On 2010-10-14 19:40 , Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
I was interested in a simple and quick way to see if a port has any
tickets in trac. I wrote a simple shell script as a starting point.
Maybe there is already a command line svn-trac integration tool? I
think this might be a nice feature to
On 2010-10-16 14:50 , Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Oct 16, 2010, at 04:53, mfe...@macports.org wrote:
Revision: 72457
http://trac.macports.org/changeset/72457
Author: mfe...@macports.org
Date: 2010-10-16 02:52:57 -0700 (Sat, 16 Oct 2010)
Log Message:
---
move llvm-config
On 2010-10-16 19:10 , Mike Alexander wrote:
There's another problem with this. Since this executes
${prefix}/bin/llvm-config every time the port file is parsed it fails
if whatever provides that (maybe llvm?) is not installed. This means
that portindex fails with this patch if you don't
On 2010-10-19 22:51 , Anders F Björklund wrote:
Ryan Schmidt wrote:
And you still want to use both sha1/rmd160 rather
than just sha256, right ? (In addition to the md5.)
As I update ports I have been using sha1 and rmd160 only. I've been
removing md5 on the theory that it is obsolete and
On 2010-10-24 15:55 , MacPorts wrote:
Changed page mk by m...@macports.org from 93.233.120.127*
Page URL: https://trac.macports.org/wiki/mk
Diff URL: https://trac.macports.org/wiki/mk?action=diffversion=25
Revision 25
Comment: Hmm, tilde not allowed in URLs, disable them for now
Use =~
On 2010-10-23 11:56 , Marko Käning wrote:
I just noticed that it is possible for any registered user to create own wiki
pages on MacPorts' trac.
I found it strange though that it was not possible to delete a previously
created page anymore.
This, I understood, is only allowed to
Hello Anders,
On 2010-10-25 10:31 , Anders F Björklund wrote:
I think the main objection to sha256 checksums was
that they were too long, even though one sha256
is shorter than two as in both of sha1 and rmd160...
But one way to make it shorter is to use base32
rather than base16 for
On 2010-10-25 20:36 , Jeremy Lavergne wrote:
Is Google able to search our man pages (are they online)?
No, they are not. More than a year ago I started the new-help-system
branch, which is intended to rewrite our man pages in asciidoc. This
would make it possible to generate HTML pages as well
On 2010-10-26 19:52 , Jeremy Lavergne wrote:
Have there been any plans to make use of a `curl -# ...` style
progress bar for the download/configure/install phases? This is for
the normal, non-verbose/non-debug output.
If I remember correctly such a style is not available from libcurl, but
On 2010-10-27 03:58 , Dan Ports wrote:
Can move xmlto's dblatex/texlive dependencies into a variant, or better
yet a separate port?
As these are runtime dependencies, I assume we could remove them from
xmlto and add them on individual ports who need that as build dependencies.
Of course that
On 2010-10-29 20:32 , Marko Käning wrote:
On Oct 29, 2010, at 8:21 PM, Jeremy Lavergne wrote:
${prefix}/var/macports/sources/rsync.macports.org/release/ports/_resources/port1.0/group/
Would be an idea to update the Guide accordingly. :)
The source files for the guide are at
On 2010-10-29 20:43 , Jeremy Lavergne wrote:
I suspect it's deeper, like the locking mechanism in MacPorts: you can do
multiple non-install commands, but the moment you use an install command all
others get locked out--even while it's doing fetch for its dependencies.
Note that this behavior
On 2010-10-30 20:13 , Marko Käning wrote:
I figure there should be an XSLT stylesheet somewhere and a certain
xlstproc call to make this task work… But before I start searching
and experimenting I hope that someone can give me quick help on the
list.
There is a Makefile for this task at the
On 2010-11-02 01:13 , Ryan Schmidt wrote:
But I'm not sure it's the best strategy to try to keep that list
updated with new people. I don't know whom to properly consider
authors of MacPorts. Can we just delete that section, or refer
people to the MacPortsDevelopers wiki page?
This section
On 2010-11-08 08:59 , Anders F Björklund wrote:
Galen Wright-Watson wrote:
I've a few customizations for the `port` command, and I'm getting tired of
patching with each new release, so I'm offering them up for inclusion into
the base, should others be interested. The attached port.patch
On 2010-11-08 15:26 , Jeremy Lavergne wrote:
When you want to see which ports you _could_ remove, that aren't
depended on by anything else.
There are times when you may have installed a port as a trial and no
longer need it to be installed.
In this case, it may simply be better to include an
On 2010-11-11 02:32 , Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
After build I need to:
cd ${worksrcpat}/driver
/usr/bin/gcc blah blah
I'm currently doing:
post-build {
system cd ${worksrcpath}/driver
system CC=/usr/bin/gcc \$CC -bundle
}
You should be using ${configure.cc} and also
On 2010-11-13 15:39 , Jeremy Lavergne wrote:
Do we still need the how to build 64-bit binaries? how to?
This was just an idea, *shrug*
I added some topics as we introduced this section to encourage others to
write more HOWTO documents. But seems like that didn't work out that
way... ;-)
Rainer
On 2010-11-29 02:49 , Jeremy Lavergne wrote:
Perhaps this leads us to another issue: why is the MacPorts site a mountain
of text? Even our downloads must be found mid-sentence.
Most of the website content was written by jmpp and he loves text ;-)
I totally agree with you that the download
On 2010-12-03 13:34 , Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Dec 2, 2010, at 23:01, Jeremy Lavergne wrote:
I have a package that is on the path of being noarch, but `file` claims that
the produced .mo files are a specific endian. Are .mo files
architecture-specific?
.mo files are machine-specific
On 2010-12-11 17:22 , Francois Claire wrote:
The new ports in tickets #26325 and #27283 should be ready now.
I committed both new ports.
Sorry that it always takes that long to process your port submissions...
Rainer
___
macports-dev mailing list
I don't have a good explanation, but there are some aspects in
virtualization which are serious issues for taking benchmarks inside the VM.
Some operations may take longer or even shorter on a VM than on real
hardware. As an example, in a VM the I/O operations can happen directly
in RAM as the
On 2010-12-30 18:41 , Jeremy Lavergne wrote:
x11/gobby: Add missing dependency, fixes #27811x11/gobby: Add missing
dependency, fixes #27811x11/gobby: Add missing dependency, fixes
#27811x11/gobby: Add missing dependency, fixes #27811x11/gobby: Add missing
dependency, fixes #27811x11/gobby:
On 2011-01-02 02:11 , Ryan Schmidt wrote:
This is the layout my existing local mirror already uses, and I don't
really want to have all ports' distfiles in a single directory. Is
there any way, using MASTER_SITE_LOCAL, that I can run a local mirror
using the same directory layout as our public
On 2011-01-05 03:06 , Ryan Schmidt wrote:
The problem here was I think that you were using a
BitBucket-generated distfile, and they did not keep the distfile
around anywhere; they re-generated it later, after you had already
recorded its checksums into the portfile. I recall there was at least
On 2011-01-07 04:39 , Jeremy Lavergne wrote:
I thought we decided before that we don't want individual
maintainers distributing archives, but that we want a central
server farm creating and distributing them?
I concur with Ryan, having a central build infrastructure will be
better. MPAB is
On 2011-01-13 21:28 , Jeremy Lavergne wrote:
If you're going to do that, then you need to bump the revision too, to force
a rebuild for everyone who already installed kdelibs4 without kerberos5
support.
I'd rather avoid that, rebuilding kdelibs to change functionality would have
similar
On 2011-01-16 12:10 , Ryan Schmidt wrote:
Perhaps we could change the port -d checksum output to no longer suggest
the md5
checksums.
That's already the case for an empty or missing checksums line. It will
only print out sha1 and rmd160.
But if a checksums line already exists, checksum will
Hello,
there will be a scheduled downtime for the MacPorts Trac and the
Subversion repository due to a hardware upgrade at our hosting provider
MacOSforge.
The services will be affected on January 19th from 15:00 to 16:00 UTC.
See the original MacOSforge announcement attached below.
Rainer
On 2011-01-21 15:02 , Jack Howarth wrote:
When I did a 'sudo port selfupdate' and 'sudo port outdated, the libpng
and other packages
were updated but the pymol wasn't. I am still unclear on how this mechanism
can be certain to
sequence properly. Since MacPorts lacks the ability to
On 2011-01-21 18:44 , Jeremy Lavergne wrote:
Is this available on the site somewhere, or will each person trying to make
changes be left guessing how to do it properly?
All you need to do is 'make guide' in the doc-new directory. There is
also a README.
The Makefile expects the MacPorts
On 2011-01-21 21:41 , Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
Why are the effects of -R not the default behavior?
-R causes a forced rebuild of *all* dependents recursively and will
cause lots of unnecessary builds. There is currently no way to tell if
an upgrade of a dependent is required.
Note also, a
On 2011-01-22 01:21 , Jack Howarth wrote:
Your argument doesn't make sense. According to...
http://trac.macports.org/changeset/74954
the revision 1 change was committed on Jan 9th, whereas according to...
http://trac.macports.org/changeset/75159
The bump to revision 2 was done
On 2011-01-24 17:27 , ye...@macports.org wrote:
Revision: 75406
http://trac.macports.org/changeset/75406
Author: ye...@macports.org
Date: 2011-01-24 08:27:40 -0800 (Mon, 24 Jan 2011)
Log Message:
---
import libevent2
Added Paths:
---
On 2011-02-01 00:19 , James Gregurich wrote:
does workdir == $workpath?
Uhm, yes, that is what I meant actually. Sorry for the confusion.
I should have known better as in MacPorts anything ending with *path is
an absolute path, while *dir means a relative directory name.
If so, then that is
Hello,
there will be a scheduled downtime for the MacPorts mailing list server
due to maintenante at our hosting provider MacOSforge.
The services will be affected on February 2nd from 15:00 to 16:00 UTC.
See the original MacOSforge announcement attached below.
Rainer
Original Message
Hello,
On 2011-02-15 09:03 , Panayotis Katsaloulis wrote:
I am the author of the Jubler subtitle program and a happy user of
macports. I would like to ask if you think it is acceptable to create
a port of my application. Although I have already a DMG version and
an auto-update mechanism, I
Hello,
Google has once again announced their Google Summer of Code for 2011.
They will begin to accept mentoring organizations as of February 28
until March 11. In GSoC students get money to work for an open source
project over the summer. MacPorts participated in the years from 2007 to
2010 with
Thank you for all suggestions! I will incorporate these into the ideas
page in the next days.
On 2011-02-16 10:25 , Joshua Root wrote:
* When an action will run targets on multiple ports, run them in
parallel when possible and sensible (requires tracking dependencies
between both targets and
On 2011-02-16 18:39 , Daniel J. Luke wrote:
On Feb 16, 2011, at 12:38 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
I would dislike removing vcs fetching because it is very convenient to use.
It can be used correctly -- specifying a version to fetch -- maintainers
just need to know that they need to do that.
Hi David,
you added a pre-release version of gtk3 a few weeks ago. I was looking
into updating it to the final GTK+ 3.0.0. I noticed the new port lives
in category gnome while gtk2 is in x11.
Was this intentional? In my opinion we should move both into the same
category.
Rainer
On 2011-02-18 18:32 , David Baumgold wrote:
I agree that gtk2 and gtk3 should be in the same category, but I figured
that gnome was more applicable than x11, considering that GTK is the
Gnome ToolKit. I'm in favor of moving gtk2 to the gnome category: does
anyone have any objections?
Actually
On 2011-02-23 22:05 , Andrea D'Amore wrote:
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 11:26 PM, Ryan Schmidt ryandes...@macports.org
wrote:
Of course, MP_EDITOR won't work for most users until we release a new
version of MacPorts base including that change.
Should documentation refer to a packaged
On 2011-02-16 22:52 , Nicolas Pavillon wrote:
There are ways to circumvent this issue, but can hardly be automated
on the Portfile. Typically, a solution may be to prepare a preference
file with proper path already set in, but KDE's preferences are in
~/Library/Preferences/KDE, so that
On 2011-03-01 16:45 , Dan Ports wrote:
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 04:34:22PM -0800, Dan Ports wrote:
I see this as a high-priority issue that affects many people. So if we
can get things closer to working by revbumping a bunch of ports, we
should do that ASAP. Is there any reason *not* to revbump
Hello,
I am going to submit an application on behalf of The MacPorts Project
for the Google Summer of Code (GSoC) program 2011. I think most of you
will already have heard of it. Google pays students to work on various
Open Source projects over the summer. It is also a good start for
students
On 2011-03-03 20:08 , William Siegrist wrote:
On Mar 3, 2011, at 10:57 AM, Rainer Müller wrote:
I will stand up to be the organization administrator again as I already
did this last year. But we also need a backup administrator as a
requirement from Google. Bill, would you have time to do
On 2011-03-03 23:47 , Daniel J. Luke wrote:
On Mar 3, 2011, at 5:32 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
So I don't think changing the behavior of bin:- or lib:-style
dependencies is warranted. Port authors just need to use the
correct dependency style for what they're trying to do.
My preference would
On 2011-03-07 08:35 , Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Mar 7, 2011, at 01:18, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
On Mar 6, 2011, at 11:03 PM, Marko Käning wrote:
I guess it would be good to include this in the guide. :-)
I guess it would be.
OK, when I successfully did my modifications to said port I'll
On 2011-03-08 23:52 , Joshua Root wrote:
On 2011-3-9 05:28 , Marko Käning wrote:
I get the following error quite at the end of the process:
---
.
.
.
Writing index.html for book
guide/resources/xsl/common/stripns.xsl:10: element stylesheet: error :
Reference to namespace 'exsl' not in
On 2011-03-12 23:53 , Ryan Schmidt wrote:
We should probably continue to try to keep the epoch line *above*
the version line, since it has a *higher* precedence for MacPorts
than the version or revision. Placing it below the version line
gives it the impression of having a lower precedence and
On 03/14/2011 02:47 PM, Joseph Holsten wrote:
Is anyone maintaining a port repository mirror in git somewhere?
I've noticed a few personal repos in github, but I haven't found
anyone mirroring the official SVN repo.
From http://www.macosforge.org/post/git-mirrors/
MacPorts
On 03/18/2011 09:58 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
Can you give an example of a library that would not be relocatable?
As Anders already said, anything that uses data files from
${prefix}/share or ${prefix}/etc and has these paths hardcoded for this
purpose.
Rainer
On 03/18/2011 04:40 PM, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
http://opensource.apple.com/release/developer-tools-40/
so ... do we build/ship our own set of tools?
As far as I can see this does not include any system headers which is a
showstopper.
Rainer
___
Hello,
this is just a quick announcement that MacPorts once again has been
accepted into the Google Summer of Code program. If you are not already
familiar with this: Google pays students to work on various Open Source
projects over the summer. It is also a good start for students with Open
On 03/23/2011 10:01 AM, Daniel Heberl wrote:
I noticed that Rocco Lucia updated in December the tar balls of
Darwin Ports for Snow Leopard
(http://alice.iscanet.com/~rlucia/devel/darwin_ports/files/darwin_ports-0.5.1.tar.gz).
I see that, besides recompiling libfetch and libmd, only a few
On 03/23/2011 09:10 AM, Daniel Heberl wrote:
I asked Richard Laing if he had ever considered contributing to the
MacPorts project
by providing the sources of Porticus and he replied favorably:
I have thought about it many times! I keep hoping to find some time to get
back to Porticus
On 2011-03-24 21:26 , Chris Jones wrote:
When it starts up it asks where my 'Tcl' path is... It says it is
normally, '/Library/Tcl', but this does not exist for me... I'm
running SL (10.6.7) and macports 1.9.2. What should I put here ?
There should be a symlink at this place. Both the disk
On 2011-03-24 22:32 , Chris Jones wrote:
So, short of reinstalling completely, whats the best way to fix this.
This symlink is just for convenience, so you can package require
macports in /usr/bin/tclsh. You can also use the full path as
/opt/local/share/macports/Tcl/ instead.
Rainer
Hello Per,
On 2011-03-29 21:34 , Per Österlund wrote:
My name is Per Österlund. I'd like to work on the GUI for MacPorts.
thank you for your interest in MacPorts.
[...]
I think it'd be a nice thing if MacPorts GUI reminded of the GUI for
Mac AppStore and iTunes Store. Familiarity and all
Hello Bayard,
On 2011-03-30 00:51 , Bayard Bell wrote:
I've been somewhat active on MacPorts previously and am interested in
becoming more active via GSoC 2011 in particular.
thanks for you interest in MacPorts!
My interests in macports are pretty diverse, so I'll start with some
more blue
On 2011-03-30 02:28 , Ryan Schmidt wrote:
I would find it useful to collect this info. We discussed it briefly
some years ago and rejected it due to privacy concerns. Making it an
opt-in model would resolve that concern, but make the data less
useful. I had envisioned this information being
Hello Andre,
thanks for your interest in MacPorts!
On 2011-03-29 15:52 , Andre Murbach Maidl wrote:
I'm a student and was taking a look at Google SoC proposed projects for
macports and got interested
to work in one of the below projects:
Check dependencies after destroot
Perl modules
On 2011-03-29 17:49 , Felipe Tanus wrote:
I'm currently discussing on the list a proposal for binary dependency
for GSoC program. But I wonder if is ok to apply for two ideas, both
on macports?
Yes.
I like the rev-upgrade idea. It is a new command to scan for broken
libraries and binaries.
Hello,
this is a notice to all of you who are a student accepted into or
enrolled in a college, university or masters programs:
Google Summer of Code is a yearly program offering students stipends to
write code for Open Source projects. Students can choose one of many
mentoring organizations to
On 2011-03-30 18:38 , Felipe Tanus wrote:
How would you handle build errors? Is everything lost then and it has to
examine all libraries are again? Can that data be stored and reused?
I was thinking about pointing the error, then it was on users hand. Do
you think on a better approach? Maybe
On 2011-03-30 22:08 , Felipe Tanus wrote:
I think that would be nice if after each installed port we check for
its runtime dependencies. Since this is related to rev-upgrade
command, I thought in add this to my proposal. Does it makes sense for
macports?
What exactly do you want to check? Do
On 2011-04-02 03:55 , Joshua Root wrote:
As of r77511, port images are now stored as archives (ticket #19458).
Basic operations all work for me. There's a new script run during 'make
install' that converts existing image dirs into archives. It should
theoretically work with the flat registry
On 2011-04-04 23:09 , Christoph Iserlohn wrote:
can someone from the macports team please commit or provide feedback
for #28730, #28799 and #28879 ?
Committed #28730. I added comments to the other two.
Rainer
___
macports-dev mailing list
On 2011-04-05 23:49 , Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Apr 5, 2011, at 16:46, Larry Gilbert wrote:
Or is the PortSystem version meant for some
other kind of change?
I have no idea what it's meant for or how it's meant to be used.
PortSystem is meant to be increased once we move on with incompatible
On 2011-04-06 00:59 , Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Apr 5, 2011, at 17:51, Rainer Müller wrote:
PortSystem is meant to be increased once we move on with
incompatible changes to the Portfile syntax. The version number is
currently being used to require the port 1.0 package
(base/src/port1.0).
We
On 2011-04-06 01:22 , Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Apr 5, 2011, at 18:09, Rainer Müller wrote:
New commands are not incompatible.
Sure they are. A portfile using the new commands will cause a syntax
error in old versions of MacPorts.
Okay. I meant they are backwards compatible in a way that port
Hi,
this is just a quick reminder that the deadline for Google Summer of
Code applications is approaching. Submit your proposal now!
Deadline:April 8, 19:00 UTC
For more details about what Google Summer of Code is and how students
can earn money for working on MacPorts, see here:
On 2011-04-07 22:03 , Jeff Johnson wrote:
Does MacPorts have a well-defined and documented means of attaching the new
uid's to
ports?
Can you explain that a bit more? I know what a UUID is, but how are they
being used in Mac OS X binaries or where can I read up on that?
Rainer
On 2011-04-10 21:48 , Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
On Apr 10, 2011, at 12:01 PM, Jeremy Lavergne wrote:
Now that images and archives is in trunk, instead of hardlinking
files into place it's just expanding the archive into place--or at
least that's what it looks like. I've given up on it for
On 04/11/2011 11:07 AM, Andrea D'Amore wrote:
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 9:51 PM, Jeremy Lavergne
jer...@lavergne.gotdns.org wrote:
I'm meaning just I don't use it: svn up svn merge -c -#
Can we add an option to macports.conf to manage this behavior rather
than merging back before the
On 2011-04-11 23:48 , Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
I don't know what Jeff is doing with UUIDs (probably something
unnatural ;-) ) but I can say something about how they're used in Mac
OS X. They're basically signed in to binaries using the codesign(1)
command (see -i flag) and uniquely identify
On 04/15/2011 01:00 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
If you look at the output in the above ticket, it shows that MacPorts
was aware of php5 @5.3.6 (presumably from the rsync port repository),
but still chose php5 @5.3.5 (presumably from the local directory
which came from an old ports tarball). I
On 04/15/2011 11:29 AM, Anders F Björklund wrote:
Ryan Schmidt wrote:
Since some people want to run MacPorts mirrors on Linux,
I re-added the support for using libcrypto for checksums.
Thanks! I like increased platform-independence. :)
Make no mistake, MacPorts is still highly
On 04/15/2011 02:36 PM, Anders F Björklund wrote:
The instructions to install or uninstall MacPorts are
usually regarded as almost unreadable, I have heard.
I agree, it's too complicated.
We also have different installation instructions on macports.org, the
wiki and the guide.
Rainer
On 2011-04-17 10:33 , Joshua Root wrote:
Maybe you can help me out then. :-) I can't get (lib)curl or ping to
work inside a chroot (as created by MPAB) because their DNS lookups fail:
Actually I have no idea if Mac OS X uses this file (at least it exists
on my system), but on Linux one would
On 04/17/2011 11:25 PM, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
Perhaps a better idea would be to enhance trace mode such that it
faults in stuff on demand into a run-specific staging area.
Read-only opens of the files in the system would succeed, of course,
it being only creations or rw/append opens which
On 04/19/2011 05:39 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
What I mean is, they are debugging information; we probably don't need to
install it. Here's an amusing little write-up that talks about these DWARF
with dSYM debugging files:
On 04/18/2011 04:04 PM, Jeff Johnson wrote:
On Apr 18, 2011, at 9:40 AM, Arno Hautala wrote:
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 06:12, Bayard Bell
buffer.g.overf...@googlemail.com wrote:
I've read back on the threads from March about binary packaging and
appreciate better what constraints were
On 2011-04-22 09:05 , Joshua Root wrote:
On 2011-4-22 16:46 , Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Apr 21, 2011, at 16:07, j...@macports.org wrote:
Revision: 78062
http://trac.macports.org/changeset/78062
Author: j...@macports.org
Date: 2011-04-21 14:07:51 -0700 (Thu, 21 Apr 2011)
Log
On 2011-04-22 12:50 , Titus von Boxberg wrote:
And, since quite often it is necessary to ping into this list
to get patches recognized: How do I apply for commit rights?
If this list is the right place, then please take this mail
as an application ;-)
The process is documented here:
On 2011-04-22 23:56 , Larry Gilbert wrote:
Does anyone have any comment on the change I've proposed in ticket #28393?
http://trac.macports.org/ticket/28393
I tested the patch, works fine for me. The only difference seems to be
that no XML context is being printed anymore. But having the
On 2011-04-25 16:43 , Jeff Johnson wrote:
You might want to think through what build policy SHOULD apply
if/when you attempt binary packaging. There are many reasons for
rebuilding and version bumps and metadata dependency adjustments
involved with packaging.
I guess if we want to ship
Mentor:Rainer Müller (raimue)
post-destroot verification
Student: Felipe Tanus
Mentor:Perry Lee (perry)
Derek, Clemens, Felipe, welcome to our community!
Although you have already introduced yourself on the mailing list with
your proposals, it would probably be a good idea
On 2011-04-27 00:59 , Clemens Lang wrote:
I would like to request my patches from ticket #29146 [1] against the
outdated nc6 port to be commited, since the maintainer hasn't commented
since 11 days.
Committed in r78192.
Rainer
___
macports-dev
On 2011-06-20 12:55, Joshua Root wrote:
On 2011-6-20 09:25 , Ryan Schmidt wrote:
So we're still rsyncing, but now we're rsyncing a tarball instead of
individual files? Could you discuss this change a little? (Motivation,
benefits...)
I'm pretty sure we discussed the lack of integrity checking
Hello Ryan,
I agree we should take action on this.
On 06/20/2011 07:34 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
Should we:
a) accept that we are not currently benefiting from the large list of
mirrors, and remove them
As you explained having multiple mirrors doesn't help right now as they
all redirect
On 06/21/2011 12:12 PM, Joshua Root wrote:
On 2011-6-21 16:09 , Rainer Müller wrote:
But I don't remember we ever evaluated the impact of using a tarball
instead of
individual files. I am not yet convinced this will scale in the same way
it did before.
In what way do you expect it may
Hello Felipe,
please get in touch with Clemens as he already did some otool hacking
for his rev-upgrade project. Currently he is looking into using code
from otool and discussin license options with Apple Legal.
On 2011-06-23 01:00 , Felipe Tanus wrote:
In this project, I need to develop Tcl
On 07/06/2011 02:15 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
And I'm not convinced setting it to /var/empty is a great solution.
The issue in response to which you changed it from /dev/null to
/var/empty was about a program's inability to create some sort of
directory in home for its settings. So now it's
On 2011-07-07 04:51 , Jeremy Lavergne wrote:
+master_siteshttp://www.shibboleth.net/downloads/c++-opensaml/2.4.2/
Do we have a way of querying macports' portindex for the version of opensaml?
That would automate this path construction.
Hmm, are these versions on purpose x.4.2 or is
On 07/07/2011 06:30 AM, Joshua Root wrote:
Does anyone know how to stop this from happening? It's not causing any
actual functional problems, but it does add irrelevant lines to the
commit logs, which makes them a little harder to read.
At least I found something about the problem on the
Hey,
as registry 2.0 with 'portdbformat sqlite' stores the platform a port
was built and installed on, the migration procedure [1] needs to be
rewritten for the upcoming Lion release.
'port outdated' will consider all installed ports as outdated with a
note saying (platform darwin 10 != darwin
On 2011-07-17 02:03 , Joshua Root wrote:
Well, you still run into trouble if you're coming from a different arch
because of stuff like gawk and gsed that isn't actually depended on but
will be used if present by just about every configure script out there.
Otherwise the original 'port upgrade
On 2011-07-17 01:53 , Vincent Lefevre wrote:
* not all users are on Snow Leopard.
MacPorts officially supports the latest two releases of Mac OS X. With
the release of 10.7 Lion, we will be dropping the offical support for
10.5 Leopard.
I don't know when Subversion 1.7 will be released, but I
601 - 700 of 1310 matches
Mail list logo
