Re: Maemo-Optify & Builder Bots = Broken?

2009-10-26 Thread Marius Vollmer
ext Ed Bartosh writes: > Why they put this symlink in there if it's not needed and even > prevents installation of optified packages? The symlink is in the base-files package, and we included it in the package (instead of creating it from postinst) because otherwise dpkg might remove it when /op

Re: Maemo-Optify & Builder Bots = Broken?

2009-10-24 Thread Ed Bartosh
2009/10/24 Graham Cobb : > On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 11:03:18AM +0300, Ed Bartosh wrote: >> 2009/10/24 Graham Cobb : >> > I think sbdmock needs to do the same thing after installing the rootstrap. >> > >> I don't think so. It looks like a hack to remove something provided by >> official SDK image. >>

Re: Maemo-Optify & Builder Bots = Broken?

2009-10-24 Thread Graham Cobb
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 11:03:18AM +0300, Ed Bartosh wrote: > 2009/10/24 Graham Cobb : > > I think sbdmock needs to do the same thing after installing the rootstrap. > > > I don't think so. It looks like a hack to remove something provided by > official SDK image. > Why they put this symlink in the

Re: Maemo-Optify & Builder Bots = Broken?

2009-10-24 Thread Ed Bartosh
2009/10/24 Graham Cobb : > > I don't think you will get anywhere. Isn't this a known issue? The manual > installation instructions for the SDK > (http://wiki.maemo.org/Documentation/Maemo5_Final_Installation#Manual_Installation) > include: > > In order to facilitate installing applications under

Re: Maemo-Optify & Builder Bots = Broken?

2009-10-23 Thread Graham Cobb
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 09:37:11AM +0300, Ed Bartosh wrote: > 2009/10/22 Kamen Bundev : > > Hmm, yes, that seems to be the problem. In the final SDK /opt is a symlink > > but in the latest beta SDK it is not. I didn't upgrade my development > > machine, but I have the final on another so I can comp

Re: Maemo-Optify & Builder Bots = Broken?

2009-10-22 Thread Ed Bartosh
2009/10/22 Julius Luukko : > > But did you forgot to do it for x86 target? armel builds now fine, but i386 > does not [1]: > Oops, sorry. My bad. Done. Should work now. Just in case someone wants to do the same for their rootstraps. This is what I did: gunzip /scratchbox/packages/maemo-sdk-roots

Re: Maemo-Optify & Builder Bots = Broken?

2009-10-22 Thread Julius Luukko
Ed Bartosh wrote: > 2009/10/22 Kamen Bundev : >> Hmm, yes, that seems to be the problem. In the final SDK /opt is a symlink >> but in the latest beta SDK it is not. I didn't upgrade my development >> machine, but I have the final on another so I can compare. I'll report back >> if successful. >> >

RE: Maemo-Optify & Builder Bots = Broken?

2009-10-22 Thread Nathan Anderson
t;>> >>>So, I don't think it has anything to do with the scratchbox. I >>> suspect it as Ed found something to do with the symlink -> directory >>> or something in their on the auto-builder. >>> >>> Nathan. >>>

Re: Maemo-Optify & Builder Bots = Broken?

2009-10-22 Thread Marius Vollmer
ext Ed Bartosh writes: > 2009/10/22 Kamen Bundev : >> Hmm, yes, that seems to be the problem. In the final SDK /opt is a symlink >> but in the latest beta SDK it is not. I didn't upgrade my development >> machine, but I have the final on another so I can compare. I'll report back >> if successful

Re: Maemo-Optify & Builder Bots = Broken?

2009-10-22 Thread Kamen Bundev
x27;t "left" > over > >>> stuff causing a success. ;-) > >>> > >>> So, I don't think it has anything to do with the scratchbox. I > suspect > >>> it as Ed found something to do with the symlink -> directory or > somethi

Re: Maemo-Optify & Builder Bots = Broken?

2009-10-22 Thread Ed Bartosh
to do with the scratchbox. I suspect >>> it as Ed found something to do with the symlink -> directory or something in >>> their on the auto-builder. >>> >>> Nathan. >>> >>> From: Kamen Bundev [mailto:bun...@

Re: Maemo-Optify & Builder Bots = Broken?

2009-10-21 Thread Kamen Bundev
e scratchbox. I > suspect > >> it as Ed found something to do with the symlink -> directory or > something in > >> their on the auto-builder. > >> > >> Nathan. > >> > >> From: Kamen Bundev [mailto:bun...

Re: Maemo-Optify & Builder Bots = Broken?

2009-10-21 Thread Ed Bartosh
th the symlink -> directory or something in >> their on the auto-builder. >> >> Nathan. >> ________________ >> From: Kamen Bundev [mailto:bun...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 6:14 PM >> To: Nathan Anderson >> Cc: mae

Re: Maemo-Optify & Builder Bots = Broken?

2009-10-21 Thread Ed Bartosh
2009/10/22 Kamen Bundev : > Hmm, yes, that seems to be the problem. In the final SDK /opt is a symlink > but in the latest beta SDK it is not. I didn't upgrade my development > machine, but I have the final on another so I can compare. I'll report back > if successful. > You're right. Autobuilder u

Re: Maemo-Optify & Builder Bots = Broken?

2009-10-21 Thread Kamen Bundev
omething to do with the symlink -> directory or something in > their on the auto-builder. > > Nathan. > > -- > *From:* Kamen Bundev [mailto:bun...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Wednesday, October 21, 2009 6:14 PM > > *To:* Nathan Anderson > *Cc:*

RE: Maemo-Optify & Builder Bots = Broken?

2009-10-21 Thread Nathan Anderson
eir on the auto-builder. Nathan. _ From: Kamen Bundev [mailto:bun...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 6:14 PM To: Nathan Anderson Cc: maemo-developers@maemo.org Subject: Re: Maemo-Optify & Builder Bots = Broken? Nah, that's not enough. Still fails. Another di

Re: Maemo-Optify & Builder Bots = Broken?

2009-10-21 Thread Kamen Bundev
I believe this is what you are asking: >>> FREMANTLE_ARMEL cs2007q3-glibc2.5-arm7 >>> FREMANTLE_X86cs2007q3-glibc2.5-i486 >>> >>> >>> Nathan >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Ed Bartosh [mailto:bart...@gmail.com] &

Re: Maemo-Optify & Builder Bots = Broken?

2009-10-21 Thread Kamen Bundev
derson > Cc: maemo-developers@maemo.org > Subject: Re: Maemo-Optify & Builder Bots = Broken? > > 2009/10/21 Nathan Anderson : > > Ed, > > > >Sure can (and following the chain). > > > > ls -l / | grep opt > >lrwxrwxrwx1 root r

RE: Maemo-Optify & Builder Bots = Broken?

2009-10-21 Thread Nathan Anderson
-developers@maemo.org Subject: Re: Maemo-Optify & Builder Bots = Broken? 2009/10/21 Nathan Anderson : > Ed, > >Sure can (and following the chain). > > ls -l / | grep opt >lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 18 Oct 6 22:36 opt -> > /targets/links/opt > >

Re: Maemo-Optify & Builder Bots = Broken?

2009-10-21 Thread Kamen Bundev
Hmm, yes, that seems to be the problem. In the final SDK /opt is a symlink but in the latest beta SDK it is not. I didn't upgrade my development machine, but I have the final on another so I can compare. I'll report back if successful. Regards: Bundyo On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 12:03 AM, Ed Bartosh

Re: Maemo-Optify & Builder Bots = Broken?

2009-10-21 Thread Ed Bartosh
2009/10/21 Nathan Anderson : > Ed, > >Sure can (and following the chain). > > ls -l / | grep opt >lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 18 Oct 6 22:36 opt -> > /targets/links/opt > > ls -l /targets/links/ | grep opt >lrwxrwxrwx 1 maemo 1000 26 Oct 19 16:55 opt -> > /targets/FREM

Re: Maemo-Optify & Builder Bots = Broken?

2009-10-21 Thread Kamen Bundev
Mine is installing normally in the armel target and on the device. Here is the output from apt-get on the device /don't mind the broken xournal/: Nokia-N900-41-10:~# apt-get install libwebkit-1.0-1 Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The followi

RE: Maemo-Optify & Builder Bots = Broken?

2009-10-21 Thread Nathan Anderson
ttp://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?p=354509 Nathan. -Original Message- From: Ed Bartosh [mailto:bart...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 3:00 PM To: Nathan Anderson Cc: maemo-developers@maemo.org Subject: Re: Maemo-Optify & Builder Bots = Broken? 2009/10/21 Nathan Anderson

RE: Maemo-Optify & Builder Bots = Broken?

2009-10-21 Thread Nathan Anderson
Ed, Here is my output. Looking through the list I do not appear to he -cputransp and -maemo3 ii scratchbox-core 1.0.16 Scratchbox base system ii scratchbox-devkit-apt-https 1.0.10 APT HTTPS devkit for Scratchbox ii scratchbox-devkit-debia

Re: Maemo-Optify & Builder Bots = Broken?

2009-10-21 Thread Ed Bartosh
2009/10/21 Nathan Anderson : > Ed, > >Sure can (and following the chain). > > ls -l / | grep opt >lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 18 Oct 6 22:36 opt -> > /targets/links/opt > > ls -l /targets/links/ | grep opt >lrwxrwxrwx 1 maemo 1000 26 Oct 19 16:55 opt -> > /targets/FREM

Re: Maemo-Optify & Builder Bots = Broken?

2009-10-21 Thread Ed Bartosh
2009/10/21 Nathan Anderson : > Ed, > >Sure can (and following the chain). > > ls -l / | grep opt >lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 18 Oct 6 22:36 opt -> > /targets/links/opt > > ls -l /targets/links/ | grep opt >lrwxrwxrwx 1 maemo 1000 26 Oct 19 16:55 opt -> > /targets/FREM

RE: Maemo-Optify & Builder Bots = Broken?

2009-10-21 Thread Nathan Anderson
a bug report in earlier today at https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5674 if you are handling it. ;-) -Original Message- From: Ed Bartosh [mailto:bart...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 2:23 PM To: Nathan Anderson Cc: maemo-developers@maemo.org Subject: Re: Maemo-Optify &am

Re: Maemo-Optify & Builder Bots = Broken?

2009-10-21 Thread Ed Bartosh
2009/10/21 Nathan Anderson : > Ed, > >I have actually installed all the packages I have built and > submitted to extras _inside_ my scratchbox from extras(-devel/testing) Good. In this case we just need to understand what's the difference between your environment and autobuilder one. Can y

RE: Maemo-Optify & Builder Bots = Broken?

2009-10-21 Thread Nathan Anderson
kages is adding the "maemo-optify" before the md5 generation step. Nathan. -Original Message- From: Ed Bartosh [mailto:bart...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 1:26 PM To: Nathan Anderson Cc: maemo-developers@maemo.org Subject: Re: Maemo-Optify & Builder Bots = Broken?

Re: Maemo-Optify & Builder Bots = Broken?

2009-10-21 Thread Ed Bartosh
2009/10/21 Nathan Anderson : ... > Selecting previously deselected package clucene-core. > Unpacking clucene-core (from .../clucene-core_0.9.21b-0maemo1_armel.deb) ... > dpkg: error processing > /var/cache/apt/archives/clucene-core_0.9.21b-0maemo1_armel.deb (--unpack): > trying to overwrite `/opt'

RE: Maemo-Optify & Builder Bots = Broken?

2009-10-21 Thread Nathan Anderson
g. I've added it as a bug to the bugtracker: https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5674 Nathan -Original Message- From: Julius Luukko [mailto:julle.luu...@quicknet.inet.fi] Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 11:45 AM To: Nathan Anderson Cc: maemo-developers@maemo.org Subje

Re: Maemo-Optify & Builder Bots = Broken?

2009-10-21 Thread Julius Luukko
Nathan Anderson wrote: > Try to install static depends: libcurl3 libcurl3-dev libicu42 libicu42-dev > clucene-core clucene-core-dev zlib1g-dev python2.5 python2.5-dev > [2009-10-21 12:30:46] fakeroot apt-get -y -q -o > APT::Get::AllowUnauthenticated=1 install --no-remove libcurl3 libcurl3-dev > lib

Re: Maemo-Optify & Builder Bots = Broken?

2009-10-21 Thread Kamen Bundev
Welcome to the club :) I have the same problem. Regards: Bundyo On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Nathan Anderson wrote: > Devs, > >Ok, I have been trying to be a good boy and optify all the items I > have been putting into the fremantle extras. Up to now they have been > standalone libr

Maemo-Optify & Builder Bots = Broken?

2009-10-21 Thread Nathan Anderson
Devs, Ok, I have been trying to be a good boy and optify all the items I have been putting into the fremantle extras. Up to now they have been standalone libraries and the build bots have done their job and optified the package (and then I've been able to install them in my sdk properly).