On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 04:50:41PM -0600, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
[snip]
Please declare dependencies on cairo and pango using path style so that
cairo-devel and pango-devel could satisfy them:
path:lib/pkgconfig/cairo.pc:cairo
path:lib/pkgconfig/pango.pc:pango
Done, r128115.
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 10:17:39AM -0400, Jeremy Lavergne wrote:
invert most variants to be no_* so default build will have them
i.e. ipv6 is now included by default, +no_ipv6 turns off ipv6 support
We're trying to get rid of the no_* variants.
-no_ipv6 is how the user could
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 09:07:58PM +0200, Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote:
http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-dev/2012-May/019336.html
http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-dev/2012-May/019338.html
It's now been almost a week with no activity in this thread
and no resolution in
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 09:20:31PM +0200, Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote:
Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote:
Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote:
I'll have some stat shortly as to how many which ports we are talking
about.
++
+ ports dependent on Perl 5.12
+
PsyncX
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 03:44:08AM +0200, Clemens Lang wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 06:05:45PM -0700, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
I do not recall why but at some point I needed perl5.12 +threads
+shared and after upgrading perl5.12 with these variants NONE of my
perl modules were found.
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 01:06:57AM +0200, Clemens Lang wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 01:10:12PM -0700, ri...@macports.org wrote:
wireshark: remove potentially dangerous notes
-notes To allow non-root users capturing packages, make sure your
$prefix/bin/dumpcap is owned by root\
Please do not alter ports that do not have
openmaintainer or nomaintainer without either approval
from the maintainer or a timeout.
-eric
___
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 02:29:59PM -0800, Dan Ports wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 02:41:57PM -0500, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
+1 from me. It would probably also be a good idea to make it perl5.14
+threads (and if a non-threaded perl is needed, it should probably be a
separate port) at the
I think it's high (well past, very much so, etc.) time
to move perl5 to perl5.14. If anyone has a reason *not* to
do so, please let me know by the end of this week (20Jan2012).
-eric
___
macports-dev mailing list
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 11:54:29PM -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Oct 23, 2011, at 23:46, ri...@macports.org wrote:
Revision: 86264
http://trac.macports.org/changeset/86264
Author: ri...@macports.org
Date: 2011-10-23 21:46:34 -0700 (Sun, 23 Oct 2011)
Log Message:
[resending with the correct from addr for the list...]
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 10:05:14AM +1100, Joshua Root wrote:
On 2010-12-7 02:17 , Daniel J. Luke wrote:
On Dec 4, 2010, at 7:41 PM, Jeremy Lavergne wrote:
ricci and narf_tm (and whoever knows which port should take precedence):
I
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 03:05:08PM +0200, Rainer M??ller wrote:
On 2010-10-13 15:01 , rai...@macports.org wrote:
Revision: 72401
http://trac.macports.org/changeset/72401
Author: rai...@macports.org
Date: 2010-10-13 06:01:02 -0700 (Wed, 13 Oct 2010)
Log Message:
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 12:45:52PM -0400, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
On Oct 13, 2010, at 12:27 PM, Eric Hall wrote:
Doh! Yes, I'll add reminders for that. If anyone has
ideas on how to get the version from the perl5.* portfiles that
would (seem to) be a better way to go about
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 02:58:13PM -0400, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
On Oct 13, 2010, at 2:37 PM, Eric Hall wrote:
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 12:45:52PM -0400, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
On Oct 13, 2010, at 12:27 PM, Eric Hall wrote:
Doh! Yes, I'll add reminders for that. If anyone has
ideas
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 06:47:13PM -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Oct 13, 2010, at 11:33, ri...@macports.org wrote:
Revision: 72404
http://trac.macports.org/changeset/72404
Author: ri...@macports.org
Date: 2010-10-13 09:33:20 -0700 (Wed, 13 Oct 2010)
Log Message:
On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 08:32:42AM -0400, Jeremy Lavergne wrote:
Should we include dependencies for a port if they are only used during the
test phase?
Sounds like a variation of the build-time dependencies,
I'd put them into that grouping vs. run-time dependencies.
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 06:15:05PM +0200, Rainer M?ller wrote:
On 07/30/2010 12:24 PM, Thomas Keller wrote:
Am 30.07.10 07:53, schrieb Rainer M?ller:
As the ticket was sitting 6 months without attention should we call port
abandonement for parrot?
I'd vote for a less bureaucratic way
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 09:33:09AM -0700, ryandes...@macports.org wrote:
Revision: 70035
http://trac.macports.org/changeset/70035
Author: ryandes...@macports.org
Date: 2010-07-27 09:33:08 -0700 (Tue, 27 Jul 2010)
Log Message:
---
ImageMagick: delete +perl variant;
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 11:57:40AM -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Jul 27, 2010, at 11:50, Eric Hall wrote:
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 09:33:09AM -0700, ryandes...@macports.org wrote:
Revision: 70035
http://trac.macports.org/changeset/70035
Author: ryandes...@macports.org
Date
On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 09:00:14PM -0500, Jeremy Lavergne wrote:
When do we plan to shift the default perl version to 5.10?
If the timing of the next release is relevant, we've received a submission
for 5.12-devel (#22438).
I made some changes to the perl5 and perl5.10 ports
to
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 05:31:14PM -0500, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
On Nov 13, 2009, at 4:58 PM, Eric Hall wrote:
The basic idea is to have perl5 continue to
default to perl5.8
This is probably OK for now, but we should really think about just defaulting
to perl 5.10 ...
Yes
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 03:55:14PM -0700, Scott Haneda wrote:
[snip]
Can you find the ISP? I do not think there would be a lot of luck
hitting up register.com, as domain take downs are a nasty road to go
down.
DNS says the IP is '208.185.168.32', which is in space
allocated to
On Sat, Oct 03, 2009 at 06:51:55PM -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
[snip]
Perhaps you could speak with the owners of that server about making it
pingable.
I wouldn't bother, people who block ICMP echo
usually do so for a reason and are unlikely to open it
up just because somebody
On Sun, Oct 04, 2009 at 06:20:34PM -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Oct 4, 2009, at 14:39, Scott Haneda wrote:
On Oct 3, 2009, at 3:18 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
This is not perfect because as you say some servers might not
respond to pings (though hopefully that's rare), and some servers
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 10:25:03PM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote:
I am running into an issue with MacPort's that
seems rather odd. My system shell is set to tcsh
and and I have the normal entries in my .cshrc of...
##
# Your previous /Users/howarth/.cshrc file was backed up as
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 07:38:15PM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote:
There is hope! We have an analysis of the exact
breakage in eh under 10.6 for gcc trunk...
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2009-September/025908.html
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 07:57:53PM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote:
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 11:46:57PM +, Eric Hall wrote:
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 07:38:15PM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote:
There is hope! We have an analysis of the exact
breakage in eh under 10.6 for gcc trunk...
http
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 06:20:13PM -0700, ryandes...@macports.org wrote:
Revision: 57743
http://trac.macports.org/changeset/57743
Author: ryandes...@macports.org
Date: 2009-09-15 18:20:06 -0700 (Tue, 15 Sep 2009)
Log Message:
---
ImageMagick: update to 6.5.6-1 to fix
On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 09:28:23PM +, Marcus Calhoun-Lopez wrote:
Now that the very useful change of reversing @INC has been made r48955,
will there be a rule of thumb for p5 dependencies already provided by perl5?
Option 1: Only have the dependency if the newer version is needed.
Option
FYI-
I just committed the changes to perl5.8 to alter @INC
and change the man page locations and extensions.
I think that perl5.10 should get the same @INC
alteration, not so sure about the man page stuff for it.
If there are no (reported) problems after a bit, I'll
change perl5.10
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 06:23:33AM -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Mar 27, 2009, at 06:19, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
Wouldn't you say that no port should ever override the checksum
phase? If there are distfiles, their checksums must be validated,
and if there are no distfiles, then the checksum
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 09:22:41AM -0700, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
/usr/share/man/man3/CGI.3pm.gz is found before /opt/local/share/
perl5.8/man/man3p/CGI.3pm even when MANPATH looks like this:
/opt/local/share/man:/usr/share/man:/usr/X11/man:/usr/local/share/man
I'm not saying I like this
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 10:25:05AM -0700, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
On Mar 13, 2009, at 9:41 AM, Eric Hall wrote:
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 09:22:41AM -0700, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
[snip]
Aren't we already adding macports /opt/local/share/man to MANPATH?
No, /opt/local/share/man
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 03:21:11PM -0700, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
On Mar 10, 2009, at 5:24 PM, Eric Hall wrote:
[snip]
I've attached a set of patches to:
http://trac.macports.org/ticket/12950#comment:14
for testing. So far so good for me.
-eric
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 11:29:35AM -0700, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
On Mar 10, 2009, at 5:24 PM, Eric Hall wrote:
[snip]
I've attached a set of patches to:
http://trac.macports.org/ticket/12950#comment:14
for testing. So far so good for me.
I'm testing your
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 01:19:12AM +, Marcus Calhoun-Lopez wrote:
Eric Hall opendarwin@... writes:
Given that MP installs (most) modules into vendor_perl,
I think the order should be:
site, vendor, then perl base/core.
I like the line(s) you have for showing
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 07:02:06PM -0700, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
On Mar 9, 2009, at 5:27 PM, Marcus Calhoun-Lopez wrote:
Eric Hall opendarwin@... writes:
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 02:03:57PM -0700, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
I have played around with my perl5.8 port and I have what
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 08:34:54PM +, Marcus Calhoun-Lopez wrote:
Eric Hall opendarwin@... writes:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 01:19:12AM +, Marcus Calhoun-Lopez wrote:
Although I do not feel strongly about it, I would still vote for the order
site, perl base/core, vendor
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 07:08:56PM -0700, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
[snip]
Thank you very much for participating in this process that matters a
lot to me :)
Its good timing, this problem has been building up for
awhile now and I've finally got some time to spend on it (and
it
[snip]
I've attached a set of patches to:
http://trac.macports.org/ticket/12950#comment:14
for testing. So far so good for me.
-eric
___
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 02:41:50AM +, Marcus Calhoun-Lopez wrote:
Bradley Giesbrecht b...@... writes:
Thank you for the clarification.
If I understand what is being discussed (please correct me if I'm
wrong),
we would
* copy perl5.8 - perl5.8-core.
* create a port
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 02:03:57PM -0700, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
I have played around with my perl5.8 port and I have what appears to
me to be a solution to the path collision/registry issue.
I modified my perl5.8 Portfile like so:
configure.args-append -D
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 12:27:39AM +, Marcus Calhoun-Lopez wrote:
Eric Hall opendarwin@... writes:
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 02:03:57PM -0700, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
I have played around with my perl5.8 port and I have what appears to
me to be a solution to the path
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 01:53:39AM +, Marcus Calhoun-Lopez wrote:
Eric Hall opendarwin@... writes:
[snip]
Overall I agree there is a problem with the way that
perl (at least perl5.8) and modules (p5-*) currently interact, and
we need a good (great? sufficient?) solution
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 08:21:10PM -0800, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
On Mar 3, 2009, at 4:22 PM, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
Situation: I removed macports and reinstalled using the macports
wiki recommended methods.
I installed perl5.8 and only perl5.8 using all variants.
I looked for and
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 02:15:30AM -0600, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
I can't install php5 on one of my machines. As a maintainer of php5,
this is a bit of a problem. I also can't upgrade libxml2. The error
is different everytime but often it's sh that crashes, and often the
error message
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 11:38:02AM -0800, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
This patch touches the 252 ports (listed at bottom) which depend on
X11 with a lib: style dependency. It changes these to port:
dependencies. If it was lib:...:XFree86 or lib:...:xorg, the new
dependency is
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 06:04:46PM -0800, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
On Jan 19, 2009, at 15:58, Eric Hall wrote:
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 11:38:02AM -0800, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
This patch touches the 252 ports (listed at bottom) which depend on
X11 with a lib: style dependency
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:22:14PM -0700, Bryan Blackburn wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 05:08:09AM +, Eric Hall said:
[snip]
I figured all of them, in case people want to use
the system installed X11. Perhaps I misunderstood something
in the various emails, I thought
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 12:31:19PM -0800, ma...@macports.org wrote:
Hello all,
I have two problems.
1) I installed the new perl 5.8.9 and now a port I used to install (one of
my own - sympa) says it won't install because DB_File is not found. Was
that included in perl 5.8.8?
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 02:34:01AM -0600, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Nov 21, 2008, at 00:09, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+set distbaseQScintilla-gpl-${version}
+distfiles ${distbase}.tar.gz
+master_siteshttp://www.riverbankcomputing.com/static/
Downloads/QScintilla2/
+
On Sat, Nov 01, 2008 at 04:21:54PM -0700, David Evans wrote:
I'm not sure what the agenda is with the new perl5 port but if the idea
is to eventually replace port perl5.8 with it then ports that depend on
perl5.8 shouldn't be changed to perl5 (even with a path dependency)
until we're ready
On Sat, Nov 01, 2008 at 10:17:02PM -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Nov 1, 2008, at 21:49, Eric Hall wrote:
Why do we have a perl5 port alongside the perl5.8 and perl5.10
ports? If its breaking things it seems to me we shouldn't have a
plain
'perl5' port until we're ready to make
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 01:11:19AM -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
[snip]
There are those who complain when ports cannot be installed by non-
root and then we end up adding +no_startupitem variants, like the
apache2 port has. Comments on this?
I think splitting a port into 'plain'
On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 01:46:17PM +0200, C. Florian Ebeling wrote:
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 12:04 PM, Ryan Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 2, 2008, at 4:51 AM, Rainer M??ller wrote:
Ryan Schmidt wrote:
I think the discussion was about changing the maintainer timeout, not
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 01:16:29PM -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Aug 21, 2008, at 12:52, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Revision: 39476
http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/changeset/39476
Author: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008-08-21 10:52:30 -0700 (Thu, 21 Aug 2008)
Log
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 06:03:59PM -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Jul 19, 2008, at 15:14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Revision: 38422
http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/changeset/38422
Author: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008-07-19 13:14:07 -0700 (Sat, 19 Jul 2008)
Log
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 06:27:53PM -0400, Randall Wood wrote:
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 5:46 PM, Ryan Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When closing a ticket in Trac, I can select from the following
resolutions:
fixed
invalid
wontfix
duplicate
worksforme
More often than I would
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 11:30:08PM -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Jun 18, 2008, at 10:17 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+
+
+
+#
+##EOF
Why do you add this to the end of your ports? You have this in
ethereal, wireshark, afflib, aimage, libewf, metasploit2, metasploit3
and now
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 09:42:27PM -0700, Blair Zajac wrote:
Eric Hall wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 11:30:08PM -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Jun 18, 2008, at 10:17 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+
+
+
+#
+##EOF
Why do you add this to the end of your ports? You have this in
ethereal
Macports perl installs use the default @INC [1], which
can lead to problems if a perl module requires a newer version
of a (perl) Core module than what shipped with that version of
perl.
One example is MIME::Tools, which requires File::Temp
of 0.18 or greater (in 5.426, 5.425
On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 02:02:57AM -0700, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
On Apr 1, 2008, at 1:27 AM, Florian Ebeling wrote:
Maybe I'm too ignorant, but isn't also the fact that dependencies
are version-agnostic one major cause of build fails and probably a
cost-effective gain to change?
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 06:46:31AM -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Mar 26, 2008, at 11:03, James Berry wrote:
I agree fully with Landon. The automated lint on submit should be
limited, if even allowed, to severe errors that will cause the port
to be unusable. We have enough of a hard
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 06:42:35AM -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Mar 26, 2008, at 11:28, Anders F Bj?rklund wrote:
Landon Fuller wrote:
On Mar 26, 2008, at 12:13 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
Patchfile naming: The old guide was contradictory, and in one place,
recommended the naming
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 11:45:12AM -0700, Landon Fuller wrote:
On Mar 25, 2008, at 11:40 AM, Blair Zajac wrote:
Landon Fuller wrote:
On Mar 25, 2008, at 11:31 AM, Blair Zajac wrote:
Landon Fuller wrote:
On Mar 25, 2008, at 11:25 AM, Blair Zajac wrote:
How long does it take to fix
There's now a ticket with a patch to reduce
'port lint' pedantry:
http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/ticket/14799
-eric
___
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 03:48:56PM -0800, James Berry wrote:
I'm writing to attempt to gauge interest in whether and how MacPorts
should participate in Google Summer of Code (GSoC) for 2008. See
http://code.google.com/soc/2008/
.
You might be inclined to address any of the following
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 08:52:34AM -0800, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
I think this really begins to stretch the notion of maintainer. He
wants a week, you want two weeks, some other maintainers will probably
say they want a month, before long you have a lot of ports being held
hostage
On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 04:36:12AM +0100, Rainer M?ller wrote:
js wrote:
As you know, MD5 has serious flaws (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MD5)
So recently I don't use it and even remove it when I found it in the
checksum part of portfile.
I thought dropping use of md5 in portfile would
On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 04:17:53PM -0800, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
Hey all,
I was just looking at the ghc port a few days ago, mostly in an
attempt to figure out why it a-splode! on my 10.5 PPC system, and I
noticed a lot of this:
platform darwin 7 powerpc { ... }
platform darwin 8
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 02:58:35AM -0600, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Jan 17, 2008, at 02:46, Anders F Bj?rklund wrote:
Ryan Schmidt wrote:
Also, it would be more universal if it was to use the 10.4u SDK
on Leopard too, since then the generated binaries would work on
Tiger in addition.
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 04:15:22PM -0600, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Jan 8, 2008, at 15:51, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Modified: trunk/dports/print/libpaper/Portfile
===
--- trunk/dports/print/libpaper/Portfile 2008-01-08 21:48:43
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 03:35:54PM -0600, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
Some comments...
On Dec 7, 2007, at 13:12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Added: trunk/dports/security/afflib/Portfile
===
--- trunk/dports/security/afflib/Portfile
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 07:06:18PM +, Eric Hall wrote:
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 04:22:12AM -0500, Randall Wood wrote:
The assumption that a user wants the entire X11 stack installed for
him is not deterministically true. I will not and can not force a
user to install X11 if they do
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 04:54:40PM -0500, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
On Nov 29, 2007, at 3:09 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
This is breaking installs of wireshark (and I expect
other ports that depend on gtk2) where the user doesn't have gtk2
installed already. Unless a mechanism to define the
On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 06:12:28PM -0500, Jon Passki wrote:
Hey All,
This patch will allow wireshark to decode SSL and TLS packets [1].
Tested with clean --all wireshark, configure, and install. Tested
against test SSL data [2], decoded HTTP session.
Committed as a variant
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 02:24:41PM -0400, Juan Manuel Palacios wrote:
Up until now we've uploaded tarballs and other distfiles to our
distfiles section in svn to user named directories, together with a /
distfiles/general dir for unmaintained ports. It's been discussed
that using
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 09:31:25AM -0400, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
On Jun 21, 2007, at 5:35 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
Is MacPorts officially no longer supporting Jaguar?
Our policy (from quite a while ago) is to support the current Mac OS
X major release, and the one previous to it (so
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 02:37:27AM -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On May 30, 2007, at 02:05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
+checksums md5 90298105cd17a5c2a4059297e09f1546
+platforms darwin
+
+## # Depends on these Perl modules
+## depends_lib-append
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 12:54:33PM -0700, Blair Zajac wrote:
The scala tarball doesn't extract into a new subdirectory and instead
just extracts into the directory where you run tar, i.e. a tarbomb. So
in work/, you see a bin/ and a share/ directory.
Is there an easy, clean way to deal
On Sat, Mar 31, 2007 at 12:40:42PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FYI, there are only 8 ports left that depend upon DarwinPortsStartup.
net/net-snmp
Make it 7, I just removed DarwinPortsStartup from net/net-snmp.
Its replacement is fake/dummy items, but the dependency is gone. Feel
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 10:55:12PM +0530, Anant Narayanan wrote:
What kind of projects do you have in mind for the Summer of Code people
to take on?
The project I personally was planning on doing was an official GUI for
MacPorts. Currently, there's only a non-free (in all senses of the
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 01:42:47PM +, Charlie Allom wrote:
either this or the .94 bump broke my wireshark configure.
configure:21540: result: no
configure:21573: gcc -o conftest -no-cpp-precomp -D_U_=__attribute__
((unused)) -Wall -Wpointer-arith -W -g -O2 -I/opt/local/include/
83 matches
Mail list logo
