I was able to get xorg-server to build on 10.9 with Xcode 5 by getting rid of
the usage of the following line in xquartz/pbproxy/Makefile:
-F/System/Library/Frameworks/ApplicationServices.framework/Frameworks
This line prevents it from building otherwise. clang refuses to find
CoreGraphics fra
FYI.
To get clang-3.4 to build on 10.9, I had to modify the port file to set the
isysroot to the 10.9 SDK. the build fails because it can’t find system
framework headers. add the following flag to the configure script invocation:
--with-default-sysroot=/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer
that would be great if you or someone else is going to look it. the bit of
documentation I posted last year should be in the list archives.
I'm of course available to answer questions on the work…though my memory is
going to be rusty at this point. I'll dig out the code and provide the answers
On Jan 30, 2012, at 3:23 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> Of course, that goes for anyone: as you said developer time is expensive,
> but if your company felt MacPorts was important and wanted to pay you to work
> with us to improve it, they could do that.
I did. I think macports is a beautiful solu
p file. But I've moved on. Again I make the statement…. I didn't come here to complain that my work wasn't accepted. It was merely answering Daniel's point that I should make effort to update the system. I did make that effort.iOS cross compiling support by James Gregurich Jan
ponding to Daniel telling me that if I want something changed, I should go
change it myself. I made the effort to change it.
On Jan 30, 2012, at 3:02 PM, Joshua Root wrote:
> On 2012-1-31 09:30 , James Gregurich wrote:
>> I gave you guys a complete working prototype that ha
There is no technical reason that such use has to be "unusual."
If you all you want to support are unix nerds playing with the latest build of
Gnome, that's perfectly fine. I think such a limited audience is a total waste
of the technology that has been developed as it is capable of being a gen
acports.
On Jan 30, 2012, at 1:59 PM, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
> On Jan 30, 2012, at 4:47 PM, James Gregurich wrote:
>> What's the point to this comment?
>
> perhaps you're using the wrong tool...
>
> MacPorts is (according to the website):
>
> "an open-s
What's the point to this comment?
On Jan 30, 2012, at 11:47 AM, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
> On Jan 30, 2012, at 2:16 PM, James Gregurich wrote:
>> then people must not be using macports for commercial development because
>> there is no way commercial developers can d
I've
made the problems known to you guys. handle them as you wish. I'm resigned to
eventually going back to manually building my libs as I don't see this project
as having a significant future.
On Jan 28, 2012, at 3:43 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> On Jan 27, 2012, at 19:38
I have macosx_deployment_target set to 10.6. The boost port file does not add
in the sdkroot as it should. TO fix, modify the last line in the post-configure
function to add in the isysroot entry...
fixed line:
write_jam "using darwin : : ${filter}${configure.cxx} -isysroot
${configure.sdkro
x27;t encountered the other issue, likely because I haven't been building
> any macports app that use the sdk.
>
> I'll see if I can take a look at the other issue (sdkroot) as well. Is there
> a particular port you saw this issue with?
>
> James
>
> On Jan 27, 201
I'm not sure if this is known or not, but Xcode 4.3 breaks macports. I'll
report what I have learned in hacking my macports install into working. Note
that /Developer has been moved inside the Xcode.app package and the internal
structure of Developer has changed.
In xcode 4.3, "/Applications/X
Its been some time since I submitted my experimental work for iOS support in
mac ports. I haven't gotten any feedback yet. Is this work still in the queue
to be looked at? What's the status?
-James
___
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.mac
e extra trouble to strip out the
binaries. I was in a hurry, and didn't want to take the time. The download only
takes 5 or 10 minutes on a decent connection. This should be good enough.
https://files.me.com/bayoubengal/9i3y2z
-James
On Feb 16, 2011, at 7:33 PM, James Gregurich wro
I have added additional functionality to macports. The following ports now
build: icu, zlib, bzip2, expat and boost. These ports build universal and
non-universal for MacOSX (ppc, ppc64, i386, x86_64) and iPhoneOS (armv6, armv7)
as well as non-universal for the iPhoneSimulator (only i386 exist
It works with boost 1.45. I ran it today on an 8-core mac pro.
On Feb 15, 2011, at 8:43 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> On Feb 15, 2011, at 21:05, James Gregurich wrote:
>
>> Why does the boost portfile turn off use_parallel_build?
>
> $ svn blame $(port file boost) |
Why does the boost portfile turn off use_parallel_build?
bjam does support the -j option:
http://www.boost.org/doc/tools/build/doc/html/jam/usage.html
___
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailma
only ones who
would find this functionality useful.
-James
On Feb 8, 2011, at 3:04 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> On Feb 8, 2011, at 16:55, James Gregurich wrote:
>
>> Correct me if my understanding is wrong, but my analysis is that if I
>> overrode configure in port using
On Feb 8, 2011, at 3:12 PM, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
> I also note that pre-configure and post-configure are only called once...not
> once-per-arch.
>
> I wonder if maybe it would be easier/better to modify muniversal to call them
> once per arch?
I don't think I want to do that because that mig
the pattern for myself.
On Feb 8, 2011, at 2:49 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> On Feb 8, 2011, at 16:38, James Gregurich wrote:
>
>> muniversal overrides configure. In that function, there is a loop over
>> universal_archs_to_use. I want the portfile to be able intercept each
&
On Feb 8, 2011, at 2:45 PM, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
> On Feb 8, 2011, at 5:38 PM, James Gregurich wrote:
>>
>> muniversal overrides configure. In that function, there is a loop over
>> universal_archs_to_use. I want the portfile to be able intercept each
>> iterati
zlib is working with minor modifications to the portfile. I'm now attempting
boost. That monster should be a good test.
-James
___
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-d
oshua Root wrote:
> On 2011-2-4 14:07 , James Gregurich wrote:
>> ok. I will continue running tests on what I have to see what works and what
>> doesn't work. I have the thing working for 3 different ports with no
>> unreasonable modifications to the port files. There i
re at a time...which is exactly what is needed for the configure
scripts to work right on cross-compiling.
On Feb 3, 2011, at 6:50 PM, Toby Peterson wrote:
> On Feb 3, 2011, at 6:29 PM, James Gregurich wrote:
>
>> I've been attempting to explain that I think that doing uni
problems and going through the code. So, feel free to tell me I'm
full of it.
Also, the whole purpose of my investing weeks of engineering time into this
project is to make iOS cross compiling a supported configuration.
-James
On Feb 3, 2011, at 5:19 PM, Toby Peterson wrote:
> O
rsal adds a lot of
> complexity and fragility.
>
> On 2011-2-4 12:55 , James Gregurich wrote:
>>
>> yep. armv6 armv7
>>
>> On Feb 3, 2011, at 5:10 PM, Joshua Root wrote:
>>
>>> On 2011-2-4 06:54 , James Gregurich wrote:
>>>> I think tha
yep. armv6 armv7
On Feb 3, 2011, at 5:10 PM, Joshua Root wrote:
> On 2011-2-4 06:54 , James Gregurich wrote:
>> I think that I'll change the expat port to use muniversal.
>>
>>
>>
>> Is this reasonable?
>
> What does muniversal have to do w
, James Gregurich wrote:
>
> CC
> Program for compiling C programs; default ‘cc’.
> CXX
> Program for compiling C++ programs; default ‘g++’.
> CPP
> Program for running the C preprocessor, with results to standard output;
> default ‘$(CC) -E’.
>
>
>
>
>
Where else would you put them?
On Feb 3, 2011, at 11:39 AM, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
> On Feb 3, 2011, at 2:35 PM, James Gregurich wrote:
>>
>> ok. ignoring the practical perspective, what is conceptually correct? What
>> is the design purpose of CPPFLAGS and CXXFLAGS In
ort to use muniversal.
Is this reasonable?
On Feb 3, 2011, at 11:41 AM, James Gregurich wrote:
> I found the following:
>
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/495598/difference-between-cppflags-and-cxxflags-in-gnu-make
> http://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Implicit-V
I found the following:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/495598/difference-between-cppflags-and-cxxflags-in-gnu-make
http://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Implicit-Variables.html#Implicit-Variables
On Feb 3, 2011, at 11:35 AM, James Gregurich wrote:
>
> ok. ignori
ok. ignoring the practical perspective, what is conceptually correct? What is
the design purpose of CPPFLAGS and CXXFLAGS In the configure script system?
On Feb 3, 2011, at 11:24 AM, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
> On Feb 3, 2011, at 2:14 PM, James Gregurich wrote:
>>
>> I need cl
-compiling is for an apple platform.
On Feb 3, 2011, at 11:17 AM, James Berry wrote:
>
> On Feb 3, 2011, at 11:05 AM, Toby Peterson wrote:
>
>> On Feb 2, 2011, at 5:49 PM, James Gregurich wrote:
>>
>>> I"m not sure what to do about this one. The expat port d
tails I'm not seeing and the port should work as is.
NOTE: I'm guessing that the port works for ppc/intel because CPPFLAGS doesn't
contain the -arch entries.
comments?
On Feb 2, 2011, at 11:44 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> On Feb 2, 2011, at 19:49, James Gregurich wrote:
>
&
I"m not sure what to do about this one. The expat port does not use muniversal
to do a universal build. The configure script fails when it attempts to invoke
the preprocessor. Is the correct answer to switch the port to muniversal or is
there another flaw for which I should be looking? I suppo
by "build system" do you mean expat's configure scripts or do you mean macports?
On Feb 2, 2011, at 5:21 PM, Joshua Root wrote:
> On 2011-2-3 10:46 , James Gregurich wrote:
>> Here's the bigger story:
>>
>>
>>
>> Note the expat configure l
When does muniversal get invoked? I'm running a port install on expat with
+universal, but muniversal doesn't seem to be invoked.
I put a syntax error just under "variant universal {" and just under "configure
{" to see if execution of those functions is attempted, but they aren't.
-James
___
A follow up: the changes I made add in a cpp_archflags and a "cpp" tool.
On Feb 2, 2011, at 3:46 PM, James Gregurich wrote:
> Here's the bigger story:
>
>
___
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
htt
HAVE_STRINGS_H 1
| #define HAVE_INTTYPES_H 1
| #define HAVE_STDINT_H 1
| #define HAVE_UNISTD_H 1
| #define HAVE_DLFCN_H 1
| #ifdef __cplusplus
| extern "C" void exit (int);
| #endif
| /* end confdefs.h. */
| #ifdef __STDC__
| # include
| #else
| # include
| #endif
On Feb 2, 2011, at 3:24
great. thanks. just wanted to know what the plan was.
On Feb 2, 2011, at 3:14 PM, Joshua Root wrote:
> On 2011-2-3 09:24 , James Gregurich wrote:
>>
>> Its been a couple of days and I haven't gotten any feedback on the work I've
>> supplied. Is someone lookin
A follow-up: This questions has to do with the loop in the else-block. the
if-block does modify CPPFLAGS.
On Feb 2, 2011, at 2:54 PM, James Gregurich wrote:
>
>
>
> # add extra flags that are conditional on whether we're building
> universal
>
a couple of questions:
Why doesn't CPPFLAGS contain ${output} like the other c-language flags?
append_list_to_environment_value configure "CFLAGS"
${output}${configure.cflags}
append_list_to_environment_value configure "CPPFLAGS"
${configure.cppflags}
append_list_to_en
Its been a couple of days and I haven't gotten any feedback on the work I've
supplied. Is someone looking at it?
-James
___
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
I'm ready to submit an initial draft of my icu cross-compilation work for
review. I've prepared a zip file of my "iopt" directory and placed it online.
Other should be able to unpack the file to /iopt and immediately use it by
invoking:
sudo /iopt/bin/port -v install icu +universal
URL:
For a non-universal build, what function invokes configure_main? I've tracked
it back to the following but, I'm unable to track it back any further due to my
limited knowledge of TCL.
set org.macports.configure [target_new org.macports.configure
portconfigure::configure_main]
___
I figured out what the system is doing.
___
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
t; Hello James,
>
> On 2011-02-01 00:08 , James Gregurich wrote:
>> I'm looking for documentation or an example on how to add custom code
>> to a clean operation in a portfile and I'm not finding anything
>> useful. Can I get some guidance on the proper way to exte
I'm looking for documentation or an example on how to add custom code to a
clean operation in a portfile and I'm not finding anything useful. Can I get
some guidance on the proper way to extend a 'clean' in a port file?
-James
___
macports-dev mai
ing in the bowels I suppose. Once I get that fixed, I
can submit this work for reviewunless some other bug pops up.
-James
On Jan 28, 2011, at 6:06 PM, Joshua Root wrote:
> On 2011-1-29 11:52 , James Gregurich wrote:
>>
>>> Looking back through the thread, I don'
On Jan 28, 2011, at 4:38 PM, Joshua Root wrote:
> On 2011-1-29 10:49 , James Gregurich wrote:
>>>> for the record, the precise definition of my terms are
>>>>
>>>> host = system with dev tools that builds the product
>>>> target =
hmidt wrote:
>
> On Jan 28, 2011, at 17:08, James Gregurich wrote:
>
>> That would certainly work for MacOSX. What if the host isn't an apple OS?
>> There is certainly support for freebsd in darwin ports. I would assume it is
>> meant to be generic.
>
> Dar
52 matches
Mail list logo
