Mirrors

2010-01-02 Thread Jeff Moe
As far as I can tell, there are no mirrors of the repositories. Most large (and even small!) free software projects have complete mirrors of their archives. There are a good number of reasons: * Faster access to users that are far away on the network from the main repo. * Failover, in case some

Re: Proposal: Karma-Whores protection mailing list

2010-01-02 Thread Mustali Dalal
Till, It is obvious that your angst is against my thumbs-down to your app due to my perceived understanding of optification which is at odds with yours. Nevertheless, resorting to epithets is just lame. If you have other gripes, mention specific cases where there has been gross lapse in testing t

Re: Proposal: Karma-Whores protection mailing list

2010-01-02 Thread Andrew Flegg
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 21:53, Jeff Moe wrote: > On Saturday 02 January 2010 17:54:46 Andrew Flegg wrote: >> >> At some point the default will change from 'none' to 'auto', and then >> you can opt-out by putting the single word 'none' in debian/optify. > > I hope that day comes soon with optify is

Re: Proposal: Sharing plugin to call command-line apps (e.g. photo sharing via SCP)

2010-01-02 Thread Tuomas Kulve
Thomas Perl wrote: > Is anyone interested in collaborating on such a plugin, or does such a > thing already exist? I've been planning to implement something like that for the scp use case but haven't had the energy yet. I'm happy to at least test it, if you get something done. Thanks, -- Tuoma

Re: Proposal: Karma-Whores protection mailing list

2010-01-02 Thread Jeff Moe
On Saturday 02 January 2010 17:23:24 Till Harbaum / Lists wrote: > Hi, > > Am Samstag 02 Januar 2010 schrieb Jeff Moe: > > Does this, perchance, have anything to do with what you are talking > > about? http://maemo.org/packages/package_instance/view/fremantle_extras- > > testing_free_armel/osm2go/

Re: Proposal: Karma-Whores protection mailing list

2010-01-02 Thread Jeff Moe
On Saturday 02 January 2010 17:54:46 Andrew Flegg wrote: > For the record, you don't even need to do that now. All you need to do > is opt-in to the autobuilder doing optification for you, by putting > the single word 'auto' in a new file: debian/optify. > > At some point the default will change f

Re: Proposal: Karma-Whores protection mailing list

2010-01-02 Thread Andrew Flegg
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 20:47, Micke Nordin wrote: > > Am I missing something? Doesn't optification basicaly mean that > all you have to do is install a binary in your SDK and then you > have to add a single line to the rulesfile? For the record, you don't even need to do that now. All you need to

Re: Proposal: Karma-Whores protection mailing list

2010-01-02 Thread Micke Nordin
- Ursprungsmeddelande > > iSeems if you just freaking optified your binary all these threads > > could die. > > Just to make this clear: I WILL do this particular optification. But this will > take  some time as i am also doing other changes. And any bug i fixed in that > version is now d

Re: Proposal: Karma-Whores protection mailing list

2010-01-02 Thread Till Harbaum / Lists
Hi, Am Samstag 02 Januar 2010 schrieb Jeff Moe: > Does this, perchance, have anything to do with what you are talking about? > http://maemo.org/packages/package_instance/view/fremantle_extras- > testing_free_armel/osm2go/0.8.1-maemo1 Sure > I must say he annoyed me to at first, but make my silly

Re: Proposal: Karma-Whores protection mailing list

2010-01-02 Thread Till Harbaum / Lists
Hi, Am Samstag 02 Januar 2010 schrieb Gary Birkett: > the voice of the commons is generally to be listened to. Listening to them is fine. > we put our apps into the community, > our apps are going on their devices, > why should we have more say than them? I don't propose that we need to have mor

Re: Proposal: Karma-Whores protection mailing list

2010-01-02 Thread Jeff Moe
On Saturday 02 January 2010 16:33:56 Till Harbaum / Lists wrote: > Hi, > > it seems that some of the extras-testing testers are not really > doing a good job. Thus it seems to happen every now and then that some > app gets a thumbs down for things it shouldn't be getting a thumbs > down for or whe

Re: Proposal: Karma-Whores protection mailing list

2010-01-02 Thread Gary Birkett
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 7:33 PM, Till Harbaum / Lists wrote: > Hi, > > it seems that some of the extras-testing testers are not really > doing a good job. Thus it seems to happen every now and then that some > app gets a thumbs down for things it shouldn't be getting a thumbs > down for or where su

Re: Proposal: Karma-Whores protection mailing list

2010-01-02 Thread Jeff Moe
On Saturday 02 January 2010 16:33:56 Till Harbaum / Lists wrote: > Hi, > > it seems that some of the extras-testing testers are not really > doing a good job. Thus it seems to happen every now and then that some > app gets a thumbs down for things it shouldn't be getting a thumbs > down for or whe

Proposal: Karma-Whores protection mailing list

2010-01-02 Thread Till Harbaum / Lists
Hi, it seems that some of the extras-testing testers are not really doing a good job. Thus it seems to happen every now and then that some app gets a thumbs down for things it shouldn't be getting a thumbs down for or where such a verdict is at least questionable. My proposal is simple: Let's set

Proposal: Sharing plugin to call command-line apps (e.g. photo sharing via SCP)

2010-01-02 Thread Thomas Perl
Hello! I've been thinking of creating a "SCP" sharing plugin for uploading photos to a web server, but then thought that a "generic" command-line sharing plugin would be even more universal and useful. I'm thinking of a plugin that has a single-line configuration entry that contains the command li

sdl application hangs on exit when compiled with g++

2010-01-02 Thread W. de Hoog
Hi, While packaging an SDL application (for diablo) I noticed it could not cleanly exit. After a lot of trial and error a small test program showed me that when compiled with gcc it exits cleanly but when comiled with g++ it hangs when waiting for the audio thread to exit. Any clues on what I

Re: Where to find sources of gtk+ 2:2.14.7-1maemo15?

2010-01-02 Thread Claudio Saavedra
El sáb, 02-01-2010 a las 07:22 +0100, Marcin Juszkiewicz escribió: > Hi > > Maemo5 repository contains sources of GTK+ 2.14.17-1maemo12 but newest > hildon-desktop requires maemo15 version (crashes with maemo12 in SDK). > > Where I can find development tree with Maemo5 gtk+? > > Regards, For