Re: upgrading gcc44 not working properly?

On Sun, May 17, 2009 06:18, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > On May 16, 2009, at 12:29, MD White wrote: > >> I installed gcc44 when it was listed as Beta / "experimental" back >> in March. gcc-mp-4.4 --version : >>gcc-mp-4.4 (GCC) 4.4.0 20090313 (experimental) >> >> I saw that it is no longer listed in

Re: Tk Aqua variant gone?

On 17 Aug 2008, at 23:34, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > On Aug 16, 2008, at 13:09, Denis Bueno wrote: > >> I used (and loved) the Tk aqua variant until very recently, when I >> upgraded to Tk 8.5. I have scoured the mailing list and the bug >> tracker, but I can't find any reference to why the variant is

Re: g++-mp-4.1 missing after installing gcc41

On 19 Jan 2008, at 13:09, Ryan Schmidt wrote: On Jan 19, 2008, at 04:07, Hui Li wrote: After installed gcc41, I found that g++-mp-4.1 is missing, and /opt/ local/include/gcc41/ does not even exist (but gcc-mp-4.1 seems working, at least it can print out the built-in specs by specifying -v)

Re: MacPorts 1.6 still supports OS X 10.3 Panther?

On 3 Jan 2008, at 01:12, Walt Pawley wrote: At 8:12 AM -0700 12/29/07, Chris Janton wrote: I would be glad to help figure things out for Panther. I don't expect to be upgrading that OS for some time (long) so having a working, viable MacPorts is important to me. Sadly, supporting older versio

Re: ?typo in portfile for gcc43 with gfortran

On Dec 27, 2007, at 12:37 AM, George Nurser wrote: On 26/12/2007, Ryan Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Dec 26, 2007, at 09:55, George Nurser wrote: I have just tried to install the latest snapshot (20071221) of gcc43. I did sudo port -v install gcc43 +gfortran & got a failure The fol

Re: grads fails because gcc40 fails ?

On Dec 20, 2007, at 9:07 PM, Ludovic Hirlimann wrote: On 20 déc. 07, at 20:20, Barry McInnes wrote: gcc42 installs for me, but gcc40 does not. Is there a way to force the build of stellarium and others, to use gcc42 instead of the default gcc40 ? gcc_select ? Nah, this won't have a

Re: plans for 64bit support (Joshua Root)

On Dec 20, 2007, at 10:22 PM, Markus Weissmann wrote: On Dec 20, 2007, at 5:03 PM, Vincent Lefevre wrote: On 2007-12-20 17:59:25 +1100, Joshua Root wrote: [1] <http://lixom.net/~olof/64bit-perf.pdf> [2] <http://www.geekpatrol.ca/2006/09/32-bit-vs-64-bit-performance/> I don&

Re: plans for 64bit support (Joshua Root)

On Dec 20, 2007, at 5:03 PM, Vincent Lefevre wrote: On 2007-12-20 17:59:25 +1100, Joshua Root wrote: [1] [2] I don't understand why they say that 5 instructions are needed for constants in

Re: 64 bits & 32 bits ports

Salut François, On Dec 14, 2007, at 4:26 PM, François Sausset wrote: Hello, Is there a mean to build ports for x86_64 architectures and i386 ones together? If not, how to specify macports to build ports with the option "- arch x86_64"? Indeed, for some ports a "universal" variant exists,

Re: Ion3 license and possible removal

Hi Pierre, thanks for bringing this up here: Mr. Valkonen's license is absolutely unbearable. As an alternative: Perhaps you can bring the port back to the last sane licensed version - don't know if this is useful and/or possible. Either that or remove it please. Regards, -Markus On Dec

Re: First port installation fails

On Dec 13, 2007, at 4:50 PM, Richard Tobin wrote: As the error message says: "You must install or activate this package with '-f' (force) as it needs to overwrite files installed by the perl5.8 port" The problem is not that the error message isn't clear. It's that you don't expect to get err

Re: not specifically MacPorts but tools-related

Ports' gcc_select really is beta and requires some work; it _should_ not interfere with any port build but probably will do with some. So it is not intended for getting ports to build with a different version of gcc -- a goal that would probably require quite some effort. Regards, -Markus -- Di

Re: Speed up build phase with "make -j"

On 31.10.2007, at 12:36, Vincent Lefevre wrote: On 2007-10-31 12:26:44 +0100, Markus Weissmann wrote: On 31.10.2007, at 05:13, Vincent Lefevre wrote: I disagree. Port maintainers should test their port to see if they work with "make -j". Well, you cannot reliably test this. If yo

Re: Speed up build phase with "make -j"

On 31.10.2007, at 05:13, Vincent Lefevre wrote: On 2007-10-30 16:20:18 +0100, Markus Weissmann wrote: On 30.10.2007, at 13:52, Vincent Lefevre wrote: The bug could also be reported upstream, so that a ".NOTPARALLEL:" is added to the Makefile. Well, this simply is not going to wo

Re: Speed up build phase with "make -j"

On 30.10.2007, at 13:52, Vincent Lefevre wrote: On 2007-10-30 12:43:52 +0100, Anders F Björklund wrote: Weissmann Markus: Yes, but I meant this to be a per-Portfile choice so a maintainer can mark his/her port as being able to build in parallel. Doing this with the sledgehammer for all ports

Re: Interrupting and resuming the "Building" phase?

x27;m new to MacPorts. How can I do this? > > Thanks, > Adam > > ___ > macports-users mailing list > macports-users@lists.macosforge.org > http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users -- Dipl. Inf. (FH) Markus Weissmann http://www.mweissmann.de/ http://www