On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 04:50:41PM -0600, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
[snip]
>
> Please declare dependencies on cairo and pango using path style so that
> cairo-devel and pango-devel could satisfy them:
>
> path:lib/pkgconfig/cairo.pc:cairo
>
> path:lib/pkgconfig/pango.pc:pango
>
>
Done,
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 10:17:39AM -0400, Jeremy Lavergne wrote:
> > invert most variants to be no_* so default build will have them
> > i.e. ipv6 is now included by default, +no_ipv6 turns off ipv6 support
>
> We're trying to get rid of the no_* variants.
>
> -no_ipv6 is how the user could
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 09:07:58PM +0200, Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote:
> http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-dev/2012-May/019336.html
> http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-dev/2012-May/019338.html
>
> It's now been almost a week with no activity in this thread
> and no resolutio
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 03:44:08AM +0200, Clemens Lang wrote:
> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 06:05:45PM -0700, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
> > I do not recall why but at some point I needed "perl5.12 +threads
> > +shared" and after upgrading perl5.12 with these variants NONE of my
> > perl modules were f
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 09:20:31PM +0200, Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote:
> Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote:
> > Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote:
> >> I'll have some stat shortly as to how many & which ports we are talking
> >> about.
> >
> > ++
> > + ports dependent on Perl 5.12
>
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 01:06:57AM +0200, Clemens Lang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 01:10:12PM -0700, ri...@macports.org wrote:
> > wireshark: remove potentially dangerous "notes"
> >
> > -notes "To allow non-root users capturing packages, make sure your
> > $prefix/bin/dumpcap is ow
Please do not alter ports that do not have
openmaintainer or nomaintainer without either approval
from the maintainer or a timeout.
-eric
___
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailm
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 02:29:59PM -0800, Dan Ports wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 02:41:57PM -0500, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
> > +1 from me. It would probably also be a good idea to make it perl5.14
> > +threads (and if a non-threaded perl is needed, it should probably be a
> > separate port) at
I think it's high (well past, very much so, etc.) time
to move perl5 to perl5.14. If anyone has a reason *not* to
do so, please let me know by the end of this week (20Jan2012).
-eric
___
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@l
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 11:54:29PM -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> On Oct 23, 2011, at 23:46, ri...@macports.org wrote:
>
> > Revision: 86264
> > http://trac.macports.org/changeset/86264
> > Author: ri...@macports.org
> > Date: 2011-10-23 21:46:34 -0700 (Sun, 23 Oct 2011)
> > Log Me
[resending with the correct from addr for the list...]
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 10:05:14AM +1100, Joshua Root wrote:
> On 2010-12-7 02:17 , Daniel J. Luke wrote:
> > On Dec 4, 2010, at 7:41 PM, Jeremy Lavergne wrote:
> >>
> >> ricci and narf_tm (and whoever knows which port should take precedence):
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 06:47:13PM -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> On Oct 13, 2010, at 11:33, ri...@macports.org wrote:
>
> > Revision: 72404
> > http://trac.macports.org/changeset/72404
> > Author: ri...@macports.org
> > Date: 2010-10-13 09:33:20 -0700 (Wed, 13 Oct 2010)
> > Log Messa
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 02:58:13PM -0400, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
> On Oct 13, 2010, at 2:37 PM, Eric Hall wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 12:45:52PM -0400, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
> >> On Oct 13, 2010, at 12:27 PM, Eric Hall wrote:
> >>>
> >>&g
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 12:45:52PM -0400, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
> On Oct 13, 2010, at 12:27 PM, Eric Hall wrote:
> >
> > Doh! Yes, I'll add reminders for that. If anyone has
> > ideas on how to get the version from the perl5.* portfiles that
> > would (seem
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 03:05:08PM +0200, Rainer M??ller wrote:
> On 2010-10-13 15:01 , rai...@macports.org wrote:
> > Revision: 72401
> > http://trac.macports.org/changeset/72401
> > Author: rai...@macports.org
> > Date: 2010-10-13 06:01:02 -0700 (Wed, 13 Oct 2010)
> > Log Message:
On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 08:32:42AM -0400, Jeremy Lavergne wrote:
> Should we include dependencies for a port if they are only used during the
> test phase?
>
Sounds like a variation of the build-time dependencies,
I'd put them into that grouping vs. run-time dependencies.
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 06:15:05PM +0200, Rainer M?ller wrote:
> On 07/30/2010 12:24 PM, Thomas Keller wrote:
> > Am 30.07.10 07:53, schrieb Rainer M?ller:
> >> As the ticket was sitting 6 months without attention should we call port
> >> abandonement for parrot?
> >
> > I'd vote for a less bureau
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 11:57:40AM -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> On Jul 27, 2010, at 11:50, Eric Hall wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 09:33:09AM -0700, ryandes...@macports.org wrote:
> >> Revision: 70035
> >> http://trac.macports.org/chang
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 09:33:09AM -0700, ryandes...@macports.org wrote:
> Revision: 70035
> http://trac.macports.org/changeset/70035
> Author: ryandes...@macports.org
> Date: 2010-07-27 09:33:08 -0700 (Tue, 27 Jul 2010)
> Log Message:
> ---
> ImageMagick: delete +perl varia
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 07:15:47PM -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
[snip]
> For another, I'm unsure we really need sha256 checksums in there. It's
> already complete overkill that we're putting three different checksums; using
> four verges on crazy. The only reason we put more than one checksum at a
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 03:07:43PM -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> On Jun 22, 2010, at 11:15, ri...@macports.org wrote:
>
> > Revision: 69061
> > http://trac.macports.org/changeset/69061
> > Author: ri...@macports.org
> > Date: 2010-06-22 09:15:09 -0700 (Tue, 22 Jun 2010)
> > Log Me
On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 06:07:28PM +1000, Joshua Root wrote:
> On 2010-6-7 07:57 , Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> > Before we release 1.9.0 we should probably resolve this situation, which
> > seems to be a step backward from 1.8.2 behavior:
> >
> > http://trac.macports.org/ticket/25156
> >
> > If MacPor
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 05:31:14PM -0500, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
> On Nov 13, 2009, at 4:58 PM, Eric Hall wrote:
> > The basic idea is to have perl5 continue to
> > default to perl5.8
>
> This is probably OK for now, but we should really think about just defau
On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 09:00:14PM -0500, Jeremy Lavergne wrote:
> When do we plan to shift the default perl version to 5.10?
>
> If the timing of the next release is relevant, we've received a submission
> for 5.12-devel (#22438).
>
I made some changes to the perl5 and perl5.10 ports
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 03:55:14PM -0700, Scott Haneda wrote:
[snip]
>
> Can you find the ISP? I do not think there would be a lot of luck
> hitting up register.com, as domain take downs are a nasty road to go
> down.
DNS says the IP is '208.185.168.32', which is in space
allocated t
On Sun, Oct 04, 2009 at 06:20:34PM -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> On Oct 4, 2009, at 14:39, Scott Haneda wrote:
>
> >On Oct 3, 2009, at 3:18 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> >
> >>This is not perfect because as you say some servers might not
> >>respond to pings (though hopefully that's rare), and some s
On Sat, Oct 03, 2009 at 06:51:55PM -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
[snip]
>
> Perhaps you could speak with the owners of that server about making it
> pingable.
>
I wouldn't bother, people who block ICMP echo
usually do so for a reason and are unlikely to open it
up just because somebody el
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 10:25:03PM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote:
>I am running into an issue with MacPort's that
> seems rather odd. My system shell is set to tcsh
> and and I have the normal entries in my .cshrc of...
>
> ##
> # Your previous /Users/howarth/.cshrc file was backed up as
> /Users
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 07:57:53PM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 11:46:57PM +0000, Eric Hall wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 07:38:15PM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote:
> > > There is hope! We have an analysis of the exact
> > > breakage in
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 07:38:15PM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote:
> There is hope! We have an analysis of the exact
> breakage in eh under 10.6 for gcc trunk...
>
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2009-September/025908.html
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2009-September/02590
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 06:20:13PM -0700, ryandes...@macports.org wrote:
> Revision: 57743
> http://trac.macports.org/changeset/57743
> Author: ryandes...@macports.org
> Date: 2009-09-15 18:20:06 -0700 (Tue, 15 Sep 2009)
> Log Message:
> ---
> ImageMagick: update to 6.5.6-1
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 06:31:19PM +0200, Rainer M?ller wrote:
> On 2009-05-23 11:11, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
> > After seeing 2 people volunteer their services as MacPorts committers
> > recently, it occurred to me to wonder just how these sorts of ad-hoc,
> > informal "how can I help?" messa
On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 09:28:23PM +, Marcus Calhoun-Lopez wrote:
> Now that the very useful change of reversing @INC has been made r48955,
> will there be a rule of thumb for p5 dependencies already provided by perl5?
>
> Option 1: Only have the dependency if the newer version is needed.
> Op
FYI-
I just committed the changes to perl5.8 to alter @INC
and change the man page locations and extensions.
I think that perl5.10 should get the same @INC
alteration, not so sure about the man page stuff for it.
If there are no (reported) problems after a bit, I'll
change perl5.10
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 06:23:33AM -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> On Mar 27, 2009, at 06:19, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> >Wouldn't you say that no port should ever override the checksum
> >phase? If there are distfiles, their checksums must be validated,
> >and if there are no distfiles, then the ch
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 10:25:05AM -0700, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
>
> On Mar 13, 2009, at 9:41 AM, Eric Hall wrote:
>
> >On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 09:22:41AM -0700, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
[snip]
> >>Aren't we already adding macports /opt/local/share/man to
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 09:22:41AM -0700, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
> >>/usr/share/man/man3/CGI.3pm.gz is found before /opt/local/share/
> >>perl5.8/man/man3p/CGI.3pm even when MANPATH looks like this:
> >>
> >>/opt/local/share/man:/usr/share/man:/usr/X11/man:/usr/local/share/man
> >>
> >>I'm not s
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 03:21:11PM -0700, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
>
> On Mar 10, 2009, at 5:24 PM, Eric Hall wrote:
>
> >[snip]
> >
> > I've attached a set of patches to:
> >
> > http://trac.macports.org/ticket/12950#comment:14
>
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 11:29:35AM -0700, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
>
> On Mar 10, 2009, at 5:24 PM, Eric Hall wrote:
>
> >[snip]
> >
> > I've attached a set of patches to:
> >
> > http://trac.macports.org/ticket/12950#comment:14
> >
>
[snip]
I've attached a set of patches to:
http://trac.macports.org/ticket/12950#comment:14
for testing. So far so good for me.
-eric
___
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
http://list
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 07:08:56PM -0700, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
>
[snip]
>
> Thank you very much for participating in this process that matters a
> lot to me :)
Its good timing, this problem has been building up for
awhile now and I've finally got some time to spend on it (and
it b
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 08:34:54PM +, Marcus Calhoun-Lopez wrote:
> Eric Hall writes:
>
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 01:19:12AM +, Marcus Calhoun-Lopez wrote:
> > >
> > > Although I do not feel strongly about it, I would still vote for the orde
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 07:02:06PM -0700, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
>
> On Mar 9, 2009, at 5:27 PM, Marcus Calhoun-Lopez wrote:
>
> >Eric Hall writes:
> >
> >>
> >>On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 02:03:57PM -0700, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
> >>>I have
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 01:19:12AM +, Marcus Calhoun-Lopez wrote:
> Eric Hall writes:
>
> > Given that MP installs (most) modules into vendor_perl,
> > I think the order should be:
> >
> > site, vendor, then perl base/core.
> >
> > I
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 12:27:39AM +, Marcus Calhoun-Lopez wrote:
> Eric Hall writes:
>
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 02:03:57PM -0700, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
> > > I have played around with my perl5.8 port and I have what appears to
> > > me to
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 02:03:57PM -0700, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
> I have played around with my perl5.8 port and I have what appears to
> me to be a solution to the path collision/registry issue.
>
> I modified my perl5.8 Portfile like so:
>
> configure.args-append -D man1dir='/opt/local/sha
On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 02:41:50AM +, Marcus Calhoun-Lopez wrote:
> Bradley Giesbrecht writes:
>
> Thank you for the clarification.
>
> > > If I understand what is being discussed (please correct me if I'm
> > > wrong),
> > > we would
> > > * copy perl5.8 -> perl5.8-core.
> > > * creat
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 01:53:39AM +, Marcus Calhoun-Lopez wrote:
> Eric Hall writes:
[snip]
> > Overall I agree there is a problem with the way that
> > perl (at least perl5.8) and modules (p5-*) currently interact, and
> > we need a good (great? sufficient?) sol
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 08:21:10PM -0800, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
> On Mar 3, 2009, at 4:22 PM, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
>
> >Situation: I removed macports and reinstalled using the macports
> >wiki recommended methods.
> >I installed perl5.8 and only perl5.8 using all variants.
> >I looked f
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 02:15:30AM -0600, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> I can't install php5 on one of my machines. As a maintainer of php5,
> this is a bit of a problem. I also can't upgrade libxml2. The error
> is different everytime but often it's sh that crashes, and often the
> error message men
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:22:14PM -0700, Bryan Blackburn wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 05:08:09AM +0000, Eric Hall said:
[snip]
> >
> > I figured all of them, in case people want to use
> > the system installed X11. Perhaps I misunderstood something
> > in th
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 06:04:46PM -0800, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
>
> On Jan 19, 2009, at 15:58, Eric Hall wrote:
>
> >On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 11:38:02AM -0800, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
> >>This patch touches the 252 ports (listed at bottom) which depend on
> >>
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 11:38:02AM -0800, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
> This patch touches the 252 ports (listed at bottom) which depend on
> X11 with a lib: style dependency. It changes these to port:
> dependencies. If it was lib:...:XFree86 or lib:...:xorg, the new
> dependency is port:xorg
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 12:31:19PM -0800, ma...@macports.org wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I have two problems.
>
> 1) I installed the new perl 5.8.9 and now a port I used to install (one of
> my own - sympa) says it won't install because DB_File is not found. Was
> that included in perl 5.8.8?
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 02:34:01AM -0600, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> On Nov 21, 2008, at 00:09, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >+set distbaseQScintilla-gpl-${version}
> >+distfiles ${distbase}.tar.gz
> >+master_siteshttp://www.riverbankcomputing.com/static/
> >Downloads/QScinti
On Sat, Nov 01, 2008 at 10:17:02PM -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> On Nov 1, 2008, at 21:49, Eric Hall wrote:
>
> >Why do we have a perl5 port alongside the perl5.8 and perl5.10
> >ports? If its breaking things it seems to me we shouldn't have a
> >plain
>
On Sat, Nov 01, 2008 at 04:21:54PM -0700, David Evans wrote:
>
> I'm not sure what the agenda is with the new perl5 port but if the idea
> is to eventually replace port perl5.8 with it then ports that depend on
> perl5.8 shouldn't be changed to perl5 (even with a path dependency)
> until we're rea
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 01:11:19AM -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
[snip]
>
> There are those who complain when ports cannot be installed by non-
> root and then we end up adding +no_startupitem variants, like the
> apache2 port has. Comments on this?
>
I think splitting a port into 'plain
On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 01:46:17PM +0200, C. Florian Ebeling wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 12:04 PM, Ryan Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Oct 2, 2008, at 4:51 AM, Rainer M??ller wrote:
> >> Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I think the discussion was about changing the maintainer timeout,
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 01:16:29PM -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> On Aug 21, 2008, at 12:52, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >Revision: 39476
> > http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/changeset/39476
> >Author: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Date: 2008-08-21 10:52:30 -0700 (Thu, 21 Aug 2008
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 06:03:59PM -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> On Jul 19, 2008, at 15:14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >Revision: 38422
> > http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/changeset/38422
> >Author: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Date: 2008-07-19 13:14:07 -0700 (Sat, 19 Jul 2008
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 06:27:53PM -0400, Randall Wood wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 5:46 PM, Ryan Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > When closing a ticket in Trac, I can select from the following
> > resolutions:
> >
> > fixed
> > invalid
> > wontfix
> > duplicate
> > worksforme
> >
> > More
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 09:42:27PM -0700, Blair Zajac wrote:
> Eric Hall wrote:
> >On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 11:30:08PM -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> >>On Jun 18, 2008, at 10:17 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>
> >>>+
> >>>+
> >>>+
>
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 11:30:08PM -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> On Jun 18, 2008, at 10:17 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >+
> >+
> >+
> >+#
> >+##EOF
>
>
> Why do you add this to the end of your ports? You have this in
> ethereal, wireshark, afflib, aimage, libewf, metasploit2, metasploit3
Macports perl installs use the default @INC [1], which
can lead to problems if a perl module requires a newer version
of a (perl) Core module than what shipped with that version of
perl.
One example is MIME::Tools, which requires File::Temp
of 0.18 or greater (in 5.426, 5.425 requir
On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 02:02:57AM -0700, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
>
> On Apr 1, 2008, at 1:27 AM, Florian Ebeling wrote:
>
> >Maybe I'm too ignorant, but isn't also the fact that dependencies
> >are version-agnostic one major cause of build fails and probably a
> >cost-effective gain to chan
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 06:42:35AM -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> On Mar 26, 2008, at 11:28, Anders F Bj?rklund wrote:
>
> > Landon Fuller wrote:
> >
> >> On Mar 26, 2008, at 12:13 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> >>
> >>> Patchfile naming: The old guide was contradictory, and in one place,
> >>> recommend
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 06:46:31AM -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> On Mar 26, 2008, at 11:03, James Berry wrote:
>
> > I agree fully with Landon. The automated lint on submit should be
> > limited, if even allowed, to severe errors that will cause the port
> > to be unusable. We have enough of
There's now a ticket with a patch to reduce
'port lint' pedantry:
http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/ticket/14799
-eric
___
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforg
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 11:45:12AM -0700, Landon Fuller wrote:
>
> On Mar 25, 2008, at 11:40 AM, Blair Zajac wrote:
>
> > Landon Fuller wrote:
> >> On Mar 25, 2008, at 11:31 AM, Blair Zajac wrote:
> >>> Landon Fuller wrote:
> On Mar 25, 2008, at 11:25 AM, Blair Zajac wrote:
> > How long
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 03:48:56PM -0800, James Berry wrote:
> I'm writing to attempt to gauge interest in whether and how MacPorts
> should participate in Google Summer of Code (GSoC) for 2008. See
> http://code.google.com/soc/2008/
> .
>
> You might be inclined to address any of the followin
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 08:52:34AM -0800, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
> I think this really begins to stretch the notion of "maintainer". He
> wants a week, you want two weeks, some other maintainers will probably
> say they want a month, before long you have a lot of ports being held
> hostage
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 08:48:41PM -0700, Boyd Waters wrote:
>
[snip]
>
> MD5 is sufficient for verifying a successful download of a source
> tarball.
I believe there are attacks against MD5 that make it insufficient
to verify that the "right" distfile was downloaded.
>
> MD5 may n
On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 04:36:12AM +0100, Rainer M?ller wrote:
> js wrote:
> > As you know, MD5 has serious flaws (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MD5)
> > So recently I don't use it and even remove it when I found it in the
> > checksum part of portfile.
> > I thought dropping use of md5 in portfile
On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 04:17:53PM -0800, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I was just looking at the ghc port a few days ago, mostly in an
> attempt to figure out why it a-splode! on my 10.5 PPC system, and I
> noticed a lot of this:
>
> platform darwin 7 powerpc { ... }
> platform dar
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 02:58:35AM -0600, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> On Jan 17, 2008, at 02:46, Anders F Bj?rklund wrote:
>
> >Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> >
> >>>Also, it would be more "universal" if it was to use the 10.4u SDK
> >>>on Leopard too, since then the generated binaries would work on
> >>>
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 04:15:22PM -0600, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> On Jan 8, 2008, at 15:51, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >Modified: trunk/dports/print/libpaper/Portfile
> >===
> >--- trunk/dports/print/libpaper/Portfile 2008-01-08 2
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 05:28:00PM -0600, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> On Dec 12, 2007, at 12:30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >Revision: 31958
> > http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/changeset/31958
> >Author: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Date: 2007-12-12 10:30:58 -0800 (Wed, 12 Dec 2
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 12:48:09AM -0600, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> On Dec 7, 2007, at 23:41, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >Revision: 31806
> > http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/changeset/31806
> >Author: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Date: 2007-12-07 21:41:46 -0800 (Fri, 07 Dec 2007)
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 03:35:54PM -0600, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> Some comments...
>
> On Dec 7, 2007, at 13:12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >Added: trunk/dports/security/afflib/Portfile
> >===
> >--- trunk/dports/security/afflib/Port
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 07:06:18PM +, Eric Hall wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 04:22:12AM -0500, Randall Wood wrote:
> > The assumption that a user wants the entire X11 stack installed for
> > him is not deterministically true. I will not and can not force a
> > u
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 04:22:12AM -0500, Randall Wood wrote:
> The assumption that a user wants the entire X11 stack installed for
> him is not deterministically true. I will not and can not force a
> user to install X11 if they do not want to.
>
I agree, we can't (always) know that
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 04:54:40PM -0500, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
> On Nov 29, 2007, at 3:09 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> >>This is breaking installs of wireshark (and I expect
> >>other ports that depend on gtk2) where the user doesn't have gtk2
> >>installed already. Unless a mechanism to define
On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 07:16:49AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Revision: 31434
> http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/changeset/31434
> Author: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: 2007-11-23 07:16:47 -0800 (Fri, 23 Nov 2007)
>
> Log Message:
> ---
> @#$% default variant
On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 06:12:28PM -0500, Jon Passki wrote:
> Hey All,
>
> This patch will allow wireshark to decode SSL and TLS packets [1].
> Tested with clean --all wireshark, configure, and install. Tested
> against test SSL data [2], decoded HTTP session.
>
Committed as a variant (
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 02:24:41PM -0400, Juan Manuel Palacios wrote:
>
> Up until now we've uploaded tarballs and other distfiles to our
> distfiles section in svn to user named directories, together with a /
> distfiles/general dir for unmaintained ports. It's been discussed
> that us
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 09:31:25AM -0400, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
> On Jun 21, 2007, at 5:35 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> >Is MacPorts officially no longer supporting Jaguar?
>
> Our policy (from quite a while ago) is to support the current Mac OS
> X major release, and the one previous to it (so cur
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 02:37:27AM -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> On May 30, 2007, at 02:05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
> >+checksums md5 90298105cd17a5c2a4059297e09f1546
> >+platforms darwin
> >+
> >+## # Depends on these Perl modules
> >+## depends_lib-append
On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 01:52:22PM -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> I think it would be cool to track some statistics about how people
> are using MacPorts.
>
> We should track how many users have each port installed, so that we
> can determine what the "most popular" ports are. Not just how many
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 12:54:33PM -0700, Blair Zajac wrote:
> The scala tarball doesn't extract into a new subdirectory and instead
> just extracts into the directory where you run tar, i.e. a tarbomb. So
> in work/, you see a bin/ and a share/ directory.
>
> Is there an easy, clean way to dea
On Sat, Mar 31, 2007 at 12:40:42PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> FYI, there are only 8 ports left that depend upon DarwinPortsStartup.
>
> net/net-snmp
Make it 7, I just removed DarwinPortsStartup from net/net-snmp.
Its replacement is fake/dummy items, but the dependency is gone. Fee
On Sat, Mar 31, 2007 at 11:20:56AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org on Saturday, March 31, 2007 at 10:25 AM
> -0800 wrote:
> >Revision
> >[ http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/changeset/23415 ]23415
> >Author
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Date
> >2007-03-31 10:
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 10:55:12PM +0530, Anant Narayanan wrote:
> >> What kind of projects do you have in mind for the Summer of Code people
> >> to take on?
> >
> > The project I personally was planning on doing was an official GUI for
> > MacPorts. Currently, there's only a non-free (in all sen
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 09:23:40PM -0800, Landon Fuller wrote:
>
> On Jan 16, 2007, at 10:01 AM, Kevin Ballard wrote:
>
> >Possibly. I'd at least like to add a pre-deactivate hook that can
> >query kextstat to see if the extension is loaded, and pop up a huge
> >honking warning telling the us
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 01:42:47PM +, Charlie Allom wrote:
> either this or the .94 bump broke my wireshark configure.
>
> configure:21540: result: no
> configure:21573: gcc -o conftest -no-cpp-precomp -D_U_="__attribute__
> ((unused))" -Wall -Wpointer-arith -W -g -O2 -I/opt/local/include/
95 matches
Mail list logo
