Osvaldo Santana Neto wrote:
> +--+-+
> | | pystones/s |
> +--+-+-+-+
> | Python | 2.2 | 2.3 | 2.4 |
> +---
David Briggs wrote:
>The 6630 is based on the same TI processor (OMAP 1710 @
>220Mhz) as the 770. It also has 10MB ram of which 7MB is usable by
>applications. It would be interesting to see what (if any)difference
>there might be between Nokia's optimized implementation on the 6630 vs
>the o
Jukka Laurila wrote:
>> I just want to add a data point here: You don't mention which
>> version of Python for Series 60 was used here, but that figure
>> looks like it's from the 1.0 release. Some tweaks were made
>> after that, and the 1.1.5fast build got 685 pystones on a
>> 6630, which mat
Osvaldo Santana Neto wrote:
>> +--+-+
>> | | pystones/s |
>> +--+-+-+-+
>> | Python | 2.2 | 2.3 | 2.4 |
>> +---
On Thursday 11 August 2005 08:19 am, Ken Rimey wrote:
> On 11 Aug 2005, at 15:49, Koen Kooi wrote:
> > If pystone uses floatingpoint math the low results could be subscribed
> > by linux using hardfloat (raising an exception in the kernel every FP
> > operation) and symbian handling it more gently.
On 11 Aug 2005, at 15:49, Koen Kooi wrote:
If pystone uses floatingpoint math the low results could be subscribed
by linux using hardfloat (raising an exception in the kernel every FP
operation) and symbian handling it more gently. I'm guessing here
since
I'm no expert.
After a quick glan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Osvaldo Santana Neto wrote:
> Hi Ken,
>
> Ken Rimey wrote:
>
>>Rudá Moura wrote:
>>
>>
>>>This is what pystone shows me in my Nokia 770.
>>>
>>>su-18-21:~# python2.4 pystone.py
>>>Pystone(1.1) time for 5 passes = 184.19
>>>This machine benchmarks
Hi Ken,
Ken Rimey wrote:
> Rudá Moura wrote:
>
>> This is what pystone shows me in my Nokia 770.
>>
>> su-18-21:~# python2.4 pystone.py
>> Pystone(1.1) time for 5 passes = 184.19
>> This machine benchmarks at 271.459 pystones/second
>
>
> Strange. I get 515 pystones/second with Python for
Rudá Moura wrote:
This is what pystone shows me in my Nokia 770.
su-18-21:~# python2.4 pystone.py
Pystone(1.1) time for 5 passes = 184.19
This machine benchmarks at 271.459 pystones/second
Strange. I get 515 pystones/second with Python for Series 60
(1.1.6, "fast" version) running on a No
