Re: .profile file possible corrupted?

2011-08-01 Thread David Corking
james collins said: > does macports come with snow leopard? (1) No. Macports is a voluntary project, completely independent of Apple. > when I went into terminal some how my computer started downloading all this > software. Which surprised me > because originally I just wanted recoll. Like one

Fixed! Re: Recovery from p5-io-compress-zlib conflicts with p5-io-compress?

2009-09-25 Thread David Corking
---> Cleaning p5-libwww-perl inner-farne:~ dcorking$ On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 2:45 PM, David Corking wrote: > I selfupdate'd macports and then tried a > sudo port upgrade outdated > > This produced a conflict between the above packages which I attempted > to resolve with t

Recovery from p5-io-compress-zlib conflicts with p5-io-compress? was Re: How to install Perl modules

2009-09-25 Thread David Corking
I selfupdate'd macports and then tried a sudo port upgrade outdated This produced a conflict between the above packages which I attempted to resolve with three forced uninstalls. I attempted to follow the suggestions at http://trac.macports.org/ticket/21167 , a similar conflict, but I think I ha

Re: system hosed?

2009-09-15 Thread David Corking
Wolf Drechsel said: > dsl01:~ bub$ file /usr/bin/tee > /usr/bin/tee: Mach-O executable ppc Looks great. > What about "Tiger-in-the-tank" - or > is there not such a saying in English? English? Are you kidding? "Put a Tiger In Your Tank" is an ad slogan I remember from my childhood. http://en

Re: system hosed?

2009-09-14 Thread David Corking
On 2009-9-9 20:41, Wolf Drechsel wrote: with installing cairomm ( http://trac.macports.org/ticket/21230 ) As adviced I reinstalled macports from scratch - but this seems not to resolve the issue - I get the same result as before: dsl01:~ bub$ lipo -info /usr/bin/t

Re: [MacPorts] #20662: openjdk6_bootstrap contains only i386 binaries

2009-08-13 Thread David Corking
Apparently PPC support is proposed for openjdk7 (and possibly even openjdk6) http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/bsd-port-dev/2009-June/000704.html Until then, maybe someone can tell Frank if the appropriate binary plugs for PPC are available. ___ ma

Re: openjdk6 install error

2009-08-13 Thread David Corking
Frank J. R. Hanstick wrote: > Does this mean that the bootstrap is compiled on something other than gcc? The bootstrap (in this case icedtea) is compiled by a JDK (gcc and gcj) - http://icedtea.classpath.org/wiki/BuildRequirements Though I guess with some expertise, any other jdk5 or jdk6 compil

Re: openjdk6 install error

2009-08-13 Thread David Corking
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 10:05 PM, Frank J. R. Hanstick wrote: > An attempt to install openjdk6 resulted in the following error: > Error: Target org.macports.build returned: shell command " cd > "/opt/local/var/macports/build/_opt_local_var_macports_sources_rsync.macports.org_release_ports_java_open

[OT] Re: Is HFS really "scary"?

2008-02-06 Thread David Corking
Peter wrote: > > I use FreeBSD and like it just fine: in fact that's one of the reason I > > fink was fine but once it became a leaderless > > mob, I left. > > [/OT] > > This kind of crap does not encourage me to help out on this list. Lets be nice to the fink folks (I mean it. Darwin and OS X -

Re: Is HFS really "scary"?

2008-02-06 Thread David Corking
He is known for exaggeration. He once called all C++ programmers unspeakable names on a mailing list. However if you like his designs, there is an ext2 fs driver for Mac OS X! I personally am I bit frustrated with HFS+, as I experienced first-hand the limits of its fsck utility (*). But I am n

Re: off topic? Re: XCode 3.0? Safe for old school Tiger users?

2007-10-30 Thread David Corking
Anders F Björklund wrote: > > Objective-C++ eventually got included, so Objective-C 2.0 probably will. > > Someone needs to write a new runtime, though, such as the GNUstep one ? I think everything will be in Apple's public CVS - but in this mail, Apple point to deeper dependencies on Leopard.:

off topic? Re: XCode 3.0? Safe for old school Tiger users?

2007-10-30 Thread David Corking
On 10/30/07, Anders F Björklund wrote: > Xcode 2.5 will soon be available, as the end-of-the-road for Tiger... > But it probably doesn't have all the features and fixes of Xcode 3.0. Good news. > > Only the command line GNU tools in Xcode are open source, such as gcc > > itself. > > Not all too

Re: XCode 3.0? Safe for old school Tiger users?

2007-10-30 Thread David Corking
On 10/29/07, Instruct ICC wrote: > I posted a bug report about Xcode Find (in a file versus in a project) and > the developers said it should be fixed in Xcode 3.0. I think you will find the IDE portion of Xcode is closed source. If the bug is in the IDE, and Apple don't backport it themselves,

Re: XCode 3.0? Safe for old school Tiger users?

2007-10-29 Thread David Corking
On 10/29/07, Ryan Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm sure the MacPorts project would not be interested in supporting a > tweaked version of Xcode. Quite. MacPorts already has 8 versions of gcc - there is no room for any more. I have no personal interest in Objective-C 2.0, but was merely

Re: XCode 3.0? Safe for old school Tiger users?

2007-10-27 Thread David Corking
On 10/27/07, Adam Mercer wrote: > > I see it's out, and I have downloaded it. But is there any benefit to > > installing it or any risk of screwing things up if I do? > > Xcode 3 will only work on Leopard, from the release notes: > Does it come with a gcc tarball - including the new objective-c r

Re: curious: iphone compiling?

2007-09-17 Thread David Corking
On 9/17/07, grimmwerks wrote: > I'm curious regarding stuff like Chmox -- I've been able to install > the Installer.app and a lot 3rd party software - including Ruby, > Stumbler, etc. Cool - you are building a Cocoa smartphone or PDA. > What I'd REALLY like is 2 viewers for a lot of the digital m

Re: Please suggest a Mac program similar to "top" on Linux

2007-08-21 Thread David Corking
On 8/21/07, paul beard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 8/20/07, Richard Bronosky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Brilliant! I had tried top -L and that didn't seem to do anything useful. > This is what I was looking for. > > > > Call off the hounds! > > > > BTW, if you haven't explored the ful

Re: GNOME installation

2007-08-10 Thread David Corking
Seems to be some people having problems today - replies are going to posters instead of the list. I am forwarding a message from Keith that he tried to send to the list for Andreas' attention: On 8/10/07, Keith J. Schultz wrote: > Hi Andreas, > > I have mentioned this problem and as far

Re: GNOME installation

2007-08-10 Thread David Corking
On 8/10/07, Andreas Zeitler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I haven't found much information about installing GNOME via MacPorts. The GNOME maintainer, rhwood, keeps a couple of useful webpages: http://homepage.mac.com/rhwood/gnome/index.html http://homepage.mac.com/rhwood/darwinports/gnome.html >

Re: Undefined symbols in liboil ?

2007-07-26 Thread David Corking
On 7/26/07, widianto nugroho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Randall Wood wrote: > I have commited[1] some patches to apply a workaround that the Fink > folked figured out. They should be available within 12 hours. As I > don't have an Intel Mac, these are only tested on PPC. Please let me > know if t

Re: liboil build failure

2007-07-25 Thread David Corking
On 7/25/07, Stefan Bruda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Err, sorry, I meant the other way around (the upgrade is from >> 0.3.10_2 to 0.3.12_0). > > Then I'm not sure. Perhaps try deactivating the 0.3.10_2 version > first, then install the 0.3.12_0 version. Thank you for the suggestion, but I mus

Re: Undefined symbols in liboil ?

2007-07-24 Thread David Corking
On 7/24/07, David wrote: ld reports undefined symbols in liboil (starting with composite_in_argb_const_src_sse_2pix) and fails to build (log of 'sudo port install liboil' below.) I forgot to say, it is an Intel Core 2 Duo Macbook, on OS X 10.4.10 $ uname -a Darwin bamburgh.local 8.10.1 Darwin

Undefined symbols in liboil ?

2007-07-24 Thread David Corking
ld reports undefined symbols in liboil (starting with composite_in_argb_const_src_sse_2pix) and fails to build (log of 'sudo port install liboil' below.) liboil has no dependencies, so I wonder if there is something wrong with the linker or the makefile. I tried sudo port selfupdate and sudo po