On Feb 16, 2011, at 11:52 AM, Michael Thurman wrote:
just post t he text if you want to post stuff here these stes are
rediculous anywayif you can't copy and paste the text into the E mail why
bother these sites take forever and are almost universally porly written
1. These messages
For my part, I'm going only to say this. I suspect that what we're dealing
with here is a fundamental misunderstanding. Seems to me to be the case that,
if we had this explanation earlier, (perhaps at the point of first criticism),
it would never have gone to this level. I myself have found
Hi Josh.
The only thing most of us don't like is that the server only send a part of the
articles instead the whole articles. Personally I like the website and really
like the way you write the articles and explains how things works, but the way
the news is being sended to the lists is very
I guess my problem whenever this topic comes up--and it comes up kind
of a lot--is that Josh and the other mods don't owe us anything. If
they feel their services aren't appreciated enough, they're perfectly
within their rights to stop providing them. If we feel we aren't
getting enough out of
Please.
Can we all spend a few seconds to proof read and spell check our messages
before sending them off? Especially when you are attacking someone for poorly
written content. lol. The irony is dripping all over this. An no. I'm not a
list mod. I just like to be able to get through a 2
I'm tired of reading 95% of the news and then click the link to open the
website to read the last 10 words. I don't know if this is the limit of the
blogging system, but I don't have time . to open up a website just to read the
whole news when receiving more than 200 mails each day.
Best
I must admit, I totally agree with this. What is the point in directing us to
only read a few extra words? This seems to happen with the majority of these
postings. Why not just paste the entire article in here?
On 14 Feb 2011, at 09:51, Søren Jensen wrote:
I'm tired of reading
Quite correct. IF you ask me, this is getting just plain f. IF the intention
is to encourage us to visit the site for the story, why not just post the
blasted link and be done with it for goodness sake. I'm also growing very
weary of this infantile stupid practice of making us go to the
Twitterific for Mac 4.0 Is Released Sans VoiceOver Accessibility
The IconFactory has released the much anticipated Twitterific 4.0 for Mac OS X.
Though Twitterific was one of the first OS X Twitter clients to incorporate
accessibility, the application has taken a huge step backward with this
Man, why does this continue to happen.
I don't understand how or why breaking accessibility happens. I thought that if
the programmers coded the app incorporating Apple's accessibility guidelines,
it would simply work. For that matter, I thought that if the programmer simply
used Cocoa as the
10 matches
Mail list logo
