On 2018-04-10 19:39, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> Do you want to merge this performance enhancement too:
[...]
> And these bugfixes:
I assigned this to the MacPorts 2.4.4 milestone, so we do not forget
about them:
https://trac.macports.org/ticket/56267
Rainer
On 2018-04-10 21:06, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> I'm not going to merge them, because I don't know how, and don't have the
> energy to attempt to learn how to do so, given the zillion other things I'm
> trying to do right now.
This is even documented:
On Apr 10, 2018, at 13:47, Rainer Müller wrote:
> On 2018-04-10 20:26, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>>
>> On Apr 10, 2018, at 12:54, Rainer Müller wrote:
>>>
>>> At some point we should make a cut and not add many changes in the last
>>> minute...
>>
>> Well I can't force you to merge them.
>
> I
On 2018-04-10, at 12:02 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> On Apr 10, 2018, at 13:55, Ken Cunningham wrote:
> Mixing libc++ and libstdc++ results in a link failure. Mixing old libstdc++
> and new libstdc++ did not previously result in a link failure; it resulted in
> a runtime crash which was
On Apr 10, 2018, at 13:55, Ken Cunningham wrote:
> On 2018-04-10, at 11:47 AM, Rainer Müller wrote:
>>>
>>> I don't want to release 2.4.3 with the libstdc++ ABI issue unanswered. I
>>> believe it will cause problems.
>>
>> Then we should revert this change for 2.4.3 and we have one more
On 2018-04-10 20:26, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> On Apr 10, 2018, at 12:54, Rainer Müller wrote:
>>
>> At some point we should make a cut and not add many changes in the last
>> minute...
>
> Well I can't force you to merge them.
I cannot stop you either... I am just afraid that by merging changes
On Apr 10, 2018, at 12:54, Rainer Müller wrote:
>
> On 2018-04-10 19:39, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>>
>> On Apr 10, 2018, at 12:07, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>>
>>> On Apr 9, 2018, at 17:15, Rainer Müller wrote:
>>>
If nobody objects, I am going to tag a new release on Tuesday and
prepare
On 2018-04-10 19:39, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> On Apr 10, 2018, at 12:07, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
>> On Apr 9, 2018, at 17:15, Rainer Müller wrote:
>>
>>> If nobody objects, I am going to tag a new release on Tuesday and
>>> prepare tarballs.
>>
>> Please merge my other two commits from this ticket:
On Apr 10, 2018, at 12:44, Rainer Müller wrote:
> Building package installers is the most time-consuming operation in our
> release process. Therefore I was asking whether it is actually worth to
> wait for them to appear before releasing to selfupdate.
I am rebuilding our installer creation
I am not comfortable releasing a version of MacPorts that includes a MacPorts
gcc in the default compiler list (which 2.4.3 now does) without having answered
the new-vs-old ABI question satisfactorily. I believe releasing that will lead
to the libstdc++ mismatch crashes that were the reason why
On 2018-04-10 19:07, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> On Apr 9, 2018, at 17:15, Rainer Müller wrote:
>
>> If nobody objects, I am going to tag a new release on Tuesday and
>> prepare tarballs.
>
> Please merge my other two commits from this ticket:
>
> https://trac.macports.org/ticket/55492
>
> My
On Apr 10, 2018, at 12:07, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> On Apr 9, 2018, at 17:15, Rainer Müller wrote:
>
>> If nobody objects, I am going to tag a new release on Tuesday and
>> prepare tarballs.
>
> Please merge my other two commits from this ticket:
>
> https://trac.macports.org/ticket/55492
>
>
On Apr 9, 2018, at 17:15, Rainer Müller wrote:
> If nobody objects, I am going to tag a new release on Tuesday and
> prepare tarballs.
Please merge my other two commits from this ticket:
https://trac.macports.org/ticket/55492
My first commit, which you merged, was buggy and needed fixing.
>
On Apr 9, 2018, at 22:43, Eric A. Borisch wrote:
> I'd still like to see the opportunistic (via libarchive / bsdtar) compression
> (pull request #45) integrated at some point; with modern machines and their
> soldered-down storage, it's all the more useful.
Sure, but this thread is about
[Sending from the correct address this time]
I'd still like to see the opportunistic (via libarchive / bsdtar)
compression (pull request #45) integrated at some point; with modern
machines and their soldered-down storage, it's all the more useful.
Shall I open a ticket in trac as a feature
Hello,
according to our milestone on Trac, there is nothing left to be fixed or
backported to the release-2.4 branch for MacPorts 2.4.3.
The ChangeLog was already updated and reflects the changes this release
will contain:
https://github.com/macports/macports-base/blob/release-2.4/ChangeLog
See
16 matches
Mail list logo
