Ah, the old version is 2.0.14, not 2.0.18, apologies for the typo.
K
On 2017-09-13, at 10:22 PM, Ken Cunningham wrote:
> guile moved to 2.2.2 a few months ago, and at least two ports that link
> against guile 2.0.18 broke when 2.2 rolled out:
>
> geda-gaf
On 09/05/2017 08:21 PM, Rainer Müller wrote:
> Totally in favor. I have been using gnupg21 for a while and had to keep
> local modifications for some dependencies.
>
> But let us hear how Mihai as the current maintainer of the gnupg* ports
> thinks about that.
I guess that all makes sense.
If
On Sep 13, 2017, at 08:42, Rainer Müller wrote:
> On 2017-09-13 11:48, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>> When trying to update x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc I noticed that GCC 7.2 no
>> longer provides bzip2 sources, but I'm not sure how to tell the
>> Portfile that it should use xz instead of bzip2 given that
On 2017-09-13 11:48, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> When trying to update x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc I noticed that GCC 7.2 no
> longer provides bzip2 sources, but I'm not sure how to tell the
> Portfile that it should use xz instead of bzip2 given that the
> crossgcc group already contains "use_bzip2 yes".
Hi,
When trying to update x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc I noticed that GCC 7.2 no
longer provides bzip2 sources, but I'm not sure how to tell the
Portfile that it should use xz instead of bzip2 given that the
crossgcc group already contains "use_bzip2 yes".
The alternative is of course to change all
