o > o > If there was some way to indicate that something
o > o > required action by me,
o > o o like say, a ticket assigned or CC'd to you? ;-)
o >
o > Is that true? If I, at a minimum, look at all e-mails cc'd to me, will that
o > be sufficent to make sure I'm not holding anyone up? If not, maybe
Salvatore Domenick Desiano wrote:
o > If there was some way to indicate that something
o > required action by me,
o
o like say, a ticket assigned or CC'd to you? ;-)
Is that true? If I, at a minimum, look at all e-mails cc'd to me, will
that be sufficent to make sure I'm not holding anyone up
o > If there was some way to indicate that something
o > required action by me,
o
o like say, a ticket assigned or CC'd to you? ;-)
Is that true? If I, at a minimum, look at all e-mails cc'd to me, will
that be sufficent to make sure I'm not holding anyone up? If not, maybe
that would be a good
On Mar 17, 2008, at 10:26 AM, Rainer Müller wrote:
In addition, ports that are seriously broken (ie, don't build,
security vulnerability, distfile no longer available) can be fixed
to work (without major changes) without waiting for the timeout
already.
These points are not exactly clari
Daniel J. Luke wrote:
On Mar 17, 2008, at 9:37 AM, Rainer Müller wrote:
So, this proposal was out now for about a week and nobody replied.
If you don't like it, please tell me at least why you think it is
not a good idea.
We already have the 72 hour timeout, the option of putting
'openmai
On Mar 17, 2008, at 9:37 AM, Rainer Müller wrote:
So, this proposal was out now for about a week and nobody replied.
If you don't like it, please tell me at least why you think it is
not a good idea.
We already have the 72 hour timeout, the option of putting
'openmaintainer' on our ports o
On Mar 17, 2008, at 9:52 AM, Salvatore Domenick Desiano wrote:
If there was some way to indicate that something
required action by me,
like say, a ticket assigned or CC'd to you? ;-)
--
Daniel J. Luke
++
| * [EMAIL PROTECT
As a maintainer who is sometimes "away", I like the idea in principle,
but I think there may be a simpler problem that will affect whether
this is necesary. The volume on the MP lists has gone up astronomically
of late, meaning that I have to shunt my MP email into a folder and read
it itermit
Rainer Müller wrote:
It happens from time to time that some maintainer is busy with work or
school, has to move, is on vacation or attends some other event which
prevents him from taking action on new tickets.
So I want to setup a new wiki page (like MaintainerAway) where anybody
can add hims
Hi,
It happens from time to time that some maintainer is busy with work or
school, has to move, is on vacation or attends some other event which
prevents him from taking action on new tickets.
So I want to setup a new wiki page (like MaintainerAway) where anybody
can add himself with a small e
10 matches
Mail list logo
