Re: Maemo -> MeeGo migration (was Re: maemo.org team meeting Tuesday the 14th?)

2010-09-08 Thread Quim Gil
On 09/07/2010 11:56 PM, ext Andrew Flegg wrote: > [Follow-ups to maemo-developers, please] > > On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 19:22, Quim Gil wrote: >> >> On 09/07/2010 10:10 AM, ext Andrea Grandi wrote: >>> let me understand better then. If neither a migration is planned, how >>> the Maemo Community w

Re: Maemo -> MeeGo migration (was Re: maemo.org team meeting Tuesday the 14th?)

2010-09-08 Thread Michael Cronenworth
Andrew Flegg wrote: http://lists.meego.com/pipermail/meego-dev/2010-September/005525.html This is very sad. I see nothing has changed since I left the MeeGo lists. Having static packages is so 2000! A MeeGo foundation should be to have all packages in upstream MeeGo repositories instead of

Maemo -> MeeGo migration (was Re: maemo.org team meeting Tuesday the 14th?)

2010-09-07 Thread Andrew Flegg
[Follow-ups to maemo-developers, please] On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 19:22, Quim Gil wrote: > > On 09/07/2010 10:10 AM, ext Andrea Grandi wrote: >> let me understand better then. If neither a migration is planned, how >> the Maemo Community will be related to the MeeGo one? > > The question is: what w