Hi,
I would say, if I had a vote (who does?), that whatever people are willing
to use wins. It may not be elegant or state of the art, but the best is the
enemy of the good, and good is usually good enough.
I like to point out one more aspect: *If* we are going for a new Wiki
we might as
On Jun 10, 2008, at 23:28, Tabitha McNerney wrote:
I have been working on a script (written in Ruby) that takes the
output of the port command-line program (as suggested by Rainer
recently), and parses the output looking for either port
dependencies or file dependencies (note: up until
Zitat von Jordan K. Hubbard [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Well, to be fair, I thought I was trying to address that by suggesting
that there should be a top level doc project - individual projects
could point up to it just as easily as it could point down to them,
but it would be a clear docs portal for
On Jun 11, 2008, at 01:15, Martin Krischik wrote:
I would say, if I had a vote (who does?), that whatever people are
willing
to use wins. It may not be elegant or state of the art, but the
best is the
enemy of the good, and good is usually good enough.
I like to point out one more
Zitat von Ryan Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Jun 11, 2008, at 01:15, Martin Krischik wrote:
I would say, if I had a vote (who does?), that whatever people are willing
to use wins. It may not be elegant or state of the art, but the best is the
enemy of the good, and good is usually good
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 4:18 AM, Martin Krischik
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Zitat von Ryan Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Jun 11, 2008, at 01:15, Martin Krischik wrote:
I would say, if I had a vote (who does?), that whatever people are willing
to use wins. It may not be elegant or state of the
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 8:27 PM, Ryan Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Jun 10, 2008, at 23:28, Tabitha McNerney wrote:
I have been working on a script (written in Ruby) that takes the output of
the port command-line program (as suggested by Rainer recently), and parses
the output
On Jun 11, 2008, at 05:53, Tabitha McNerney wrote:
I seem to get commas always:
$ port info --depends_lib gnome-vfs
depends_lib: port:gconf, port:dbus, port:openssl, port:libidl,
port:dbus-glib, port:libxml2, port:libiconv, port:gettext
$ port info --depends_run gnome-vfs
depends_run:
On Jun 2, 2008, at 04:28, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Jun 2, 2008, at 01:03, Nathan Brazil wrote:
Hi. I see that FreeTDS has no maintainer. The latest portfile
lists it at version 0.64, while the latest version at http://
freetds.org is 0.82.
I have updated and attached the portfile. I
Ryan Schmidt wrote:
Are you sure you're using the latest MacPorts?
1.6.0 right?
Oh, I thought for some reason this port info --depends_foo stuff
had been added more recently than 1.6.0 and that you were running the
latest version from trunk, as I am. So if the problem exists in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's not to say I don't see your point too. MacPorts port (and
AppleScript script) is long and sounds silly. Would be neat if we
could come up with a new cute term for our ports. Ruby has gems, for
instance. What entities could MacPorts have?
Hmn. How about mport
Hi,
I'm trying to install gnome-sharp2 and am getting the following error
message when I use 'sudo port install gnome-sharp2':
*configure: error: Package requirements (render = 0.9) were not met.
Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you
installed software in a
On Jun 10, 2008, at 11:23 PM, Martin Krischik wrote:
Note that MediaWiki supports up to 256 name spaces. For example on
wikibooks the cookbook runs in it's own name space:
http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cookbook
I think it would be a good idea to have one wiki for - including the
homepage. It
On Jun 10, 2008, at 11:32 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
The proposed new wiki was to be a global Mac OS Forge documentation
wiki, not a MacPorts-specific wiki. I'm still not a fan of the idea.
Do we really want to spend the time and energy converting content
from the MacPorts Trac wiki to a Mac OS
On Jun 11, 2008, at 1:18 AM, Martin Krischik wrote:
From my quick check I also noted that MacPorts clearly is the largest
Project on MacOS Forge ao we might as well take the lead.
Actually, I believe that honor goes to WebKit. :-)
It would be nice to have some pageview stats to back that up,
On Jun 11, 2008, at 10:33 AM, Rainer Müller wrote:
I dislike 'MacPort', but I like the term 'mport'.
I dunno, that just doesn't seem to roll off the tongue and also
suffers from excessive contraction at the wrong place. If, for
example, you were trying to come up with a more convenient
Failed to send to list...
-- Forwarded message --
From: Randall Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 2:55 PM
Subject: Re: New Howto
To: Jordan K. Hubbard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 2:02 PM, Jordan K. Hubbard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 10,
Hmm, is it about time for the Bike Shed link to be cited?
As a non-committer who has used MacPorts since it was DarwinPorts and used
Fink before that, here's my two shiny bits of something or other.
I wasn't aware there was large body of documentation to be migrated, so the
argument that a new
Hi all,
I'm trying to make a new Portfile (for the ruby GeoIP module).
And I've set up a local ports repository.
Inside my local port repository, I've set up a directory
with the Portfile and a files directory that contains
patch files. It looks good when I run a portindex command.
However,
Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
Mmm-port is how you'd pronounce mport in english, and I don't think
that's very phonetically pleasing.
I've always mentally pronounced it as emport, with the accent on the
first syllable, which isn't too bad.
- Josh
___
On Jun 11, 2008, at 14:53, Ralph Pass wrote:
Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Jun 10, 2008, at 11:43, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For a long time, I thought that when people were saying port, in
this discussion, I thought the were referring to a port or a tcp/
ip address. like localhost:80
Clarity
On Jun 11, 2008, at 14:52, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to make a new Portfile (for the ruby GeoIP module).
And I've set up a local ports repository.
Inside my local port repository, I've set up a directory
with the Portfile and a files directory that contains
patch files. It looks
On Jun 11, 2008, at 17:30, Joshua Root wrote:
Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
Mmm-port is how you'd pronounce mport in english, and I don't think
that's very phonetically pleasing.
I've always mentally pronounced it as emport, with the accent on the
first syllable, which isn't too bad.
That
On Jun 11, 2008, at 3:49 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
That can be our new verb. I need to emport that new software.
A noble spirit embiggens the smallest man...
OK, consider my mind changed in just 2 lines. :-)
- Jordan
___
macports-users mailing list
24 matches
Mail list logo
