Hi,
Personnaly i didn't care anymore about extras.
If people need to use my apps i just ask them to use my repository. No
QA Hassle ... :)
And if someone want to package it to maemo extras repo he can ... but
in three month this didn't happen.
Best regards,
2010/7/21 Roman Morawek :
> Hello,
>
> I assume there is a big "part" of the solution that depends on the "data
> feeds" being available on the server.
We have an OCS api for packages. In this api you can list from any
repository in the packages interface. Appdownloader can easily be adapted
to use different urls when in testing mod
on probably won't require many changes. If no, we need someone with
access to the "server" to evaluate... anybody?
Felipe
-Original Message-
From: Attila Csipa [mailto:ma...@csipa.in.rs]
Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 7:41 AM
To: Felipe Crochik
Cc: maemo-developers@maemo.org
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 2:02 PM, Thomas Perl wrote:
> Wouldn't this slow down the whole process even more? Instead of
> getting one vote right away, you have to wait for the "return vote" to
> be completed, and only then the vote gets counted. A "download
People could still give unconditinal vot
On Thursday 22 July 2010 00:19:20 Felipe Crochik wrote:
> I added a message to the "download assistant" thread but never received a
> reply. http://talk.maemo.org/showpost.php?p=717824&postcount=17
>
> Maybe someone knows the maintainer or what is behind the scenes and can
> find out if it is a via
Hi all,
do you think that the possibility to vote (UP/DOWN) applications and
send feedback directly from N900 could help the process? It's just an
idea eh...
Another feature I'd like to see on Application Manager is the
possibility to know if an application I see comes from maemo-extras,
extras-t
2010/7/22 Ville M. Vainio :
> How about a system where developers could convince other developers to
> test drive their application by voting on theirs? I.e. being able to
> give a conditional vote that is "realized" only after the receiver
> votes up/down on your application?
Wouldn't this slow d
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Thomas Perl wrote:
> If there are enough users / testers, releasing every month is no
> problem. I have the same situation with my app (a new release nearly
> every month), and with enough testers, I usually get enough votes in
Well, using, say, gPodder (a "bests
Servus!
2010/7/21 Roman Morawek :
> [...] Actually, I think in the early lifetime of a SW project there
> will probably be a release every few months, which could permanently
> block the tool's promotion to extras.
If there are enough users / testers, releasing every month is no
problem. I have t
On Thursday 22 July 2010 02:35:47 Ian Stirling wrote:
> > Note that since not long ago we also have super-testers, people with
> > proven track records, it's enough to get three of their votes if your
> > package is stuck and you're good to go.
>
> Where is the super-testers list?
> I've tested a f
Attila Csipa wrote:
On Wednesday 21 July 2010 22:53:43 Roman Morawek wrote:
P.S.: You are welcome to evaluate and vote on my package:
Indeed, the best strategy for developers is to lobby a bit for their
application. Open a thread on talk.maemo.org . Blog about it. Write to the
list. I hope t
ginal Message-
From: maemo-developers-boun...@maemo.org
[mailto:maemo-developers-boun...@maemo.org] On Behalf Of Attila Csipa
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 5:56 PM
To: maemo-developers@maemo.org
Subject: Re: Maemo QA process
On Wednesday 21 July 2010 22:53:43 Roman Morawek wrote:
>P.S.: You are
hem after testing.
Felipe
-Original Message-
From: maemo-developers-boun...@maemo.org
[mailto:maemo-developers-boun...@maemo.org] On Behalf Of Attila Csipa
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 5:56 PM
To: maemo-developers@maemo.org
Subject: Re: Maemo QA process
On Wednesday 21 July 2010 22:53:
On Wednesday 21 July 2010 22:53:43 Roman Morawek wrote:
>P.S.: You are welcome to evaluate and vote on my package:
Indeed, the best strategy for developers is to lobby a bit for their
application. Open a thread on talk.maemo.org . Blog about it. Write to the
list. I hope the fellow devs won't ta
Hi,
On 21 July 2010 22:53, Roman Morawek wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I like to share my thoughts on the QA strategy of Maemo.
>
> I am the owner of an N900 program and promoted my package to
> extras-testing ca. 2 months ago. Right now there are only 2 votes on it.
> I wonder how many more months it will
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 3:53 PM, Roman Morawek wrote:
>
> I am the owner of an N900 program and promoted my package to
> extras-testing ca. 2 months ago. Right now there are only 2 votes on it.
> I wonder how many more months it will take until 10 persons vote for it
> such that I can promote it t
Hello,
I like to share my thoughts on the QA strategy of Maemo.
I am the owner of an N900 program and promoted my package to
extras-testing ca. 2 months ago. Right now there are only 2 votes on it.
I wonder how many more months it will take until 10 persons vote for it
such that I can promote it
17 matches
Mail list logo
