On Apr 30, 2008, at 10:12 PM, Jerry wrote:
Did that. Then did sudo port install octave once again, with pretty
much the same results--same pathname problem. I'm getting the teTeX
complaint again but there is no portfile for octave to edit. Also,
I have texlive_texmf-minimal installed--I don
On Apr 30, 2008, at 6:29 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Apr 30, 2008, at 7:05 PM, Jerry wrote:
The error seems to come from (1) My having a crufty Ada + other
gcc compilers installation in a directory called, probably in
part, "before Dec 12, 2007", (2) the installer for some reason
_finding_
On Apr 30, 2008, at 7:05 PM, Jerry wrote:
The error seems to come from (1) My having a crufty Ada + other gcc
compilers installation in a directory called, probably in part,
"before Dec 12, 2007", (2) the installer for some reason _finding_
it and (3) spaces in the path name going into an u
On Apr 30, 2008, at 5:05 PM, Jerry wrote:
FWIW, I started a thread on problems installing PLplot also, and
(after a clean jpeg operation that was suggested by an earlier
failure) with the (nearly?) exact same problem with the same
pathname-with-spaces at "---> Building texlive_base with ta
(OP responding to 3-4 helpful suggestions from others in this thread)
I edited the portfile as suggested to install texlive rather than
tetex. That results in this, when I re-try installing Octave:
/usr/bin/gcc-4.0 -o xdvi-xaw.bin browser.o dvi-draw.o dvi-init.o
dvisel.o encodings.o events.
On Apr 30, 2008, at 3:39 PM, Charles darwin wrote:
$ port variant foo
foo has the variants:
*
darwin_*
What does it mean to install port foo +darwin_[6-9] as opposed to
simply port foo? i.e.
$ sudo port install foo
#vs.
$sudo port install foo +darwin_*
The darwin_*, i386,
$ port variant foo
foo has the variants:
*
darwin_*
What does it mean to install port foo +darwin_[6-9] as opposed to
simply port foo? i.e.
$ sudo port install foo
#vs.
$sudo port install foo +darwin_*
Regards,
___
macports-users
On Apr 30, 2008, at 9:21 AM, Chris Janton wrote:
On 2008-04-30 , at 05:56 , Charles darwin wrote:
I just installed `coreutils' but it seems that it doesn't effect
which utils (cp, df, du, ls …) are default. i.e.
$ which cp
/bin/cp
$ which ls
/bin/ls
$ which df
/bin/df
$ which du
/usr/bin/d
On 2008-04-30 , at 05:56 , Charles darwin wrote:
I just installed `coreutils' but it seems that it doesn't effect
which utils (cp, df, du, ls …) are default. i.e.
$ which cp
/bin/cp
$ which ls
/bin/ls
$ which df
/bin/df
$ which du
/usr/bin/du
$
What is going on? What am I missing?
sudo po
Citando James Sumners :
> I recommend changing the dependency to texlive and rebuilding. teTeX
> is obsolete.
>
Unfortunately, texlive will probably fail with the same error:
http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/ticket/13396
milosh
___
macports
Charles darwin wrote:
I just installed `coreutils' but it seems that it doesn't effect
which utils (cp, df, du, ls …) are default. i.e.
$ which cp
/bin/cp
$ which ls
/bin/ls
$ which df
/bin/df
$ which du
/usr/bin/du
$
What is going on? What am I missing?
Running 'port contents coreutils' an
Try which -a
the which util only shows the first find in the PATH by default.
--Mike H
On Apr 30, 2008, at 8:56 AM, Charles darwin wrote:
I just installed `coreutils' but it seems that it doesn't effect
which utils (cp, df, du, ls …) are default. i.e.
$ which cp
/bin/cp
$ which ls
/bin/ls
James Sumners wrote:
I recommend changing the dependency to texlive and rebuilding. teTeX
is obsolete.
Jerry: you don't actually have to edit anything, just install texlive.
Octave's TeX dependency will then be satisfied and installing Octave
won't first try to install teTeX.
- Josh
___
I just installed `coreutils' but it seems that it doesn't effect
which utils (cp, df, du, ls …) are default. i.e.
$ which cp
/bin/cp
$ which ls
/bin/ls
$ which df
/bin/df
$ which du
/usr/bin/du
$
What is going on? What am I missing?
Regards,___
macp
On Apr 29, 2008, at 6:34 PM, Morgan Sutherland wrote:
That didn't work; same error.
Ok, then I'm not sure what to do next, sorry. I don't know much about
the gtk ports. All I know is gtk-doc installed successfully on my
system just a few weeks ago.
I'm pretty sure that it's more than gt
15 matches
Mail list logo
