Second this. OSX is pretty good about not allowing one user on one
account to mangle things for another user on another account. I suspect
you'll be much happier running native on just another account that you
use for development.
CB
On 12/20/12 1:18 PM, Cheryl Homiak wrote:
Why not just have
Why not just have a separate user account created for yourself instead of a vm?
I suppose it could even be an account without administrative permissions though
that might create some problems. It seems to me that if you want to get an
experience using Mac OS and you have a Mac to use, you are ju
No question here, fusion is the way to go. Parallels is completely
inaccessible. People have been asking them to fix that for years, and
they have no interest in doing so. Go with fusion.
Original message:
My Girlfriend has a macbook pro that she is willing to let me use as a
secondary machine
My understanding is that Parallels is not accessible with VoiceOver. YOur best
and perhaps only option is Fusion if you wish to virtualize OSX.
Les
On Dec 20, 2012, at 8:19 AM, Jared wrote:
> My Girlfriend has a macbook pro that she is willing to let me use as a
> secondary machine to learn m
My Girlfriend has a macbook pro that she is willing to let me use as a
secondary machine to learn more about OSX and iphone programming. I'd like
to do this in a virtual machine running OSX to insure complete isolation
just in case I were to fat finger a terminal command or do something else
st
