On Fri, 16 Mar 2018 23:49:57 +0100, Joshua Root wrote:
Dave Horsfall wrote:
On Fri, 16 Mar 2018, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
What should I be using now?
Possibly git.
And...
On Fri, 16 Mar 2018, Chris Jones wrote:
Sounds to me like you are describing a git hosted software project,
which you
On Fri, 16 Mar 2018 09:11:56 +0100, Dave Horsfall
wrote:
What should I be using now?
Here's what I have so far, which bogs down in the build pretty early due
to 20 year old weirdness, I guess….
Hmmm... I'll take a look, but if there's something a bit more modern
then of course I'll use i
seen under 10.12.6 with port 2.4.2:
`sudo port install py27-dulwich' leads to
---> Computing dependencies for py27-dulwich
---> Verifying checksums for py27-dulwich
Error: Checksum (rmd160) mismatch for dulwich-0.18.5.tar.gz
Error: Checksum (sha256) mismatch for dulwich-0.18.5.tar.gz
Error: Fa
On Sat, 11 Mar 2017 10:29:43 +0100, Mihai Moldovan
wrote:
On 10.03.2017 06:32 PM, j. van den hoff wrote:
before I start: yes, I have seen and read ticket #53414. I did not help:
Naturally not, this change has only been deployed with 2.4.1.
In order to get the selfupdate to work, either
before I start: yes, I have seen and read ticket #53414. I did not help:
I tried to to to selfupdate from 2.3.5 to 2.4.1 today (MacOS 10.11.6). it
failed with
configure: === configuring in vendor/tcl/unix
(/opt/local/var/macports/sources/rsync.macports.org/release/base/vendor/tcl/unix)
con
On Tue, 07 Mar 2017 15:41:42 +0100, René J.V. Bertin
wrote:
Thanks. This doesn't really answer the question if /bin/sh is still bash
but I suppose there is little chance that has changed since 10.9 .
right. and I would have thought _that_ part of your original mail (the
main part seeming
On Tue, 07 Mar 2017 15:12:07 +0100, René J.V. Bertin
wrote:
Hi,
Can someone please confirm whether /bin/sh is still POSIX compliant on
10.12.latest (i.e. `/bin/sh --version` shows it's actually bash), please?
thanks,
René
from `man bash':
"If bash is invoked with the name sh, it tries
