Re: upgrade to openssl 3.0.0

2021-10-06 Thread Christopher Jones
I’m working on the basic changes to implement my suggestion at the moment. Once that is there testing specific ports against version 3 ’the canaries’ will be trivial. more in a bit. > On 6 Oct 2021, at 5:40 pm, Ken Cunningham > wrote: > > For whoever gets up the enthusiasm to take on the

Re: upgrade to openssl 3.0.0

2021-10-06 Thread Ken Cunningham
For whoever gets up the enthusiasm to take on the storm of nay-sayers: Although I found about 90% of the 100 or so ports I tried built without any changes against openssl 3.0.0 (rust, cargo, qt5, qt4-mac, etc, etc), and the rest were easy < 5 min fixes to use our openssl11 port, I noted in the

Re: Portfile dependencies relying on specific variant Mugvagut7

2021-10-06 Thread Frank Dean
Ryan Schmidt writes: > On Oct 5, 2021, at 05:36, Frank Dean wrote: >> >> I've submitted a pull request [1] for a new Portfile, `mod_tile`, but the >> checks are failing because this port requires the `mapnik` port to be >> installed with a non-default variant, `+postgis`. Similarly, it