Re: extras: autobuilders

2007-11-11 Thread Ville Reijonen
>> - It feels reasonable to say that a project must have a garage page, >> in order to use the auto-builder. > > What about the myriad libraries that will be added to build all the > random apps we want? Would each of these need a Garage page or could > they all be grouped under the same page? I

Do we like the same books?

2007-11-11 Thread pradeep MN
I just joined Shelfari to connect with other book lovers. Come see the books I love and see if we have any in common. Then pick my next book so I can keep on reading. Click below to join my group of friends on Shelfari! http://www.shelfari.com/Register.aspx?ActivityId=43817755&InvitationCode=a6

Re: Repositories mess: conclusions and actions

2007-11-11 Thread Nick Phillips
On 12/11/2007, at 1:03 PM, Graham Cobb wrote: > If a user does a dist-upgrade they will get both new libraries, so > no problem. > However, if the user installs an application which is built against > the new > libhildon1 (but which doesn't use libhildonfm2) then the AppMgr > will kindly > i

Re: Repositories mess: conclusions and actions

2007-11-11 Thread Graham Cobb
On Sunday 11 November 2007 22:32:53 Nick Phillips wrote: > On 12/11/2007, at 11:21 AM, Graham Cobb wrote: > > I don't think I agree. I am concerned about what will happen when > > V4.1 is > > issued. For Bora I currently build my packages against 3.0 so that > > all > > releases of Bora can be su

Re: Repositories mess: conclusions and actions

2007-11-11 Thread Nick Phillips
On 12/11/2007, at 11:21 AM, Graham Cobb wrote: > I don't think I agree. I am concerned about what will happen when > V4.1 is > issued. For Bora I currently build my packages against 3.0 so that > all > releases of Bora can be supported. I would expect that the same > thing would > happen

Re: Repositories mess: conclusions and actions

2007-11-11 Thread Graham Cobb
On Sunday 11 November 2007 15:11:51 Ed Bartosh wrote: > I'd like to discuss possible usage rules of extras-devel. > Here is my initial thoughts: > - For packages taken from Debian/Ubuntu/whatever package maintainer in > debian/control should be changed to uploader's name/e-mail I agree > - Packag

Re: problem with registration on maemo.org

2007-11-11 Thread Antoine Tremblay
I have the same problem with maemo.org :( I can login to garage but not to maemo... On Nov 11, 2007 10:17 AM, Radovan Obradovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, folks > > I am Radovan and I have a problem that maemo.org site does not let > me log in, but I am successfully registred on garage

Re: Differenced from fakeroot apt-get install and normal apt-get install?

2007-11-11 Thread Ryan Pavlik
Andrea Grandi wrote: > Hello, > > using Scratchbox, with Maemo SDK, somewhere I read this, for example: > > fakeroot apt-get install maemo-explicit > This is correct for in Scratchbox (SDK) > to install the package "maemo-explicit", while, for example, in > another site I read this: > > apt-get

Differenced from fakeroot apt-get install and normal apt-get install?

2007-11-11 Thread Andrea Grandi
Hello, using Scratchbox, with Maemo SDK, somewhere I read this, for example: fakeroot apt-get install maemo-explicit to install the package "maemo-explicit", while, for example, in another site I read this: apt-get install python2.5-runtime to install the Python environment. What are the diffe

Re: Function to check presents of WiFi connection

2007-11-11 Thread Jussi Kukkonen
Michael Stepanov wrote: > Maybe you have some example of that functionality? Not of your exact case, no. The geoclue web service object does show you how to create the object and setup the signal callback (and there must be dozens of Garage projects with this functionality): http://gitweb.freedes

problem with registration on maemo.org

2007-11-11 Thread Radovan Obradovic
Hi, folks I am Radovan and I have a problem that maemo.org site does not let me log in, but I am successfully registred on garage.maemo.org. maemo.org site do warn you that you should wait few minutes after registration on garage.maemo.org, but in my case, more than 2 days is not enough :) I am

Re: Repositories mess: conclusions and actions

2007-11-11 Thread Ed Bartosh
On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 05:04, ext Ferenc Szekely wrote: > On Nov 8, 2007 8:04 PM, Simon Pickering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Yes, so this means we definitely need extras-devel as a first step then. > > > The extras-devel repo is created with 3 different incoming queues > (gregale, bora, chin

Re: Function to check presents of WiFi connection

2007-11-11 Thread Michael Stepanov
Maybe you have some example of that functionality? On 11/7/07, Jussi Kukkonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Michael Stepanov wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm not Maemo guru. So, that's why my question may sound stupid a bit. I > > need to check WiFi connection before run my application. Is there some >

Re: extras: tracking bugs

2007-11-11 Thread Graham Cobb
On Saturday 10 November 2007 19:19:05 Mike Lococo wrote: > IMO, what is needed is a single garage project and bug-tracker for the > extras repo, rather than a separate project for every app in the repo. I agree with Mike, for the reasons he gave, although I am not certain the single extras bug tr

Re: Uninstalling SDK 3.2 Maemo

2007-11-11 Thread Tuomas Kulve
Denis DeLaRoca wrote: > In preparation for installing teh newly released SDK 4.0 Maemo, how does > one uninstall SDK 3.2 -- is it sufficient to do "rm -fr /Scratchbox"? Just make sure that you've stopped it first. Otherwise it has bind mounted e.g. your real /dev under it and rm -rf can do nasty

Uninstalling SDK 3.2 Maemo

2007-11-11 Thread Denis DeLaRoca
In preparation for installing teh newly released SDK 4.0 Maemo, how does one uninstall SDK 3.2 -- is it sufficient to do "rm -fr /Scratchbox"? -- Denis ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinf