Re: Dbus & Launchd errors after hard reboot

On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 3:31 AM, Michael_google gmail_Gersten < keybou...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 9:51 PM, Jasper Frumau > wrote: > > After a hard reboot I have a dbus issue similar to > > http://trac.macports.org/ticket/15081 In my logs this is shown many > times > > over: >

Re: Using MacPorts to Make OS X Fonts Render Like Linux

On May 31, 2010, at 00:56 , Joshua Root wrote: On 2010-5-31 14:38 , Brandon Allbery wrote: On May 31, 2010, at 00:29 , Joshua Root wrote: Maybe you should ask whoever you heard this from. If you can't specify a particular technical difference, I doubt anybody can point you to the right sett

Re: Using MacPorts to Make OS X Fonts Render Like Linux

On 2010-5-31 14:38 , Brandon Allbery wrote: > On May 31, 2010, at 00:29 , Joshua Root wrote: >> Maybe you should ask whoever you heard this from. If you can't specify a >> particular technical difference, I doubt anybody can point you to the >> right setting even if it exists. > > > I suspect he

Re: Using MacPorts to Make OS X Fonts Render Like Linux

On May 31, 2010, at 00:29 , Joshua Root wrote: Maybe you should ask whoever you heard this from. If you can't specify a particular technical difference, I doubt anybody can point you to the right setting even if it exists. I suspect he means this (from my .fonts.conf): ~/Library/Fonts

Re: port outdated show updates, port upgrade outdated say no updates available

On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 23:24, Joshua Root wrote: Josh > I think I got it (r68286). Please test. :-) Success, at least it's not being reported as outdated now: $ port outdated No installed ports are outdated. $ port installed gcc44 The following ports are currently installed: gcc44 @4.4.1_0

Re: Using MacPorts to Make OS X Fonts Render Like Linux

Maybe you should ask whoever you heard this from. If you can't specify a particular technical difference, I doubt anybody can point you to the right setting even if it exists. On 2010-5-31 14:27 , Danny Michel wrote: > any ideas? > > On 5/29/10 6:27 PM, Joshua Root wrote: >> Well, maybe you shoul

Re: port outdated show updates, port upgrade outdated say no updates available

On 2010-5-31 14:14 , Adam Mercer wrote: > On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 23:06, Joshua Root wrote: > >> Well, that actually explains a lot. The receipt has 'epoch 2', while the >> current portfile is at epoch 1. No idea how it got there unless you used >> a modified portfile at some point, but in any ca

Re: port outdated show updates, port upgrade outdated say no updates available

On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 23:06, Joshua Root wrote: > Well, that actually explains a lot. The receipt has 'epoch 2', while the > current portfile is at epoch 1. No idea how it got there unless you used > a modified portfile at some point, but in any case the epoch value would > have been carried ov

Re: port outdated show updates, port upgrade outdated say no updates available

On 2010-5-31 13:52 , Adam Mercer wrote: > On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 22:32, Joshua Root wrote: > >>> Is there a way the registry could have got corrupted in some strange >>> way that would result port to think gcc44 wasn't installed? >> >> Maybe. Post the contents of the receipt. > > I've uploaded

Re: port outdated show updates, port upgrade outdated say no updates available

On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 23:01, Joshua Root wrote: > You want proc get_outdated_ports, which in trunk starts at line 707 of > src/port/port.tcl. Hopefully it's not too hard to follow. Thanks, found it... just got to learn the basic of tcl now :-) Cheers Adam

Re: port outdated show updates, port upgrade outdated say no updates available

On 2010-5-31 13:53 , Adam Mercer wrote: > On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 22:41, Joshua Root wrote: > >> The quickest way to get to the bottom of this may be for you to do some >> good old fashioned printf debugging in get_outdated_ports, to see at >> what point gcc44 gets excluded from the list. > > I'

Re: port outdated show updates, port upgrade outdated say no updates available

On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 22:41, Joshua Root wrote: > The quickest way to get to the bottom of this may be for you to do some > good old fashioned printf debugging in get_outdated_ports, to see at > what point gcc44 gets excluded from the list. I'll take a look, although I'm not very familier with

Re: port outdated show updates, port upgrade outdated say no updates available

On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 22:32, Joshua Root wrote: >> Is there a way the registry could have got corrupted in some strange >> way that would result port to think gcc44 wasn't installed? > > Maybe. Post the contents of the receipt. I've uploaded it to

Re: port outdated show updates, port upgrade outdated say no updates available

On 2010-5-31 13:32 , Joshua Root wrote: > On 2010-5-31 12:47 , Adam Mercer wrote: >> The gcc44 port was at version 4.4.1_0 a while ago, i.e. for at least 7 >> months, and as I upgrade my outdated ports about once a week this has >> been a problem for a while and can't be related to the switch to >>

Re: port outdated show updates, port upgrade outdated say no updates available

On 2010-5-31 12:47 , Adam Mercer wrote: > The gcc44 port was at version 4.4.1_0 a while ago, i.e. for at least 7 > months, and as I upgrade my outdated ports about once a week this has > been a problem for a while and can't be related to the switch to > 1.9.0-rc1. This has started showing up as of

Re: port outdated show updates, port upgrade outdated say no updates available

On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 17:13, Joshua Root wrote: Josh > Very odd indeed. I can't replicate this with test ports with the same > versions and revisions. I take it 'port echo outdated' also gives you > nothing? Yes $ port outdated The following installed ports are outdated: gcc44

Re: cannot get the gnome working by following the steps written wiki/GNOME

On May 30, 2010, at 04:28, benzwt chin wrote: > On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 4:13 PM, benzwt chin wrote: >> >> dyld: Library not loaded: /opt/local/lib/libXinerama.1.dylib >> Referenced from: /opt/local/bin/quartz-wm >> Reason: no suitable image found. Did find: >>/opt/local/lib/libXinera

Re: cannot get the gnome working by following the steps written wiki/GNOME

On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 4:13 PM, benzwt chin wrote: > Hi, I cannot get the gnome working by following the steps written in > wiki/GNOME > > To debug the problem I ran the commands which written in > ~/.xinitrc.d/90-gnome.sh line by line in the xterm. > > sudo launchctl load -w > /Library/LaunchD

cannot get the gnome working by following the steps written wiki/GNOME

Hi, I cannot get the gnome working by following the steps written in wiki/GNOME To debug the problem I ran the commands which written in ~/.xinitrc.d/90-gnome.sh line by line in the xterm. sudo launchctl load -w /Library/LaunchDaemons/org.freedesktop.dbus-system.plist launchctl load -w /Library/L

FXRuby ruby 1.9 and MacPorts

Hey all, i'm surprised discovering that installing rb-fxruby installed it for ruby 1.8.x. and also installed ruby under /opt i'm using mostly ruby 1.9 (macports) and i'd like to know how to install FXRuby for that version of ruby, if any. also i'm surprised to see that when i look for ruby now i