Re: Installing Apache2 on Leopard

On Jan 24, 2009, at 07:48, Scott Haneda wrote: On Jan 24, 2009, at 5:16 AM, Jason Hirsh wrote: I have successfully accomplished this... but frankly the process just doesn't sit well with my sense of things.. I now have two complete Apache installations... and have to do work arounds to

Re: Universal Binaries

On Jan 24, 2009, at 14:01, Timothy Lee wrote: Exact same settings as below (except I'm only building i386), yet I'm still seeing "DEBUG: Environment: MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET='10.5'". Any Ideas? Only building i386 -- does that mean you are not using the +universal variant? If so, the

Re: apache2 fails to install

On Jan 24, 2009, at 10:19, Geert De Deckere wrote: I'm completely stuck installing apache2. No idea what exactly is going wrong. It's a clean macports install (1.700). I even ran a manual selfupdate. Installing git-core went flawless, it's just apache2 that is causing problems. Thanks for h

Re: install slib-guile hangs on activation

On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 12:15 PM, danstadler wrote: > > anyone have any luck on this? I've got the same hang, and it blocks me > from > installing gnucash. > The gnucash port depends on slib-guile16, not slib-guile, so it should still be installable. It works for me. Are you trying to compile G

ncurses failure (5.7)

I'm failing on installing ncurses (w/ +universal variant). I tried the instructions from this old post: >David, > >In answer to your question, yes. There is a bug that has already been >reported. You will have to clean ncurses and run the following commands >in this exact order: > >sudo port

Re: install slib-guile hangs on activation

anyone have any luck on this? I've got the same hang, and it blocks me from installing gnucash. I don't know much about slib or guile, or maybe I'd look into the code myself... TIA- dan Charles Day wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Bryan Blackburn wrote: > >> On Fri, Jan 16,

Re: Universal Binaries

Exact same settings as below (except I'm only building i386), yet I'm still seeing "DEBUG: Environment: MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET='10.5'". Any Ideas? Also - I'm seeing ""Warning: Please fix or indicate this misbehavior (if it is intended)"" on every install saying that /mopt/local/bin is i

Re: Boost in MacPorts Issue

and also I have in my .bash_profile this export: export CXXFLAGS="-I /opt/local/include"; Usually this should go into CPPFLAGS as it is for the preprocessor. Also, check that the Makefile or build system is honoring the environment variables. Maybe you need to pass this directly to make li

Re: Universal Binaries

It's definitely not the first. I assume they added code to support aqua and it's API's. I'm not a developer. just google for answers :) Harry 2009/1/24 Timothy Lee > Hmm.. thats interesting.So, does that imply that aqua provides a X11-like > API (w/ libs) or does that mean that the actual peopl

Re: Universal Binaries

Hmm.. thats interesting. So, does that imply that aqua provides a X11-like API (w/ libs) or does that mean that the actual people writing packages (like openoffice) need to support aqua calls conditionally compiled in on detection of the aqua include/libs? thanks On Jan 24, 2009, at 1:25

Re: Error after trying to upgrade installed

If direct mode is removed, I will use the following to work around: port destroot foo rsync -tpogHlr /opt/local/var/macports/build/foo/work/destroot/opt/local /opt [or wherever the destroot is] This would effectively turn macports into a simple way to build packages based on the maintainer's hav

Re: Universal Binaries

It is something completely different. Most linux, netbsd and freebsd packages rely on X11. MacOSX has support for x11 but the native windowing system of MacOSX is aqua. Using the -x11 option means that you don't build for X11. An increasing amount of binaries and libraries support native aqua and i

Re: Universal Binaries

Harry- You made reference to adding the -x11 tag to your variants.conf. By doing this, do you force macports to use Apple's X11? Or is it something else entirely different? thanks On Jan 24, 2009, at 12:59 PM, Harry van der Wolf wrote: 2009/1/24 Timothy Lee Thanks for the reply Harry- I'm

Re: Universal Binaries

2009/1/24 Timothy Lee Thanks for the reply Harry-I'm fairly sure that I will need to lipo together the builds for Musicbrainz' Picard. So - in your experience what are all the options that I must set after a fresh src install to have a 10.5 setup building binaries for 10.4? Nothing more than set

Re: Universal Binaries

Timothy Lee wrote: > > On Jan 24, 2009, at 3:36 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > >> On Jan 23, 2009, at 09:11, >> wrote: >> >>> Joshua Root wrote: Timothy Lee wrote: > Do you know if its possible for me (on leopard) to build x86 code (all > my macports ports) that will also run on Tiger?

Re: Universal Binaries

On Jan 24, 2009, at 3:36 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: On Jan 23, 2009, at 09:11, > wrote: Joshua Root wrote: Timothy Lee wrote: Do you know if its possible for me (on leopard) to build x86 code (all my macports ports) that will also run on Tiger? Short of physical access to an intel 10.4 ins

Re: Universal Binaries

Thanks for the reply Harry- I'm fairly sure that I will need to lipo together the builds for Musicbrainz' Picard. So - in your experience what are all the options that I must set after a fresh src install to have a 10.5 setup building binaries for 10.4? Also, does anyone know how UB deals wi

apache2 fails to install

Hi folks I'm completely stuck installing apache2. No idea what exactly is going wrong. It's a clean macports install (1.700). I even ran a manual selfupdate. Installing git-core went flawless, it's just apache2 that is causing problems. Thanks for helping me out. $ sudo port install apache2 Passw

Re: ASSP port testing, not getting all perl mods to work

Scott Haneda wrote: > I think this is telling: > > - ERROR: Net::DNS::Resolver::Programmable is not installed > - ERROR: Error is not installed > - ERROR: NetAddr::IP is not installed > - ERROR: version is not installed > * Optional prerequisite NetAddr::IP is not installed > > I can probabl

Re: Installing Apache2 on Leopard

Scott Haneda wrote: > Ports needs some caution as well, as an upgrade, iirc, can nuke your > settings as well. If you're thinking of this, it's been fixed: - Josh ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@list

Re: Universal Binaries

2009/1/24 Ryan Schmidt > On Jan 23, 2009, at 09:11, < > tim...@rochester.rr.com> wrote: > > Joshua Root wrote: >> >>> Timothy Lee wrote: >>> Do you know if its possible for me (on leopard) to build x86 code (all my macports ports) that will also run on Tiger? Short of physical a

Re: Installing Apache2 on Leopard

On Jan 24, 2009, at 5:16 AM, Jason Hirsh wrote: I have successfully accomplished this... but frankly the process just doesn't sit well with my sense of things.. I now have two complete Apache installations... and have to do work arounds to get the port installation to work (apache2ctl e

Re: Installing Apache2 on Leopard

Jason Hirsh wrote: > I have successfully accomplished this... but frankly the process just > doesn't sit well with my sense of things.. I now have two complete > Apache installations... and have to do work arounds to get the port > installation to work > > (apache2ctl etc) > > Isn't there away

Installing Apache2 on Leopard

I have successfully accomplished this... but frankly the process just doesn't sit well with my sense of things.. I now have two complete Apache installations... and have to do work arounds to get the port installation to work (apache2ctl etc) Isn't there away to install the port version

Re: ASSP port testing, not getting all perl mods to work

So... :) This trickle down effect of needing A, to find it needs B and C, and that B and C need D and E, and that can go on a while. Look what I did... ( One small issue with the mysql connector still, and I have a few questions about how to chain these all together, since there is an

Re: Universal Binaries

On Jan 23, 2009, at 09:11, wrote: Joshua Root wrote: Timothy Lee wrote: Do you know if its possible for me (on leopard) to build x86 code (all my macports ports) that will also run on Tiger? Short of physical access to an intel 10.4 install, is there anything I can do? Don't forget

Re: Error after trying to upgrade installed

On 24 Jan 2009, at 03:46, Rainer Müller wrote: Bryan Blackburn wrote: Personally, I'd like to see direct mode deprecated, and when 10.3 support is officially dropped, it can be removed entirely. Other than the old performance issues with the large number of hardlinks, I don't see any adva