Re: Let's do something together in LinuxTag

2008-05-13 Thread Sebastian Mancke
Quim Gil schrieb: > Hi, > > ext Kees Jongenburger wrote: >> On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 11:05 AM, Simon Pickering >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> > I have been thinking about what to present at linuxtag. I can not easely >>> > make a choice right now because we are lacking some form of "grand goal

Re: Qt4 hildonization.

2007-12-24 Thread Sebastian Mancke
InputMethod Framework which handles special X messages and forwards them the QT. This will be the qt equivalent to [5]. > > > > On 12/21/07, Sebastian Mancke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi Antonio, >> >> Antonio Aloisio schrieb: >>> I've fo

Re: Qt4 hildonization.

2007-12-21 Thread Sebastian Mancke
Hi Antonio, Antonio Aloisio schrieb: > I've found kkito, a kde developer that probably has got interesting > patches. But it's a old user, so it's unavailable. I'm trying to > contact him... > PS: Can i use Dbus to create Menus and to call/comunicate with > On-Screen keyboard? > (i don't know hild

Re: USB host mode on N800

2007-11-23 Thread Sebastian Mancke
# connectoin of usb client or host devices # # by Sebastian Mancke, Tarent GmbH /usr/sbin/osso-usb-mass-storage-enable.sh if /usr/sbin/chroot /mnt/initfs cal-tool --get-rd-flags | grep -q master; then echo "host" > /sys/devices/platform/musb_hdrc/mode fi Sebastian Mancke schrieb: > Hi

Re: USB host mode on N800

2007-11-23 Thread Sebastian Mancke
Hi Dave, Dave Sullivan schrieb: > On Friday 23 November 2007 4:20:00 am Sebastian Mancke wrote: >> Hi. >> >> Kees Jongenburger schrieb: >>> On Nov 22, 2007 5:58 PM, Dave Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> Hey All, >>>> >>>

Re: USB host mode on N800

2007-11-23 Thread Sebastian Mancke
Hi. Kees Jongenburger schrieb: > On Nov 22, 2007 5:58 PM, Dave Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hey All, >> >> I've got the modified kernel image for usb host mode, but before I go ahead >> and try it, what kind of cable hacking is sufficient? I'd assume I could just >> purchase a USB extens

State of Jalimo

2007-11-14 Thread Sebastian Mancke
Hi, I have just uploaded SWT 3.4 packages to the Jalimo [1] maemo3 repository, so I thought, it was time to give you a short update you about our progress. - The current stack for Os2007 is very stable. We have a well performing robust cacaojvm and and gnu classpath, which implements mostly all o

Re: Ideas for Diablo and Elephanta: OpenEmbedded

2007-09-25 Thread Sebastian Mancke
Ok, I only saw the replacement approach in mamona and didn't know the the long term goal to align with maemo, Rodrigo told. This makes sense to me. [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: > Mamona will be more useful and successful if it serves properly maemo > developers like Sebastian. I'm sure the INdT gu

Re: Ideas for Diablo and Elephanta: OpenEmbedded

2007-09-24 Thread Sebastian Mancke
Hi. [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: > Hi Sebastian, > >> It would be >> great to have a working DISTRO configuration in OE which >> enables one to produce binary compatible packages. > > Is http://dev.openbossa.org/trac/mamona going in the direction you wish? No. When I understand mamona right, it

Re: Ideas for Diablo and Elephanta: OpenEmbedded

2007-09-24 Thread Sebastian Mancke
Marius Vollmer schrieb: > "ext Sebastian Mancke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> I would love to see support for OpenEmbedded. > > What would need to be changed on the maemo side to support > OpenEmbedded? Aren't you rather asking for maemo support in

Re: Ideas for Diablo and Elephanta: OpenEmbedded

2007-09-24 Thread Sebastian Mancke
Hi Quim, I would love to see support for OpenEmbedded. It would be great to have a working DISTRO configuration in OE which enables one to produce binary compatible packages. For people like us, who are maintaining software for several target platforms, OE is the best choice to do this. Furthermor

Re: Java acceleration/Jazelle

2007-07-13 Thread Sebastian Mancke
Sebastian Mancke schrieb: > Hi Simon, > > sincerely I don't found the time to test your code yet. > >> Did you make a typo in your declaration (on p34) of int code[]? Should >> this not be unsigned char code[] as bytecodes are 1x byte not n x byte >> lon

Re: Java acceleration/Jazelle

2007-07-13 Thread Sebastian Mancke
Hi Simon, sincerely I don't found the time to test your code yet. > Did you make a typo in your declaration (on p34) of int code[]? Should > this not be unsigned char code[] as bytecodes are 1x byte not n x byte > long (I'm assuming you're running on a machine with sizeof(int)>1)? This is not a t

Re: Java acceleration/Jazelle

2007-07-11 Thread Sebastian Mancke
Hi Simon, nice research !!! This seams easier (and more os independent) than my thoughts with an interrupt in kernel mode. Although we can not say for sure, that Jazelle is implemented the way, the patent describes, this is a very good point to get a forthcome. Regards, Sebastian Simon Picker

Re: 770 Java HW Acceleration (and JVM support)

2007-06-29 Thread Sebastian Mancke
I have filled a Bug against the missing support of the Jazelle specifications for the hardware: https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1599 Sebastian Frantisek Dufka schrieb: > Sebastian Mancke wrote: > >> You can find a small example in my jalimo slides from linuxtag2007 &g

Re: 770 Java HW Acceleration (and JVM support)

2007-06-29 Thread Sebastian Mancke
Frantisek Dufka schrieb: > Jason Mills wrote: >> ...and before I forget it... these two links are very tempting: >> >> http://wiki.java.net/bin/view/Mobileandembedded/PhoneMEAdvancedPlatformsNokia >> 770 >> >> http://wiki.java.net/bin/view/Mobileandembedded/PhoneMEAdvancedPlatformsNokia >> 800 > >

Re: Sorry for bother

2007-06-05 Thread Sebastian Mancke
Hi, java applets depend on AWT, which depends on gtk2.10 for us. So it will be available with maemo4. As Antonio mentioned, we are active with JaLiMo, to bring java to maemo. And much things are already working from a developer point of view (see our updated screenshots). But it will take some mon

Linuxtag2007 - JaLiMo Slides online

2007-06-04 Thread Sebastian Mancke
Hi, I've uploaded my slides and some pictures of the JaLiMo Linuxtag talk. http://www.jalimo.org/wiki/doku.php?id=news:linuxtag2007 Regards, Sebastian -- tarent Gesellschaft für Softwareentwicklung und IT-Beratung mbH Heilsbachstr. 24, 53123 Bonn| Poststr. 4-5, 10178 Berlin fon: +49(228)

Re: JaLiMo

2007-05-16 Thread Sebastian Mancke
l for gtk_im_context_get_preedit_string() > > 5) also give a try on gtk_im_context_hide() and/or > gtk_im_context_focus_out() > > Hope this helps :) > > / Antti > > Sebastian Mancke wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Eero Tamminen schrieb: >>>> Additionally to t

Re: JaLiMo

2007-05-16 Thread Sebastian Mancke
Hi, Eero Tamminen schrieb: >> Additionally to this, we have played around with midpath, a J2ME >> implementation. Guillaume Legris from midpath wrote a gtk backend, for >> it. Currently this effort hangs, because I don't get the key events from >> the hildon/gtk libraries of the soft keyboard. >

JaLiMo

2007-05-15 Thread Sebastian Mancke
Hi, some time ago, I already announced some of our ideas about Java on maemo. Now we are on a state, where the basic things work (v0.1). So I would report it here. Everything may be obtained at: http://www.jalimo.org We have debian packages of - classpath 0.93, 0.95 - latest cacao - jamvm 1.4.5 -

Key events on GtkWindow

2007-05-10 Thread Sebastian Mancke
Hi, what do I have to do, to get all key events of an GtkWindow in maemo? With the following code I raise up a blank window and the soft-keyboard. But neither the 'key-press-event' nor the 'commit' seems to produce any events. On my host machine, the 'key-press-event' works fine. Regards, Seba

Cross compiling under debian

2007-04-18 Thread Sebastian Mancke
Hi, compiling my packages with Java-JNI-code (e.g. classpath) for maemo does not work out of the box, because scratchbox does not have all the required build tools (javac, javah, jar). My long-term goal would be to use openembedded, but this will need much work, I think. So, at the moment I cross

Re: Maemo Language bindings and priorities

2007-04-11 Thread Sebastian Mancke
Hi, my interest is also in Java language bindings. As I mentioned before, we have started JaLiMo [1] therefore and since a week, the time to work on JaLiMo grows. So maybe its time to start sharing the ideas. It seems to me, that Johannes and I have a similar understanding, of the problems with J

Re: JNI on scratchbox

2007-03-27 Thread Sebastian Mancke
Hi magda, magda chelly schrieb: > Hello everybody!! > > Have someone an idea how to do an application that use > JNI in scratchbox? JNI consists of two parts: 1. The native code (e.g. with the generated header file generated by javah): This code has no java dependencies (only the jni.h has to be

Re: [Java] Mentor wanted for Summer of Code 2007 ;)

2007-03-06 Thread Sebastian Mancke
It seems at least three possibilities are > currently considered by different people. > > 1. jamvm + classpath > 2. cacaovm + classpath + java-gnome (jalimo by Sebastian Mancke) > 3. sun's phoneME advanced well, we should try to integrate any efforts. 1. vs. 2. Between 1. an 2., IM

Re: Asking for information about programming in JAVA at Nokia device

2007-02-27 Thread Sebastian Mancke
Hello Magda, we have recently started a project with the aim to maintain a full featured free java stack for mobile linux devices, called JaLiMo. The goal is to package and tailor existing jvm-related projects, as well as develop APIs for easy integration with the target platforms. Since we have