’t intend to meddle
with things at qt3 level here.
> I would still urge caution when
> removing/obsoleting the rest though, just in case. While kde3 may be
> old and in some cases broken, one advantage that it does have is a
> smaller installation footprint and does not take as long t
On 6/5/14, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Eric Gallager wrote:
>> Of those ports you mention, I currently only have kchmviewer installed
>> on my current machine, which I installed while testing different
>> chm-viewing applications. I generally use the Chmox port for thos
in case. While kde3 may be
old and in some cases broken, one advantage that it does have is a
smaller installation footprint and does not take as long to compile. I
have been leaving qt3 installed on my current machine for this reason
for a while, so that its conflict with qt4-mac will prevent my
Hi Nicolas,
I haven’t done anything for KDE3 for a long time and if so it was just cleaning
up stg which didn’t work anymore wrt kmymoney...
So, I think it is fine to start disentangling KDE4 and KDE3 and getting rid of
the latter bit by bit now.
Greets,
Marko
We can always revert your deletions, so I’d just go for it.
If there are any issues, it should start with a discussion of relevancy. As you
point out KDE3 is beyond hope in many measures, but if there’s some very good
reason that’s hidden then source control will show its magic.
On Jun 4, 2014
Hello,
This topic has been discussed some time ago on this mailing list without a real
conclusion, but I am again considering the status of KDE3 on Macports.
Considering that Qt5 is out and KDEF5 is soon to be released, it makes KDE3
more and more obsolete. Furthermore, it seems to not build
