I gave caffeinate a try, and set my system sleep time to a more reasonable
timeout [30 minutes], but since smartctl isn't an interactive process [a
tsr?], the system never stays awake long enough to finish a whole test. I
even added the -m option to prevent the disk from idle sleeping but that
did
On 6/28/18, 4:00 PM, "Ryan Schmidt" wrote:
On Jun 28, 2018, at 14:56, Langer, Stephen A. (Fed) wrote:
> It's the same problem as
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftrac.macports.org%2Fticket%2F56461&data=02%7C01%7Cstephen.langer%40nist.gov%7C43b4
Riccardo Mottola wrote:
> Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>>> the build directory is owned by root - could it be that macports user is
>>> trying to use it?
>> We are seeing a lot of reports of this type of problem since the release of
>> MacPorts 2.5. I don't know why.
>>
>
> that is very reassuring :)
>
On Jun 28, 2018, at 14:56, Langer, Stephen A. (Fed) wrote:
> It's the same problem as https://trac.macports.org/ticket/56461 and
> https://trac.macports.org/ticket/54981. Is that a problem with glib2 or
> with all of the ports that use it?
My understanding is that those other ports are not
On 6/28/18, 3:30 PM, "Ryan Schmidt" wrote:
On Jun 28, 2018, at 14:00, Langer, Stephen A. (Fed) wrote:
> It *is* rebuilding glib2 when I run "port mpkg oof3d". I have -x11
+no_x11 +quartz in variants.conf, but glib2 is installed with +x11. Is mpkg
noticing that the instal
On Jun 28, 2018, at 14:00, Langer, Stephen A. (Fed) wrote:
> It *is* rebuilding glib2 when I run "port mpkg oof3d". I have -x11 +no_x11
> +quartz in variants.conf, but glib2 is installed with +x11. Is mpkg
> noticing that the installed variant isn't the default variant and thinking
> that
On Jun 28, 2018, at 13:10, Langer, Stephen A. (Fed) wrote:
> I just ran "sudo port mpkg oof3d", without any other arguments. I had
> changed my PATH so that only the minimal, non-standardly-located ports
> directory was visible. (Minimal means only dependencies of oof3 are
> installed.) I
On 6/28/18, 12:17 PM, "Ryan Schmidt" wrote:
On Jun 28, 2018, at 11:02, Langer, Stephen A. (Fed) wrote:
> In any case, thanks to all of your suggestions, I can now build and
install using the Portfile. I can create an mpkg and install from it.
However, the contents of the m
Oops -- forgot to reply to the list.
On 6/28/18, 2:09 PM, "Langer, Stephen A. (Fed)"
mailto:stephen.lan...@nist.gov>> wrote:
On 6/28/18, 12:17 PM, "Ryan Schmidt" wrote:
On Jun 28, 2018, at 11:02, Langer, Stephen A. (Fed) wrote:
> In any case, thanks to all of your suggestio
On Jun 28, 2018, at 11:02, Langer, Stephen A. (Fed) wrote:
> In any case, thanks to all of your suggestions, I can now build and install
> using the Portfile. I can create an mpkg and install from it. However, the
> contents of the mpkg are incorrect. There are missing symbols in
> libgio
On 6/28/18, 4:54 AM, "Ryan Schmidt" wrote:
On Jun 27, 2018, at 13:47, Langer, Stephen A. (Fed) wrote:
> It requires knowing the installation prefix during the distutils build
stage, which certainly can be done, but I don't think it's standard in the
distutils world. At leas
On 6/28/18, 11:12 AM, "macports-users on behalf of Langer, Stephen A. (Fed)"
wrote:
On 6/28/18, 5:39 AM, "Joshua Root" wrote:
On 2018-6-28 18:54 , Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> macOS has been around for over 17 years. It would be weird if in all
that time Pyth
On 6/28/18, 5:39 AM, "Joshua Root" wrote:
On 2018-6-28 18:54 , Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> macOS has been around for over 17 years. It would be weird if in all that
time Python hasn't developed an easy way to create correct dylibs. My
assumption therefore is that such an easy method
Hi,
Ryan Schmidt wrote:
the build directory is owned by root - could it be that macports user is trying
to use it?
We are seeing a lot of reports of this type of problem since the release of
MacPorts 2.5. I don't know why.
that is very reassuring :)
Some fixes or workarounds?
Riccardo
On 2018-6-28 18:54 , Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> macOS has been around for over 17 years. It would be weird if in all that
> time Python hasn't developed an easy way to create correct dylibs. My
> assumption therefore is that such an easy method does exist, I just don't
> know what it is since I'm
On Jun 27, 2018, at 13:47, Langer, Stephen A. (Fed) wrote:
> It requires knowing the installation prefix during the distutils build stage,
> which certainly can be done, but I don't think it's standard in the distutils
> world. At least, the prefix isn't accessible to the build_ext command i
16 matches
Mail list logo
