply to Sierra?
How can I verify that's the case? Just check that each file listed in those
files exists?
___
> On Sep 12, 2016, at 3:45 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> This takes care of adding the necessary bits for Sierra, yes?
>
> Do we need to revbump for any early adopters who already had this port
> installed?
Hm, that hadn't occurred to me; I was just backporting a change I had made
earlier for p
> On Sep 12, 2016, at 11:22 AM, lar...@macports.org wrote:
>
> Revision
> 152558
> Author
> lar...@macports.org
> Date
> 2016-09-12 09:22:25 -0700 (Mon, 12 Sep 2016)
> Log Message
>
> python_select: Refactor to reduce repetition
> Modified Paths
>
> • trunk/dports/sysutils/python_select/P
On Sep 12, 2016, at 2:14 PM, c...@macports.org wrote:
>
> Revision
> 152581
> Author
> c...@macports.org
> Date
> 2016-09-12 12:14:24 -0700 (Mon, 12 Sep 2016)
> Log Message
>
> mp-buildbot: Don't re-run previously failed builds
>
> If a port's build has previously failed, we do not want to waste
On 2016-09-12 14:41, Clemens Lang wrote:
> here's a patch against mp-buildbot that would add a fail cache for use
> on the buildbots. Unfortunately I don't have a test setup yet, so I'm
> hesitating to commit this immediately. I'd welcome feedback, a code
> review, or testing by somebody with a wor
On 2016-09-12 04:17, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> {
> "workers": {
> "10.5_ppc": {
> "base": ""
> },
> "10.5_ppc_legacy": {
> "ports": ""
> },
> "10.6_x86_64": {
> "base": "",
> "ports": ""
> },
> "
Hi,
here's a patch against mp-buildbot that would add a fail cache for use
on the buildbots. Unfortunately I don't have a test setup yet, so I'm
hesitating to commit this immediately. I'd welcome feedback, a code
review, or testing by somebody with a working builbot setup.
Basically, I'm keeping
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 10:53:04AM +0200, Rainer Müller wrote:
> The 'return' just skips everything else in this step, so that would be
> covered.
Yes, sorry, I haven't had my coffee yet.
> Another solution would be to run selfupdate before the cleanup step to
> ensure we always cleanup with
On 2016-09-12 10:41, Clemens Lang wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 11:47:58AM -0700, rai...@macports.org wrote:
>> Revision: 152507
>> https://trac.macports.org/changeset/152507
>> Author: rai...@macports.org
>> Date: 2016-09-11 11:47:58 -0700 (Sun, 11 Sep 2016)
>> Log Message:
>> -
Hi,
On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 11:47:58AM -0700, rai...@macports.org wrote:
> Revision: 152507
> https://trac.macports.org/changeset/152507
> Author: rai...@macports.org
> Date: 2016-09-11 11:47:58 -0700 (Sun, 11 Sep 2016)
> Log Message:
> ---
> buildbot: skip cleanup if port
21 matches
Mail list logo