Re: [71338] trunk/dports/graphics/vtk5/Portfile

2010-09-09 Thread Raphael Straub
Daniel J. Luke wrote: > On Sep 9, 2010, at 12:21 PM, Raphael Straub wrote: >> >> I didn't know that for sure. So, before committing my changes, I tested the >> new qt4_mac variant with a post-destroot block inside the variant, but the >> post-destroot phase was not executed. Everything was OK af

Re: [71338] trunk/dports/graphics/vtk5/Portfile

2010-09-09 Thread Daniel J. Luke
On Sep 9, 2010, at 12:21 PM, Raphael Straub wrote: > > I didn't know that for sure. So, before committing my changes, I tested the > new qt4_mac variant with a post-destroot block inside the variant, but the > post-destroot phase was not executed. Everything was OK after collecting all > post-d

Re: [71338] trunk/dports/graphics/vtk5/Portfile

2010-09-09 Thread Raphael Straub
Rainer Müller wrote: > On 2010-09-09 17:30 , raph...@macports.org wrote: >> Revision: 71338 >> http://trac.macports.org/changeset/71338 >> Author: raph...@macports.org >> Date: 2010-09-09 08:30:18 -0700 (Thu, 09 Sep 2010) >> Log Message: >> --- >> vtk5: >> >> * collect post-

Re: [71338] trunk/dports/graphics/vtk5/Portfile

2010-09-09 Thread Rainer Müller
On 2010-09-09 17:30 , raph...@macports.org wrote: > Revision: 71338 > http://trac.macports.org/changeset/71338 > Author: raph...@macports.org > Date: 2010-09-09 08:30:18 -0700 (Thu, 09 Sep 2010) > Log Message: > --- > vtk5: > > * collect post-destroot phases of all variants