t; On Feb 23, 2013, at 9:09 AM, Mike Arrigo wrote:
>>>
>>>> I doubt this even gets off the ground, but it goes to show how ridiculous
>>>> this patent thing has gotten. The entire patent system needs to be redone.
>>>> On Feb 22, 2013, at 6:12 PM, Mac
o be redone.
>>> On Feb 22, 2013, at 6:12 PM, Maccessibility
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Maccessibility has posted a new item, 'Samsung struggles to block iPhone
>>>> function for the blind'
>>>>
>>>> Samsung has suffer
thing has gotten. The entire patent system needs to be redone.
>> On Feb 22, 2013, at 6:12 PM, Maccessibility
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Maccessibility has posted a new item, 'Samsung struggles to block iPhone
>>> function for the blind'
>>>
>
http://appleinsider.com/articles/13/02/22/german-court-stays-samsung-v-apple-voiceover-suit-could-result-in-patent-invalidity
Here is the article I found on this from one of the iGeeky feeds. Just
laughable Samsung tried to go after these patents.
Maybe this will turn the tide in the internationa
t an injunction in a German court arguing
>> Apple’s VoiceOver screen-access facility infringed one of its patents.
>>
>> This article is definitely worth [...]
>>
>>
>>
>> You may view the latest post at
>> http://maccessibility.net/2013/02/22/sa
ility infringed one of its patents.
>
> This article is definitely worth [...]
>
>
>
> You may view the latest post at
> http://maccessibility.net/2013/02/22/samsung-struggles-to-block-iphone-function-for-the-blind/
>
> --
> You received this message because y
Maccessibility has posted a new item, 'Samsung struggles to block iPhone function for the blind'
Samsung has suffered a setback in its effort to win an iPhone ban based on a function making its software accessible to blind people.
The South Korean firm had sought an injunction i
