Developer rootfs for v3.1?

2007-07-07 Thread D. Scott Brown
I checked http://tablets-dev.nokia.com/d1.php, but it doesn't look like a link to the 3.1 rootfs is up yet. Anyone know when / if this is coming? Many thanks, Scott ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/m

Re: Firmware 4.2007.26-8 has inferior SDHC performance than 3.2007.10-7 - why?

2007-07-07 Thread Neil MacLeod
Daniel Stone wrote: > > The kernel has also had other changes, which IIRC include blacklisting > some cards, so if you could list exactly which card you're using in the > bug report, that would help. (Some cards were believed to run okay at > higher speeds, but would show up data corruption et al

Re: Firmware 4.2007.26-8 has inferior SDHC performance than 3.2007.10-7 - why?

2007-07-07 Thread Daniel Stone
On Sun, Jul 08, 2007 at 01:25:01AM +0100, ext Neil MacLeod wrote: > Daniel Stone wrote: > > Depends which sort of card you're using. IIRC, some cards had problems > > running at a higher frequency, so they have to fall back to lower > > speeds. > > Hi Daniel - same card before and after. The only

Re: Firmware 4.2007.26-8 has inferior SDHC performance than 3.2007.10-7 - why?

2007-07-07 Thread Neil MacLeod
Daniel Stone wrote: > > Hi, > Depends which sort of card you're using. IIRC, some cards had problems > running at a higher frequency, so they have to fall back to lower > speeds. > > Cheers, > Daniel > Hi Daniel - same card before and after. The only thing that has changed is the SDHC support

Re: Firmware 4.2007.26-8 has inferior SDHC performance than 3.2007.10-7 - why?

2007-07-07 Thread Daniel Stone
On Sun, Jul 08, 2007 at 12:58:43AM +0100, ext Neil MacLeod wrote: > Can anyone from explain why the performance of SDHC cards is reduced when > compared with the performance of the patches made available for the > 3.2007.10-7 firmware? The new firmware achieves only 50% of the read > performance

Firmware 4.2007.26-8 has inferior SDHC performance than 3.2007.10-7 - why?

2007-07-07 Thread Neil MacLeod
Can anyone from explain why the performance of SDHC cards is reduced when compared with the performance of the patches made available for the 3.2007.10-7 firmware? The new firmware achieves only 50% of the read performance possible with the old patched kernel (5.6MB/s when 11.99Mb/s is possible)

Re: maemo wiki survey

2007-07-07 Thread Greg Morgan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Quim Gil wrote: > Dear maemo contributors, can you please answer these questions? > > - What do you think about the current wiki tool at > http://maemo.org/community/wiki (leaving content aside) ? It feels like the new wiki/cms engine is missing some

Re: 3.2007.10-7 - Detailed change log?

2007-07-07 Thread Neil MacLeod
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Did you (or anyone else) manage to make any progress on a >> changelog for 3.2007.10-7? > > I have started the internal discussion with the aim of having a > changelog linking to maemo's bugzilla being published together with the > next IT OS release notes. And improve

Re: New developer tools and an Introduction

2007-07-07 Thread Kalle Vahlman
2007/7/7, Marius Gedminas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Sat, Jul 07, 2007 at 12:59:03PM +0200, Murray Cumming wrote: > > > This package requires the developers level and installs the ssh server > > > please read about changing your password and gaining root if you care > > > about your device or happen

Re: New developer tools and an Introduction

2007-07-07 Thread Marius Gedminas
On Sat, Jul 07, 2007 at 12:59:03PM +0200, Murray Cumming wrote: > > This package requires the developers level and installs the ssh server > > please read about changing your password and gaining root if you care > > about your device or happen to have personal data on your device > > > > please r

Re: New developer tools and an Introduction

2007-07-07 Thread Murray Cumming
On Fri, 2007-07-06 at 20:40 +0200, Kees Jongenburger wrote: > On 7/6/07, Murray Cumming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, 2007-07-06 at 12:29 +0300, Juha Kallioinen wrote: > > > Maybe I'm being a bit too 'Big Brotherly' with this approach, what do > > > you think? :-) > > > > It sounds perfect