Carlos Guerreiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Do you have a good solution for handling packages that cannot be
> upgraded while the HAF is running?
Yes, those packages should be fixed! :-)
> I had a chat with Guillem some time ago. I got the picture that
> making maemo-launcher upgradeable with
> "ext Marius Vollmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I'd say now is a good time to start experimenting. I would be happy
> > to add some hacks to the osso-application-installer in sardine...
>
> Ok, I am going to do the following (in the next days or so): the
> "Check for updates" view will
"ext Marius Vollmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'd say now is a good time to start experimenting. I would be happy
> to add some hacks to the osso-application-installer in sardine...
Ok, I am going to do the following (in the next days or so): the
"Check for updates" view will include a fake
"ext Neal H. Walfield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What florian wants is `apt-get upgrade' functionality, i.e. install
> updates for any installed package.
Yep, and the Application installer does not give you that at the
moment, unfortunately.
We were dodging all the system upgrade issues when
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Adrian Neumaier schreef:
> What was the section before? just lib? Afaik a section user/lib isn't
> available in debian :)
Neither are packages for armel ;)
regards,
Koen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFEwOzXMkyG
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Koen Kooi schrieb:
> Cute, but the real problem is something different:
>
> Day 1:
> Florian uploads gpe-calendar 0.99-12 + libeventdb1 0.36-17
>
> Day 2:
> Neal fixes bug in gpe-calendar, florian upload 0.99-13
> Koen uses the AI, gets the updated
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Adrian Neumaier schreef:
> I suppose you read this: http://www.debian.org/doc/maint-guide/ on how to
> build proper debian archives.
>
> But for that lib problem:
> it can't be too hard to write a control file like this:
>
>
> Build-Depends: libfoo
I suppose you read this: http://www.debian.org/doc/maint-guide/ on how to
build proper debian archives.
But for that lib problem:
it can't be too hard to write a control file like this:
Build-Depends: libfoo-dev ( >= 1.0.0-1), bar (>= 1.0.0)
This will pull libfoo in a package version >= 1.0.0
> If the application needs a particular version of the library, or higher
> than (for whatever reasons, not just ABI compatibility), then the package
> should declare that -- that is not a hack; if the application does not need
> a newer version than is on the device already, then this question bec
Hi,
Neal H. Walfield wrote:
> At Thu, 20 Jul 2006 18:06:31 +0100,
> Tomas Frydrych wrote:
>>> how are updates of library packages which are not visible in the
>>> application manager expected to work? We just noticed that when updating
>>> gpe-calendar the updated libeventdb does not get installed
At Thu, 20 Jul 2006 18:06:31 +0100,
Tomas Frydrych wrote:
> > how are updates of library packages which are not visible in the
> > application manager expected to work? We just noticed that when updating
> > gpe-calendar the updated libeventdb does not get installed. libeventdb
> > is visible becau
> how are updates of library packages which are not visible in the
> application manager expected to work? We just noticed that when updating
> gpe-calendar the updated libeventdb does not get installed. libeventdb
> is visible because its section currently is "user/libs", so in this case
> i can
Hello,
how are updates of library packages which are not visible in the application
manager expected to work? We just noticed that when updating gpe-calendar the
updated libeventdb does not get installed. libeventdb is visible because its
section currently is "user/libs", so in this case i can
13 matches
Mail list logo
