On Sep 17, 2012, at 9:22 AM, Joshua Root wrote:
> On 2012-9-18 01:56 , Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
>> Is "supported_archs noarch" and "+universal" mutually exclusive?
>
> Yes, or at least it makes no sense to define a universal variant for a
> noarch port.
>
>> Should the automatic "+universal" v
On 2012-9-18 01:56 , Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
> Is "supported_archs noarch" and "+universal" mutually exclusive?
Yes, or at least it makes no sense to define a universal variant for a
noarch port.
> Should the automatic "+universal" variant be excluded by "supported_archs
> noarch"?
Yes, it is
Is "supported_archs noarch" and "+universal" mutually exclusive?
Should the automatic "+universal" variant be excluded by "supported_archs
noarch"?
Regards,
Bradley Giesbrecht (pixilla)
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
macp