Re: Allowing PortGroups to bump port revision

On 2018-1-13 13:13 , Clemens Lang wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 03:30:50PM -0800, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia wrote: >> In https://trac.macports.org/ticket/54744, we've been pondering adding >> a PortGroup to allow concurrent installation of multiple providers of >> the OpenSSL API (eg: o

Redistributable binaries for 10.5 or 10.6 from C++11 sources

Hi. I would like to build and distribute some poppler-based command-line utilities (I would compile them with compiler from MacPorts, but distribute it to users with MacPorts). I could use either gcc or clang, but what are the options to make that work for 10.5/10.6? Can libc++ or libstdc++ be li

Re: GSoC 2018 Application

Hi Umesh, On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 4:21 PM, Umesh Singla wrote: > Hi, > > Following the conversation on the dev mailing list, I have assumed the role > of organization administrator and Jackson Isaac as backup administrator and > a potential mentor for now. > > I have registered MacPorts for part

Re: Allowing PortGroups to bump port revision

> On Jan 12, 2018, at 5:21 PM, René J.V. Bertin wrote: > > On Friday January 12 2018 15:30:50 Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia wrote: > >> It occurred to me that it would be nice if we could update the PortGroup >> when one of the dependencies changed their dylib id rather than revbumping >> all po

Re: Allowing PortGroups to bump port revision

On Jan 12, 2018, at 9:13 PM, Clemens Lang wrote: > Unfortunately ports are only re-indexed when their mtime changes, so > while you could just set revision (or epoch, or some other variable) in > a PortGroup, that would still not lead to those ports getting reindexed. We track this variable in po

Re: Allowing PortGroups to bump port revision

Hi, On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 03:30:50PM -0800, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia wrote: > In https://trac.macports.org/ticket/54744, we've been pondering adding > a PortGroup to allow concurrent installation of multiple providers of > the OpenSSL API (eg: openssl, libressl, libressl-devel) and allow > port

Re: Allowing PortGroups to bump port revision

On Friday January 12 2018 15:30:50 Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia wrote: > It occurred to me that it would be nice if we could update the PortGroup when > one of the dependencies changed their dylib id rather than revbumping all > ports. Is this something anyone else has considered? I don't think I

Re: Allowing PortGroups to bump port revision

On Jan 12, 2018, at 6:30 PM, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia wrote: > In https://trac.macports.org/ticket/54744, we've been pondering adding a > PortGroup to allow concurrent installation of multiple providers of the > OpenSSL API (eg: openssl, libressl, libressl-devel) and allow ports to > specify

Allowing PortGroups to bump port revision

In https://trac.macports.org/ticket/54744, we've been pondering adding a PortGroup to allow concurrent installation of multiple providers of the OpenSSL API (eg: openssl, libressl, libressl-devel) and allow ports to specify which they are compatible with. It occurred to me that it would be nice

Re: a no-homepage homepage for ports with dead homepages

On 2018-01-12, at 2:12 AM, Rainer Müller wrote: > > Nit pick: I would have called it NoHomepage (small letter p), as the > compound form seems to be more common than two words and it is used this > way as Portfile option and in the wiki page itself. Done. I always seem to want to CamelCase syll

Re: 10.13 builder on our BuildBot is failing

Ryan, > as suggested in the thread. Thanks for pointing me toward it! Glad to know it worked. Have a great day!

GSoC 2018 Application

Hi, Following the conversation on the dev mailing list, I have assumed the role of organization administrator and Jackson Isaac as backup administrator and a potential mentor for now. I have registered MacPorts for participating in GSoC this year and submitted the initial version of the applicati

Re: 10.13 builder on our BuildBot is failing

On Jan 11, 2018, at 11:11, Vincent Habchi wrote: > That being said, there was a hack listed somewhere in the messages that > consisted of booting single user and touching a driver. Did you try that? It > can’t do any harm to try and test. It was fixed with: sudo touch /System/Library/Extensio

Re: a no-homepage homepage for ports with dead homepages

On 2018-01-11 22:22, Jan Stary wrote: > On Jan 11 11:49:40, ken.cunningham.web...@gmail.com wrote: >> I've been prospecting MacPorts errors reported by repology >> . A >> common error is that the homepage 404s out. >> >> Many o

Re: 10.13 builder on our BuildBot is failing

Ryan, so what was the problem? Vincent