Re: Does Debian OpenSSL problem affect Maemo ?

2008-05-16 Thread Anderson Lizardo
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 1:47 PM, MoRpHeUz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 2:17 PM, Andrew Daviel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I wondered if Maemo had inherited this problem. > > The advisories says that the versions of openssl affected are > 0.9.8c-1 up to 0.9.8g-9. O

Re: Next chat (was Re: Let's do something together in LinuxTag)

2008-05-16 Thread Ryan Abel
Quim Gil wrote: ext Dave Neary wrote: Hi, Jose Manrique Lopez de la Fuente wrote: I think we should have some kind of agenda, previously published, with few points (to make it practical). Pending topics should go to wiki or similar, to be discussed in next meetings, i.e. And a second cha

OpenSSH vulnerability and maemo extras upload accounts.

2008-05-16 Thread Niels Breet
Hi, Recently a security issue has been found in Debian\'s implementation of OpenSSH as per CVE-2008-0166. That directly affects openssh, and any key generated on Debian or Debian-derived systems from then until the recent security updates (on Debian, versions 0.9.8c-4etch3 or 0.9.8g-9) is deemed

Re: Does Debian OpenSSL problem affect Maemo ?

2008-05-16 Thread Eduardo Lima (Etrunko)
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 3:48 PM, Eduardo Lima (Etrunko) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My key seems to be on the blacklist. I've uploaded some packages > earlier today, but at this very moment I can't do it anymore. > Considering that I must regenerate my key, how should I proceed to get > it working

Re: Does Debian OpenSSL problem affect Maemo ?

2008-05-16 Thread Eduardo Lima (Etrunko)
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 3:39 PM, Dave Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > For the tablets, I'll take MoRpHeUz'S wOrD. > > For maemo.org's infrastructure, garage was taken offline earlier today > and "cleaned" - server keys were regenerated, etc. I don't know if any > of the user keys are vulnerabl

Re: Does Debian OpenSSL problem affect Maemo ?

2008-05-16 Thread Dave Neary
Hi, Andrew Daviel wrote: > Who says reading the comics is a waste of time ? > > http://xkcd.com/424/ -> google "debian openssl security" -> > > http://metasploit.com/users/hdm/tools/debian-openssl/ > > etc. > > suggesting that any certificates or SSH keys generated on a Debian system in > t

Re: Does Debian OpenSSL problem affect Maemo ?

2008-05-16 Thread MoRpHeUz
Hi, On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 2:17 PM, Andrew Daviel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I wondered if Maemo had inherited this problem. The advisories says that the versions of openssl affected are 0.9.8c-1 up to 0.9.8g-9. On my tablets, the version installed is 0.9.7 BR, --

Does Debian OpenSSL problem affect Maemo ?

2008-05-16 Thread Andrew Daviel
Who says reading the comics is a waste of time ? http://xkcd.com/424/ -> google "debian openssl security" -> http://metasploit.com/users/hdm/tools/debian-openssl/ etc. suggesting that any certificates or SSH keys generated on a Debian system in the last 2 years should be regenerated. I wo

RE: auto-start application

2008-05-16 Thread Michael D. Boulanger
I went ahead and installed 'gainroot' on the Nokia, and used vi to edit the following startup file: /etc/osso-af-init/real-af-base-apps At the end of the file, I added a line to run the application: /usr/bin/application-name This seems to work great in general, but I'm observing an odd behavior

Re: ke-recv and ke-recv-extra are now open source

2008-05-16 Thread nick loeve
Hi On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 3:45 PM, Kimmo Hämäläinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all! > > After only a year passed, I got the permission to open-source ke-recv > and ke-recv-extra :) Thats awesome! Thanks very much! > The code is available here: > > https://stage.maemo.org/svn/maemo/projects

ke-recv and ke-recv-extra are now open source

2008-05-16 Thread Kimmo Hämäläinen
Hi all! After only a year passed, I got the permission to open-source ke-recv and ke-recv-extra :) The code is available here: https://stage.maemo.org/svn/maemo/projects/haf/trunk/ke-recv/ https://stage.maemo.org/svn/maemo/projects/haf/trunk/ke-recv-extra/ ke-recv handles memory card mounting, U

RE: SBC DSP task, converting from 8bit to 16bit chars, any spare eyes?

2008-05-16 Thread Simon Pickering
Thanks to those who replied. I've had a couple of mistakes/places where I've added unnecessary code/optimisations pointed out to me :) I'll fix those and see where we go from there. Cheers, Simon > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of

Re: Next chat (was Re: Let's do something together in LinuxTag)

2008-05-16 Thread Quim Gil
ext Dave Neary wrote: > Hi, > > Jose Manrique Lopez de la Fuente wrote: >> I think we should have some kind of agenda, previously published, with >> few points (to make it practical). >> >> Pending topics should go to wiki or similar, to be discussed in next >> meetings, i.e. > > And a second c

RE: Help with YV12->YUV420 converter

2008-05-16 Thread Simon Pickering
> You can find the code I wrote here: > >http://qstream.org/viewvc/trunk/qvid/src/video_out/maemo_dsp_yuv/ > > A whole bunch of DSP related documents and things I collected > are here: > > http://qstream.org/~krasic/770/dsp/ Thanks Buck I'll take a look. Cheers, Simon

Re: RSS feed

2008-05-16 Thread Quim Gil
ext Tony Maro wrote: > Hey guys n gals - this is request #2 (the first was through the RSS feed > TBH and may have been missed). I guess this time it's acknowledged, but in fact the right channel for any Planet related request is planetATmaemo , as explained at http://maemo.org/news/planet-maemo

Re: Next chat (was Re: Let's do something together in LinuxTag)

2008-05-16 Thread Dave Neary
Hi, Jose Manrique Lopez de la Fuente wrote: > I think we should have some kind of agenda, previously published, with > few points (to make it practical). > > Pending topics should go to wiki or similar, to be discussed in next > meetings, i.e. And a second channel for anyone to talk to, with the

Re: LinuxTag ticket?

2008-05-16 Thread Quim Gil
ext Simon Pickering wrote: > Hi all, > > Just a quick question. Do presenters need to buy a ticket or do they get in > free as they are presenting? I'm not bothered either way but would like to > know so I can get one in advance and get the discount. I just asked the organizers. -- Quim Gil

Re: Next chat (was Re: Let's do something together in LinuxTag)

2008-05-16 Thread Jose Manrique Lopez de la Fuente
Hello, I think we should have some kind of agenda, previously published, with few points (to make it practical). Pending topics should go to wiki or similar, to be discussed in next meetings, i.e. 2008/5/16 Quim Gil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi, the chat was fun but there were some impracticalities

Re: Next chat (was Re: Let's do something together in LinuxTag)

2008-05-16 Thread Aniello Del Sorbo
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 9:30 AM, Quim Gil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, the chat was fun but there were some impracticalities. Fine for the > first time but, as you say, better alternatives should be tried in next > occasions. > > For instance, what about choosing one topic (or two) and go throu

Re: certificate dialog in microb

2008-05-16 Thread Zhihai Wang
Hi josh, Thanks for your advice. Maybe I didn't express myself clearly. Those signals are declared but never emitted. The only one place "certificate-dialog" emited is in gmozillaweb.c (function gtk_moz_common_certificate_error_cb): *#ifdef USE_CST ... if (result != CST_STATE_VALID) #end

Next chat (was Re: Let's do something together in LinuxTag)

2008-05-16 Thread Quim Gil
Hi, the chat was fun but there were some impracticalities. Fine for the first time but, as you say, better alternatives should be tried in next occasions. For instance, what about choosing one topic (or two) and go through it? Of course having questions in advance helps but it is also obvious that

RE: certificate dialog in microb

2008-05-16 Thread josh.soref
Zhihai Wang wrote: > When accessing some websites like "https://www.gmail.com";, a > certificate dialog will show to the user. > > I guess that the one of the following signals should be emited: > G_WEB_SIGNAL_CERTIFICATE_DIALOG (defined in gweb.h) > G_WEB_SIGNAL_CERTIFICATE_PASSWORD_DIALOG (defi