FaceBook iPhone Application Updated With Accessibility Fixes
The FaceBook.com iPhone application has been updated to version 3.02. The
update focuses on VoiceOver compatibility, and accessibility fixes. The rapidity
with which the developer has addressed the accessibility issues is
extraordinary,
Why am I getting these? When the 3gs first came out, I seem to
remember that Cara was quite adamant that discussion of it on the mv
list was off topic so she created a new list for it. Surely, things
like this would fit in better on the other list?
Sorry if I spelt your name wrong btw Cara.
On 0
I'm with Ben here. I don't really appreciate receiving Maccessibility
updates. Is there not a list I can subscribe to if I want to receive
them? Not only that, but they are snippets with a link to the full
story. I request that these not be sent to macvisionaries.
On 9/4/09, ben mustill-rose wr
iPhone discussion has always been welcome here. :) The other list is
more strictly focused on the iPhone, but we would have to also ban
iPod, Airport Express/Extreme, and all sorts of other things from this
list if we banned iPhone discussion. After all, the iPhone is used in
conjunction
Hi,
I don't mean to come over as unsupportive Josh, because I'm 110%
behind what you do with lioncourt and maccessibility, to the point
where soon after Christmas when my schedule will have changed
significantly I'd love to start contributing myself or at least figure
out some way of supporting m
Hello; I get a lot of email daily from the several lists I'm
subscribed to. I don't personally have a problem with the news
updates as long as they are really news. I think the more important
question with this one is does this mean they have or plan to fix the
regular facebook so mac u
Hi,
Since the lack of accessibility of the iPhone Facebook application has
been discussed frequently in the past few days, I thought this news
posting was completely relevant. The news updates in general are
interesting and of high quality. Keep bringing them on, I say. It
would be nice i
Josh could just paste the article
rather than simply including a link to the maccessibility website.
Best,
Donna
-Original Message-
From: Woody Anna Dresner
Sent: Saturday, September 05, 2009 12:48 AM
To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [Mac-cessibility News] FaceBook i
Donna
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Woody Anna Dresner
> Sent: Saturday, September 05, 2009 12:48 AM
> To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Mac-cessibility News] FaceBook iPhone Application
> Updated With Accessibility Fixes
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
e article rather than simply
>> including a link to the maccessibility website.
>> Best,
>> Donna
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Woody Anna Dresner
>> Sent: Saturday, September 05, 2009 12:48 AM
>> To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
>> Subject
On Behalf Of Brett Campbell
> Sent: Saturday, September 05, 2009 12:27 PM
> To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Mac-cessibility News] FaceBook iPhone Application Updated
> With Accessibility Fixes
>
>
> I'm guessing the link is to increase the hit coun
m
> Subject: Re: [Mac-cessibility News] FaceBook iPhone Application Updated
> With Accessibility Fixes
>
>
> I think Josh provides an excellent service and I can click on a link
> now and then to get to it. I don't count clicks on my blog but almost
> always post a link
I don't mind the updates from the Mac site but would rather get the
full posting rather than just a half paragraph. I know that one reason
updates come in this way is to encourage people to visit the actual
site. But, I think its an extra and unnecessary step myself.
On Sep 4, 2009, at 7:
If the email contained the full text of the article I probably
wouldn't have minded so much. If a user is going through a list of
there emails and only reading the ones that interest them, assuming
there not interested in yours, its not going to take any more time to
skip over your email if the fu
e-
> From: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
> [mailto:macvisionar...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Brett Campbell
> Sent: Saturday, September 05, 2009 12:27 PM
> To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Mac-cessibility News] FaceBook iPhone Application
> Updated
>
: Woody Anna Dresner
>> Sent: Saturday, September 05, 2009 12:48 AM
>> To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
>> Subject: Re: [Mac-cessibility News] FaceBook iPhone Application
>> Updated With Accessibility Fixes
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Since the lack of ac
Once again you all really do need to remember here that just
because those of us here in America seem to have basically fast, free-
flowing internet access, that's just not the case in all areas of the
world, or even in this country. (US)
There are many people whom pay based on bandwid
yes, well said, we use starband
http://starband.net
and we only have 5 gb internet transfer for every seven day roling
average, and trust me friends, you don't know how much you use the
internet untel you geto n starband:(
mike
On Sep 5, 2009, at 1:55 PM, Cara Quinn wrote:
>
> Once again y
Cara - Appologies if it came across as less than constructive critique
at your end, I thought I made it pretty obvious that I wasn't knocking
Josh's efforts at all. Perhaps it was the comparrison that came over
wrong, for what it's worth, it was written light heartedly at this
end. Not everyone
Hi Ben, no you didn't spell my name wrong, but thanks for the
concern. YOu rock! :)
Now, regarding iPhone discussion here; my apologies if I ever made
it seem that it was unwelcome.
In the list guidelines I continually post, I specifically mention
that all Apple content is welcom
Scott, no prob;
:) I actually wasn't pointing any fingers on the critique thing but
rather suggesting that ppl might begin thinking in the direction you
are in the sense of what would benefit the whole rather than a few
parts.
To address your issue, yes, if someone wanted to read
I see your point, just for some reason, I appear to be making the same
one in reverse lol.
If this is mainly about the convenience of those on flakey or
expensive connections, and every maccessibility post is going to be
relevant and of interest to a good number of people, plus the majority
of pe
Hey again Scott, for the record, I'm actually one of these people
who would prefer to read the post in the message, however, this is not
something I'd ever advocate for nor sign off on, simply because I
truly feel it's not the best way to manage these types of postings to
these lists.
Nice post, Scott. These are all very good points.
donna
-Original Message-
From: Scott Chesworth
Sent: Saturday, September 05, 2009 6:44 PM
To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [Mac-cessibility News] FaceBook iPhone Application Updated With
Accessibility Fixes
Cara
Some of us have been told to move iPhone discussions to the viphone
list rather than posting them here. I'm on the fence about this issue
as the Macintosh and iPhone have very different user interfaces, do a
whole bunch of different things but work together almost seamlessly.
I recently
Hi Chris, who told you to move discussions from here?…
To everyone, for future reference, if Josh or I say a topic is okay
for the list, regardless of what any other lister says, then that
topic is fine to bring up on the list.
iPhone topics (even that of ATT issues related to the i
Thanks. I didn't have my feelings hurt as I did think that this group
had hoped to get iPhone stuff moved to the viphone list. I do also
think that there are far too few blinks using any sort of Apple
equipment to really support as many lists as we have already.
Of course, I started the v
onaries@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Mac-cessibility News] FaceBook iPhone Application
> Updated With Accessibility Fixes
>
>
> Cara - Appologies if it came across as less than constructive critique
> at your end, I thought I made it pretty obvious that I wasn't knocki
28 matches
Mail list logo
