Re: Mirror size & completeness of binaries

On 2018-03-30 21:20, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > I have not yet heard any reason why we need to change the file structure of > the packages server. The start of the discussion was to have mirrors that only provide a subset of the packages, for example the latest release. It would be a lot easier to

Re: Mirror size & completeness of binaries

On Mar 29, 2018, at 10:50, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > On 29 March 2018 at 16:19, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > >> I do not wish to create separate small and complete mirrors. I wish to keep >> a single complete mirror at our primary rsync.macports.org server, and leave >> it up to each individual mirror

Re: Mirror size & completeness of binaries

On Mar 29, 2018, at 12:55, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > On 29 March 2018 at 18:21, Rainer Müller wrote: >> On 2018-03-29 16:19, Ryan Schmidt wrote: >>> At the same time, we need to consider how MacPorts base will respond to the >>> situation. Currently, it assumes all packages are available on all

Re: Mirror size & completeness of binaries

On Mar 30, 2018, at 12:15, Michael wrote: > On 2018-03-29, at 8:13 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > >> The mirrors don't run MacPorts; they use rsync. > > rsync cannot detect renames? I didn't think it did. I did find this article which describes a method that can be used to achieve it, however,

Re: Mirror size & completeness of binaries

On 2018-03-29, at 8:13 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > The mirrors don't run MacPorts; they use rsync. rsync cannot detect renames? --- Entertaining minecraft videos http://YouTube.com/keybounce

Re: [macports-ports] branch master updated: py-pew: new port

On Mar 30, 2018, at 09:39, Emre Şafak wrote: > Perry E. Metzger (pmetzger) pushed a commit to branch master > in repository macports-ports. > > > https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/commit/3bf328c3bc6106944190a70429291880f0584b2a > > The following commit(s) were added to

Re: Getting a list of all portfiles

On Mar 29, 2018, at 22:55, Andrew Moore wrote: > If ports are managed by git(1), ls-files seems to be the fastest method of > getting a list of Portfiles. > > $ time git -C /ports ls-files /*/Portfile >/dev/null > > real 0m0.100s > user 0m0.030s > sys 0m0.020s > $ Thanks, I didn't know

Re: Mirror size & completeness of binaries

On 2018-03-29, at 7:21 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > On Mar 28, 2018, at 07:24, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > >>> I know it is nice to see all packages for a port in one place and it is >>> easier to check what has already been built. But hopefully we would have >>> this

Re: Mirror size & completeness of binaries

On Mar 29, 2018, at 20:53, Michael wrote: > On 2018-03-29, at 7:21 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > >> On Mar 28, 2018, at 07:24, Mojca Miklavec wrote: >> I know it is nice to see all packages for a port in one place and it is easier to check what has already been built. But hopefully we