Re: Releasing 2.4.4

2018-05-05 Thread Rainer Müller
On 2018-04-29 10:17, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > Are there any news or progress about the 2.4.4 release? It has been two weeks. How do we want to proceed? Rainer

Re: Instructions for creating patches

2018-05-05 Thread Ken Cunningham
> On May 4, 2018, at 3:33 PM, Rainer Müller wrote: > > > Maybe the instructions on how to create a local ports tree should come > first and then the next section should show how to create a diff against > the official ports tree? > > Instructions on how to create a pull request would overlap

Re: Instructions for creating patches

2018-05-05 Thread G A
step 5 is misleading and technically incorrect. a clone is a clone, exact copy, there is only one repo. unless they have credentials, they will not be able to push changes back to the master/origin even if they choose not to branch and work on master it should say something like build your branch

Re: [macports-ports] branch master updated: duck: clear configure.cxx_stdlib flag

2018-05-05 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On May 5, 2018, at 16:36, Jackson Isaac wrote: > Jackson Isaac (JacksonIsaac) pushed a commit to branch master > in repository macports-ports. > > > https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/commit/efaaa894e2e0a8af5e9918d296889db9929e7103 > > The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/m

Re: [macports-ports] branch master updated: duck: clear configure.cxx_stdlib flag

2018-05-05 Thread Joshua Root
On 2018-5-6 09:55 , Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > On May 5, 2018, at 16:36, Jackson Isaac wrote: > >> +## Upstream binary seems to be built using libstdc++ >> >> +# Port keeps failing on rev-upgrade since it >> >> +# checks if duck is built against libc++ or not. >> >> +configure.cxx_stdlib > > Then

Re: [macports-ports] branch master updated: duck: clear configure.cxx_stdlib flag

2018-05-05 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On May 5, 2018, at 19:04, Joshua Root wrote: > On 2018-5-6 09:55 , Ryan Schmidt wrote: >> >> On May 5, 2018, at 16:36, Jackson Isaac wrote: >> >>> +## Upstream binary seems to be built using libstdc++ >>> >>> +# Port keeps failing on rev-upgrade since it >>> >>> +# checks if duck is built a

Compiler blacklist 'shorthand'

2018-05-05 Thread Craig Treleaven
Hi: A couple of times recently, I’ve noticed boilerplate in ports that require C++14. After including the compiler_blacklist_versions portgroup, they then do some gymnastics like: compiler.blacklist *gcc-3.* *gcc-4.* {*gcc-5.[0-3]} \ {clang < 800} macports-

Re: [macports-ports] branch master updated: duck: clear configure.cxx_stdlib flag

2018-05-05 Thread Joshua Root
On 2018-5-6 10:05 , Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > On May 5, 2018, at 19:04, Joshua Root wrote: > >> On 2018-5-6 09:55 , Ryan Schmidt wrote: >>> >>> On May 5, 2018, at 16:36, Jackson Isaac wrote: >>> +## Upstream binary seems to be built using libstdc++ +# Port keeps failing on rev-upgra

Re: Compiler blacklist 'shorthand'

2018-05-05 Thread Marcus Calhoun-Lopez
There is some code written to do something like this. The PortGroup is: https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/blob/master/_resources/port1.0/group/languages-1.0.tcl The associated ticket is: https://trac.macports.org/ticket/55139 PortGroup languages 1.0 compiler.cxx_standard 2014 I have be