Hi,
On Sat, Dec 03, 2016 at 11:35:21AM +0100, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> If I may add a few more cents to this topic (I understand things are
> still in flux):
This has been implemented in released in 2.3.5 already, so there's no
flux and we get to keep what we currently have.
I haven't gotten ar
Hi,
If I may add a few more cents to this topic (I understand things are still in
flux):
In order to keep the maintainer lines a bit cleaner: would it be possible to
consider a syntax where each maintainer has a single entry which just appends
the github ID along the lines `currentlyusedID=git
On Friday December 02 2016 21:52:00 Rainer Müller wrote:
> should review and acknowledge the merge. In any case, the maintainer
> needs to be notified, which can only be achieved with an @ mention.
OK, I guess that answers my question.
R.
On 2016-12-02 21:47, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> On Friday December 02 2016 20:54:41 Rainer Müller wrote:
>
>> Which notification mail? There are no notification mails going to the
>> maintainer for pull requests unless the person opening the pull requests
>
> We must be talking about different thi
On Friday December 02 2016 20:54:41 Rainer Müller wrote:
> Which notification mail? There are no notification mails going to the
> maintainer for pull requests unless the person opening the pull requests
We must be talking about different things.
If the maintainer opens the PR and he hasn't disab
On 2016-12-02 20:39, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> What does "@mentioning maintainers on pull requests" do, concretely?
> (If it's akin to those #sillytweetythingies, aka "hey @RJVB, could you ..." -
> that looks just as silly to me, if you read the notification emails before
> opening the webpage :
On Friday December 02 2016 10:49:17 Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> https://trac.macports.org/ticket/52928
> We need emails for reaching maintainers and sending emails from the buildbot,
> but we also want to be able to `@mention` maintainers on pull requests.
> Alternatively we could have a plain text
