Sarai D. Bucciarelli www.linkedin.com/in/SaraiDBucciarelli
Hi:
Is anyone getting the new 2016 Macbook Pro? If so, which version? With, or
without touchbar?
--
The following information is important for all members of the Mac Visionaries
list.
If you have any questions or concerns about the
> Is anyone getting the new 2016 Macbook Pro? If so, which version? With, or
> without touchbar?
>
> --
> The following information is important for all members of the Mac Visionaries
> list.
>
> If you have any questions or concerns about the running of this
288
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On 4/11/2016, at 04:21, Sarai Bucciarelli
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Sarai D. Bucciarelli www.linkedin.com/in/SaraiDBucciarelli
>>
>> Hi:
>> Is anyone getting the new 2016 Macbook Pro? If so, which version? With, or
&
gt;>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Sarai D. Bucciarelli www.linkedin.com/in/SaraiDBucciarelli
>>>
>>> Hi:
>>> Is anyone getting the new 2016 Macbook Pro? If so, which version? With, or
>>> without touchbar?
>>>
>>> --
>&
.com
>>> Mobile: +64 21 2288 288
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>>> On 4/11/2016, at 04:21, Sarai Bucciarelli
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sarai D. Bucciarelli www.linkedin.com/in/SaraiDBucciarelli
>>>>
>
ith touchbar.
>
> David Chittenden, MSc, MRCAA
> Email: dchitten...@gmail.com
> Mobile: +64 21 2288 288
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On 4/11/2016, at 04:21, Sarai Bucciarelli
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Sarai D. Bucciarelli www.linkedin.com/in/SaraiDBucciarell
t; On Nov 3, 2016, at 10:28 AM, David Chittenden
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I will probably get the 13" with touchbar.
>>>>
>>>> David Chittenden, MSc, MRCAA
>>>> Email: dchitten...@gmail.com
>>>> Mobile: +64 21 2288 2
uch
>>>> bar?
>>>>> On Nov 3, 2016, at 10:28 AM, David Chittenden
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I will probably get the 13" with touchbar.
>>>>>
>>>>> David Chittenden, MSc, MRCAA
>>&g
>>>
>>> I will probably get the 13" with touchbar.
>>>
>>> David Chittenden, MSc, MRCAA
>>> Email: dchitten...@gmail.com
>>> Mobile: +64 21 2288 288
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>>> On 4/11/2016, at 04:21, Sar
gt;>>>
>>>> David Chittenden, MSc, MRCAA
>>>> Email: dchitten...@gmail.com
>>>> Mobile: +64 21 2288 288
>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>
>>>>> On 4/11/2016, at 06:26, Sarai Bucciarelli
>>>>>
;>>>> curve, as much as possible, and therefore, remain relavent.
>>>>>
>>>>> David Chittenden, MSc, MRCAA
>>>>> Email: dchitten...@gmail.com
>>>>> Mobile: +64 21 2288 288
>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>&
never possible. This way, I stay ahead
>>>>>> / in the curve, as much as possible, and therefore, remain relavent.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> David Chittenden, MSc, MRCAA
>>>>>> Email: dchitten...@gmail.com
>>>>>> Mobile: +64 21
t;>>>
>>>> David Chittenden, MSc, MRCAA
>>>> Email: dchitten...@gmail.com
>>>> Mobile: +64 21 2288 288
>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>
>>>>> On 4/11/2016, at 04:21, Sarai Bucciarelli
>>>>> wrote:
>&g
>> Email: dchitten...@gmail.com
>> Mobile: +64 21 2288 288
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>>> On 4/11/2016, at 04:21, Sarai Bucciarelli
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Sarai D. Bucciarelli www.linkedin.com/in/SaraiDBucciarelli
>>&g
to the
>>>>>> latest, not last years tech, whenever possible. This way, I stay ahead /
>>>>>> in the curve, as much as possible, and therefore, remain relavent.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> David Chittenden, MSc, MRCAA
>>>>>> Em
gt;>>>
>>>> What made you pick that particular one? Why not get the one without touch
>>>> bar?
>>>>> On Nov 3, 2016, at 10:28 AM, David Chittenden
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I will probably get the 13&q
t;>
>>>> What made you pick that particular one? Why not get the one without touch
>>>> bar?
>>>>> On Nov 3, 2016, at 10:28 AM, David Chittenden >>>> <mailto:dchitten...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
, MSc, MRCAA
>>> Email: dchitten...@gmail.com
>>> Mobile: +64 21 2288 288
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>>> On 4/11/2016, at 04:21, Sarai Bucciarelli
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sarai D. Bucciarelli www.l
<mailto:dchitten...@gmail.com>
>>>> Mobile: +64 21 2288 288
>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>
>>>>> On 4/11/2016, at 06:26, Sarai Bucciarelli >>>> <mailto:sarai.bucciare...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>
ooglegroups.com [mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com]
On Behalf Of Sarai Bucciarelli
Sent: Friday, 4 November 2016 6:27 AM
To: 'Chris Blouch' via MacVisionaries
Subject: Re: 2016 Macbook Pro
What made you pick that particular one? Why not get the one without touch bar?
> On Nov
@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: 2016 Macbook Pro
Hi all! How are you all? I'm interesting in getting the new MacBook Pro 13
inches next year, but the problem for me is that it does not have USV drive.
In other words, I can't use a UsV drive,and I use USV drives for school. Now I
have a MacBo
ies@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Helga Schreiber
> Sent: Friday, 4 November 2016 11:09 AM
> To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: 2016 Macbook Pro
>
> Hi all! How are you all? I'm interesting in getting the new MacBook Pro 13
> inches next year, but the problem
I forgot to ask you guys, so that means here willl not be any more uSV drives?
If so, how do people will transfer informations? Just wondering! Thanks! i use
my mac for school! And I think carrying an adaptor will not work so well
sometimes! Tht is only my opinion. I never heard of USV C or Thun
Hi,
There will still be drives, just the interface for accessing the drive is
changing for the moment. I doubt USB will die immediately, it's just an
evolving sort of thing. Consider that people probably wondered similar things
with the demise of the floppy disk. Things change and new produc
oups.com>[mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
>> <mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com>] On Behalf Of Helga Schreiber
>> Sent: Friday, 4 November 2016 11:09 AM
>> To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com <mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com>
>> Subject: Re: 2016 M
: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: 2016 Macbook Pro
Hey Simon. Ok I understand. Hey I hve a question, how one wil use windows on
the Mac computer without function keys? Just wondering! Do you hve any idea> I
look forward in hearing from you soon. Thanks and God bless!
Helga Schreiber
Gr
s on the touch bar, but they are all opinions and
everyone should come to their own decision.
On Thursday, November 3, 2016 at 11:21:21 AM UTC-4, Sarai Bucciarelli wrote:
>
>
> Sarai D. Bucciarelli www.linkedin.com/in/SaraiDBucciarelli
>
> Hi:
> Is anyone getting the new
the touch bar model
> with 16 gigs of ram you would pay at least 2000 dollars, and I am not about
> to do that. .
>
>
>
> Those are my thoughts on the touch bar, but they are all opinions and
> everyone should come to their own decision.
>
>
>> On Thursday, N
: MacVisionaries
Subject: Re: 2016 Macbook Pro
I ordered the 13 inch, non touch bar model, with the 2.0 processor, 256 gigs of
storage, and 16 gigs of ram. A few days ago I wrote an extensive post on Apple
Vis, about what went into this decision; I have copied and pasted some of that
post below; I’m
egroups.com] On Behalf Of Tree Mabry
> Sent: Saturday, 5 November 2016 3:56 PM
> To: MacVisionaries
> Subject: Re: 2016 Macbook Pro
>
> I ordered the 13 inch, non touch bar model, with the 2.0 processor, 256 gigs
> of storage, and 16 gigs of ram. A few days ago I wrote an extensiv
x27;t want. I decided to grit my teeth and go
> for the base model, but I upgraded the ram to 16 gigs, which I believe is the
> best way to future proof a computer. If you wanted to get the touch bar model
> with 16 gigs of ram you would pay at least 2000 dollars, and I am not about
>
dual
>>
>>
>>
>> From: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
>> <mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com>
>> [mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
>> <mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com>] On Behalf Of Tree Mabry
>> Sent: Saturday, 5 November 2
gt;>>
>>>
>>>
>>> From: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
>>> <mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com>
>>> [mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
>>> <mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com>] On Behalf Of Tree Mabry
>>
; to the individual
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> From: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
>>>> [mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Tree Mabry
>>>> Sent: Saturday, 5 November 2016 3:56 PM
>>>> To: MacVis
> to the individual
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> From: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
>>>> <mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com>
>>>> [mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
>>>> <mailto:macvisionari
gt;>>> Cheers for this, it’s interesting reading,
>>>>>
>>>>> I’m surprized about the storage size though, I would have gone more but
>>>>> up to the individual
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Fro
Hi I have a 2012 mbp with an ssd. I also have a very large audio book
library. When adding to iTunes iTunes goes into a caniption fit and
says busy for hours. So here's my question, with the 2016 mbp's having
faster cpu's and ssd's does this still happen when importing a big
folder of media into iT
Hi there, I have a Mid 2015 with the full Terabyte of storage (SSD) and the 2.8
I7 quad core and it’s lightning fast. Virtual machines, disk access, moving
data around the network, everything you would want it’s blazing fast. The
wireless is also quite good.
Smaller disk drives may be slower
Hi Scott, Thanks for the info! But, I was specifically asking about
adding large media folders into iTunes which sends my 2012 mbp into
busy busy busy for hours. I was also asking about the new 2016 MacBook
pro's.
Thanks Jeff
On 1/16/17, Scott Granados wrote:
> Hi there, I have a Mid 2015 with t
Hi Jeff,
How much RAM in your 2012 machine? I have a 2011 MBP with a home-made Fusion
drive and 16 GB of RAM and do not experience the issues you're mentioning. I
have upgraded a few of the 2012 models for colleagues and increased memory
along with the SSD has made considerable differences in
Jeff,
Any chance you have Apple Music service or iTunes match These services try to
do a bit more with sound files when they are imported. Still I wouldn't think
it would stall your entire system.
I do notice with my corporate Macintosh, that it does not like me putting the
system to sleep wh
l Message-
From: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com [mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com]
On Behalf Of Scott Granados
Sent: Tuesday, 17 January 2017 6:56 AM
To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: question for anybody with a 2016 macbook pro
Hi there, I have a Mid 2015 with the full Terabyte of
2017 6:56 AM
> To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: question for anybody with a 2016 macbook pro
>
> Hi there, I have a Mid 2015 with the full Terabyte of storage (SSD) and the
> 2.8 I7 quad core and it’s lightning fast. Virtual machines, disk access,
> moving data a
ps.com]
On Behalf Of Scott Granados
Sent: Tuesday, 17 January 2017 6:56 AM
To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: question for anybody with a 2016 macbook pro
Hi there, I have a Mid 2015 with the full Terabyte of storage (SSD) and the 2.8
I7 quad core and it’s lightning fast. Virtual mach
he delay and I'm running it on a 1GB wired network
-Original Message-
From: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com [mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com]
On Behalf Of Scott Granados
Sent: Tuesday, 17 January 2017 6:56 AM
To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: question for anybo
. I usually shut off VO and use my windows pc and let itunes
churn over night. My question came about because i heard the new 2016
macbook pro has faster cpu and faster ram. Maybe when I get a 2016 MBP
I'll try your automatically add to itunes option since all my stuff
will be on one single
over night. My question came about because i heard the new 2016
macbook pro has faster cpu and faster ram. Maybe when I get a 2016 MBP
I'll try your automatically add to itunes option since all my stuff
will be on one single drive.
Jeff
On 1/17/17, E.T. wrote:
>Just did this last nig
inch
> macbook pro. I have itunes preferences set to not copy. The way I add
> books to itunes is to launch itunes, hit command+o and point the file
> browser at my library. Itunes then goes into saying busy busy busy for
> hours. I usually shut off VO and use my windows pc and let itunes
&
macbook pro. I have itunes preferences set to not copy. The way I add
> books to itunes is to launch itunes, hit command+o and point the file
> browser at my library. Itunes then goes into saying busy busy busy for
> hours. I usually shut off VO and use my windows pc and let itunes
&
have itunes preferences set to not copy. The way I add
> books to itunes is to launch itunes, hit command+o and point the file
> browser at my library. Itunes then goes into saying busy busy busy for
> hours. I usually shut off VO and use my windows pc and let itunes
> churn over night
> books to itunes is to launch itunes, hit command+o and point the file
> browser at my library. Itunes then goes into saying busy busy busy for
> hours. I usually shut off VO and use my windows pc and let itunes
> churn over night. My question came about because i heard the new 2016
&g
Kilburn
Sent: Wednesday, 18 January 2017 4:27 AM
To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: question for anybody with a 2016 macbook pro
Hi,
What process are you using to import the AudioBooks? I just tested mine for
fun, by importing 18 GB of AudioBooks, about 180 titles. The copying from
2017 9:05 AM
To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: question for anybody with a 2016 macbook pro
Hi Jeff,
I stand corrected. Sorry. I should have checked more carefully before posting
that. My 2011 15" MBP only has the USB 2 ports, so I assumed the 2012 did too.
That's what
ng busy busy busy for
> hours. I usually shut off VO and use my windows pc and let itunes
> churn over night. My question came about because i heard the new 2016
> macbook pro has faster cpu and faster ram. Maybe when I get a 2016 MBP
> I'll try your automatically add to itunes opti
54 matches
Mail list logo
