On 2018-03-24 13:54, Jan Starý wrote:
> The 'platforms' field of a Portfile is currently
> both _required_ and _ignored_. By the Guide,
>
> A list of the platforms on which the port has been tested.
> Required, but not interpreted in any way by the software
>
On Mar 25, 2018, at 01:49, Jan Stary wrote:
> On Mar 24 14:14:37, Mojca wrote:
>> On 24 March 2018 at 13:54, Jan Starý wrote:
>>> The 'platforms' field of a Portfile is currently
>>> both _required_ and _ignored_. By the Guide,
>>>
>>>A lis
On 25 March 2018 at 08:49, Jan Stary wrote:
> On Mar 24 14:14:37, mojca.miklavec.li...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> We currently have this ticket high on our priority list:
>> https://trac.macports.org/ticket/15712
>
> That's ten years old, and "there's no code written yet"
> as of 13 days ago.
On Mar 24 14:14:37, mojca.miklavec.li...@gmail.com wrote:
> On 24 March 2018 at 13:54, Jan Starý wrote:
> > The 'platforms' field of a Portfile is currently
> > both _required_ and _ignored_. By the Guide,
> >
> > A list of the platforms on whi
On Mar 24, 2018, at 08:14, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>> I propose that the 'platforms' field be no longer required
>> if it is ignored, and if it stays, let it be a free form text,
>> as opposed to a predefined definitive list of all unixes.
>
> We'll need it to speci
On 24 March 2018 at 13:54, Jan Starý wrote:
> The 'platforms' field of a Portfile is currently
> both _required_ and _ignored_. By the Guide,
>
> A list of the platforms on which the port has been tested.
> Required, but not interpreted in any way
The 'platforms' field of a Portfile is currently
both _required_ and _ignored_. By the Guide,
A list of the platforms on which the port has been tested.
Required, but not interpreted in any way by the software
at this time; it is purely informational for users.
Also
